Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: 6*F-22 vs 6*Typhoon vs 6*Rafale in the UAE?!
giblets    11/16/2009 4:48:58 AM
According to both Flight Global, and Defence News, other than attending the Dubai airshow, the USAF, RAF, and FAF each sent 6 of their finest fighter aircraft to the desert Kingdom to take part in multinational exercises. Other than adding much fuel to the fire for forum members here! It raises many questions (such as why the USAF was unable to send 1 F-22 to Paris, and can now send 6 to the UAE, despite no drop in operational tempo). And will the F22 and Typhoon not be in the air at the same time again?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
french stratege       11/16/2009 7:50:41 PM
Nothing special for the drugs, just wine, cheese and a cigarette.French classics.
 
Quote    Reply

RedParadize       11/16/2009 8:27:59 PM
I would like to see it happen, but it will probably only be a showcase of the 3 fighters.
 
I don't think its in interest of these 3 company/country to do that kind of contest. They have more to lose than what the could gain.
 
Truly, Lockheed Martin have nothing to gain, the raptor is not for sale (yet) and is already seen as be the best, why jeopardize all that? Even if its unlikely, a single lost for the F-22 raptor would have a catastrophic effect on the current F-35 program. and a success probably wont boost the f-35 sale. An i am not talking about pressious information that could be gain from such engagement...
 
Its also a bad idea for Eurofighter and Rafale, Being compared to the F-22 is not good for the sale, unless they win some of the engagement, with is unlikely. They also don't want to be compared to each other, they are disputing the same market. Only the Rafale would have a marginal interest in this contest, cause it is rated inferior by most. But still, if the Rafale finish 3rd it will confirm this.
 
Quote    Reply

One Five Five Echo       11/16/2009 9:13:03 PM
I would like to see it happen, but it will probably only be a showcase of the 3 fighters.
 
It is an interop exercise simulating a large scale air battle, just like TLP and Red Flag.  I'm sure people are going to hot dog around in DACT, scheduled or not, but that's not the point of going there.
 
Quote    Reply

mabie       11/17/2009 1:42:17 AM
Maybe the UAE just wants to get some firsthand experience with a LO platform.. F-35 not available so F-22s are a good substitute. Maybe there are F-35s in the UAE's future?
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       11/17/2009 3:38:05 AM
FS, you're not seriously talking about shooting missiles at other aircraft during a training exercise, are you?
 
Tell you what--let me shoot you with a bullet.  Don't worry; it probably won't hit and if it does, you'll probably survive...right?
 
(You are joking, I hope.)
 
 
Quote    Reply

giblets       11/17/2009 4:55:13 AM
Against an F-22 the Typhoon and Rafale only have to do better than expected to come out smiling, previously contested rumours have claimed the Typhoon achieved this in the US, despite coming off worse (I use the word 'contested' to avoid this starting another long 'discussion'!). The F22 HAS to do as advertised, or it will be considered a bad result.
 
If either can get within and detect the F-22 within missile range (~65miles for the AMRAAM) without being blown out of the sky, then this will be seen very much as a victory for these aircraft, and, as stated by others, bring serious concerns for the F-35 and F-22.
 
As for Rafale vs Typhoon, think it does exactly what it says on the tin!
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

french stratege       11/17/2009 3:57:36 PM
If either can get within and detect the F-22 within missile range (~65miles for the AMRAAM) without being blown out of the sky, then this will be seen very much as a victory for these aircraft, and, as stated by others, bring serious concerns for the F-35 and F-22.

First advertised AMRAAM (or Mica or SAM missiles etc.) range are against an non manoeuvering target.Real shooting range against a manoeuvering fighter is more about 30 to 40 miles (see AMRAAM combat report).
But the problem is to accept a simulated combat in realistic situation.Which mean to use war mode for radar and ECM and I think it is difficult for USA and French to accept it, since both aircrafts have a very potent ESM/RWR suit and will register all spectrum caracteristics of each other (not to mention ELINT planes which could be not far away).
Normally using those modes is prohibited during DACT even with allies.
I wonder if USA don't want simulated combat between F22 and Eurofighter (not part of UAE competition) then Eurofighter and Rafale.
However I think that french should accept it to prove the Rafale mayve using some downgraded or specially adapted ECCM or ECM to preserve real war modes.
 
Sentinel 28
I'm half serious.If I where a pilot with a less than 10% possibility to be killed and earning few millions $(and a medal to add), I would take the risk and the challenge.
 
