Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: ***Super Hornet Bible Prophecy: Deuteronomy 7:20***
DarthAmerica    9/13/2007 8:40:31 PM
"Moreover the LORD thy God will send the hornet among them, until they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed." --Deuteronomy 7:20 Modern Translation Here: http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/03/13/212600/ultra-hornet.html Ultra Hornet By Graham Warwick Boeing and the US Navy are poised to expand and exploit the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet's capability for precision engagement and battle management now the upgraded platform is matched to the latest avionics While debate rages over the hallmarks and advantages of fifth-generation fighters, Boeing is preparing to deliver the next generation of its long-running F/A-18. The F/A-18E/F Block II+ Super Hornet is the culmination of a fundamental upgrade of the multi-role fighter and the foundation for future capability expansion. Next-generation Super Hornet deliveries to the US Navy will begin later this year when the first aircraft from production Lot 30 rolls off the St Louis, Missouri assembly line. "Lot 30 is the launch point for Block II+," says Kory Mathews, director of F/A-18 programme integration. Today's F/A-18E/F Super Hornet was developed from the original F/A-18 Hornet in two stages: first an airframe and engine upgrade that scaled the fighter up by 25% to increase range, payload and growth capacity then a multi-phase avionics update that introduced advanced sensors. Lot 30 is the first time the structural upgrade that produced the F/A-18E/F comes together with the full suite of advanced avionics, and is the jumping-off point for the Capability Flightplan - a roadmap of enhancements planned to be developed and fielded over the next decade. Robust roadmap "We have a robust, well-defined capability roadmap in four main areas: distributed targeting, net-centric operations/battlespace management, sensor integration and advanced weapons," says Mathews. The Flightplan covers fiscal years 2008-2014, and will be updated annually. "It is a living document," he says. "We can add, accelerate or eliminate capabilities." The launching point for the Capability Flightplan is the avionics architecture implemented incrementally since deliveries of the Block II Super Hornet began in 2005 with production Lot 26, and fully realised beginning with Lot 30. The architecture backbone is a fibre-optic data network and advanced mission computer (AMC). Block II+ uses the latest Type 3 AMC, produced by General Dynamics Information Systems, with two times the throughput and memory of the Type 2 computer in Block II Super Hornets. Plugged into this architecture are the new APG-79 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar AAS-46 advanced tactical forward-looking infrared (ATFLIR) pod digital sold-state recorder (DSSR) accurate navigation (ANAV) system and Link 16 multifunctional information distribution system (MIDS). "Beginning with Lot 30, every aircraft will have AESA," says Mathews. Until then, some F/A-18E/Fs are being delivered with the earlier mechanically scanned APG-73 radar. The US Navy plans to retrofit 135 APG-73-equipped Block II Super Hornets with APG-79, for an eventual total of 415 AESA-equipped aircraft. The Raytheon AESA brings the capability for simultaneous air-to-air and air-to-ground operation and, starting with Lot 30, two-seat F/A-18Fs will have the advanced crew station, which decouples the front and rear pits. "The front-seater can sanitise the airspace while the rear-seater conducts an air-to-ground campaign," says Mathews. Both crew members will have the joint helmet-mounted cueing system. Lot 30 also introduces the ANAV box, which replaces the F/A-18's CAINS inertial navigator and MAGR GPS receiver with a tightly integrated system that addresses obsolescence and provides "unprecedented air-to-ground accuracy", says Mathews. Another step in expanding the Super Hornet's precision attack capability has already been taken with fielding of the digital sold-state recorder. Replacing an analogue pit video recorder, the DSSR brings the capability to grab and store sensor images, and send them over existing communications links - either Link 16 or the ARC-210 digital radio. "On ingress, the crew can see ATFLIR streaming video in the pit, frame-grab a still image of the target and datalink it to the forward air controller, who looks at the image, annotates it with Blue Force positions and datalinks it back," Mathews says, cutting the time needed to "talk" the aircraft to the target to "low-digit minutes". With the Lot 30 aircraft as a starting point, the Flightplan lays out a roadmap for expanding the F/A-18E/F's precision-engagement and battle-management capabilities. Much of the focus is on air-to-ground operations, but the Super Hornet is to get an infrared search and track (IRST) sensor to increase air-to-air capability. Development of the IRST is funded beginning in FY2008, leading to fielding in 2012-13, says Mathews. A targeting, not imaging sensor,
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3   NEXT
DarthAmerica       9/14/2007 8:23:50 AM

The F-35 is smaller, Nan.  The Super Bug has more wing area but I'm fairly certain is the same size as the standard Bug (and both are smaller than the F-14).  The F-22 is larger than the F-15 it replaces, but that's because it has to carry all that stuff internally.

 

Big does seem the way to go these days...the Flanker series are rather large for fighters, while the Typhoon and the Rafale are about the same size as the aircraft they replace (the Tornado F.3 and the Mirage F.1/Jaguar, respectively).  The Gripen is the only 4th gen fighter that seems to be smaller than its predecessor, the Viggen.  It really is a tiny thing!

 



The Super Hornet is actually the roughly the size of an F-14/15 roughly. Its ~2 ft shorter. Big is definately the trend and its one of the chief limitations of some aircraft. The Super Hornet was built big on purpose.
 
 
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       9/14/2007 8:29:45 AM

Interesting , very good news fot the US Pilots , they will enjoy the Beast !



""The architecture backbone is a fibre-optic data
network and advanced mission computer (AMC). Block II+ uses the latest
Type 3 AMC, produced by General Dynamics Information Systems, with two
times the throughput and memory of the Type 2 computer in Block II
Super Hornets.

Plugged into this architecture are the new APG-79 active
electronically scanned array (AESA) radar AAS-46 advanced tactical
forward-looking infrared (ATFLIR) pod digital sold-state recorder
(DSSR) accurate navigation (ANAV) system and Link 16 multifunctional
information distribution system (MIDS). ""



Well , that is impressive . Well done USA :-)



""
"The front-seater can sanitise the airspace while the rear-seater conducts an air-to-ground campaign," says Mathews.""

Welcome into the M2000/Rafale age .

NIETHER RAFALE OR M2000 have this capability.

""
Another step in expanding the Super Hornet's
precision attack capability has already been taken with fielding of the
digital sold-state recorder. Replacing an analogue pit video recorder,
the DSSR brings the capability to grab and store sensor images, and
send them over existing communications links""

It reminds me what the French AdA had since M2000N ... (in use also in M2000Bs and Rafales)

NIETHER RAFALE OR M2000 have this capability.


""
"On ingress, the crew can see ATFLIR streaming
video in the pit, frame-grab a still image of the target and datalink
it to the forward air controller, who looks at the image, annotates it
with Blue Force positions and datalinks it back," Mathews says, cutting
the time needed to "talk" the aircraft to the target to "low-digit
minutes". ""

Nice to hear , the SHs have now the same capability than Rafale , welcome again .

NIETHER RAFALE OR M2000 have this capability.


""
Much of the focus is on air-to-ground
operations, but the Super Hornet is to get an infrared search and track
(IRST) sensor to increase air-to-air capability.""

Really ?! That is just about time , lol !

This is actually an improved capability. All US tactical aircraft carry podded IRST.

""
Development of the IRST is funded beginning in FY2008, leading to fielding in 2012-13, says Mathews""

lol ! A dollar late .



The rest of the post is of the utmost importance . It brings new light
on tactical air warfare from the USA and it is looking good . China
should read , watch and learn .



Cheers .



 
Quote    Reply

apoorexcuse    Big Fighters   9/14/2007 8:37:58 AM




The F-35 is smaller, Nan.  The Super Bug has more wing area but I'm fairly certain is the same size as the standard Bug (and both are smaller than the