Quote    Reply

french stratege       11/17/2009 4:00:36 PM
Read
I wonder if UAE (or USA) want simulated combat between F22 and Eurofighter (not part of UAE competition) then Eurofighter and Rafale. So no direct competition between F22 and Rafale.
However I think that french should accept it to prove the Rafale maybe using some downgraded or specially adapted ECCM or ECM to preserve real war modes.
 
Quote    Reply

Lynstyne       11/17/2009 4:23:19 PM

If either can get within and detect the F-22 within missile range (~65miles for the AMRAAM) without being blown out of the sky, then this will be seen very much as a victory for these aircraft, and, as stated by others, bring serious concerns for the F-35 and F-22.



First advertised AMRAAM (or Mica or SAM missiles etc.) range are against an non manoeuvering target.Real shooting range against a manoeuvering fighter is more about 30 to 40 miles (see AMRAAM combat report).

But the problem is to accept a simulated combat in realistic situation.Which mean to use war mode for radar and ECM and I think it is difficult for USA and French to accept it, since both aircrafts have a very potent ESM/RWR suit and will register all spectrum caracteristics of each other (not to mention ELINT planes which could be not far away).

Normally using those modes is prohibited during DACT even with allies.

I wonder if USA don't want simulated combat between F22 and Eurofighter (not part of UAE competition) then Eurofighter and Rafale.

However I think that french should accept it to prove the Rafale mayve using some downgraded or specially adapted ECCM or ECM to preserve real war modes.

 

Sentinel 28

I'm half serious.If I where a pilot with a less than 10% possibility to be killed and earning few millions $(and a medal to add), I would take the risk and the challenge.


Why not ?
Lets face it theres a few posters on this forum who are shot down so often that actually being in a dog fight should hold no fear for them
 
Quote    Reply

Beazz       11/17/2009 5:05:38 PM

If either can get within and detect the F-22 within missile range (~65miles for the AMRAAM) without being blown out of the sky, then this will be seen very much as a victory for these aircraft, and, as stated by others, bring serious concerns for the F-35 and F-22.



First advertised AMRAAM (or Mica or SAM missiles etc.) range are against an non manoeuvering target.Real shooting range against a manoeuvering fighter is more about 30 to 40 miles (see AMRAAM combat report).

But the problem is to accept a simulated combat in realistic situation.Which mean to use war mode for radar and ECM and I think it is difficult for USA and French to accept it, since both aircrafts have a very potent ESM/RWR suit and will register all spectrum caracteristics of each other (not to mention ELINT planes which could be not far away).

Normally using those modes is prohibited during DACT even with allies.

I wonder if USA don't want simulated combat between F22 and Eurofighter (not part of UAE competition) then Eurofighter and Rafale.

However I think that french should accept it to prove the Rafale mayve using some downgraded or specially adapted ECCM or ECM to preserve real war modes.

 

Sentinel 28

I'm half serious.If I where a pilot with a less than 10% possibility to be killed and earning few millions $(and a medal to add), I would take the risk and the challenge.


It's not going to matter if it's 60 miles or 30 miles FS. The Rafail is not going to see the Raptor OR be able to get a lock on it if it did. Everyone is familiar with the UK pilot who said he had the F22 clearly in sight visually BUT still could NOT get a lock on it. How many *single* digit miles do you think he was away from the Raptor? Then there is this from a Red Flag back in 05 or 06.
While it wasn't part of a hard-turning furball, an F-22--with its Amraams and Sidewinders expended--slipped into visual range behind an F-16 and undetected made a simulated kill with its cannon during the stealth fighter's first large-scale exercise and deployment outside the continental U.S.
I would think if the Raptor got close enough for a gun kill without being picked up on RADAR that would certainly be WAY closer then any 30 miles? The US knows full well what they got in the F22 and all it can do. We do NOT have to prove it to France or anyone seeing how we are NOT selling it. The more people that know exactly what and therefore possibly *how* the F22 does something, the more people that could then work on more specific ways to defeat what it can do. So what on earth would be the purpose of showing what it can actually do to anyone, even our allies? Not one thing good can come from it, but quiet possibly something extremely bad could. Showing anyone what and how the F22 actually does it's killing simply for the sake of bragging rights would be silly beyond comprehension and possibly deadly to some US pilot in the future.
 
Beazz
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics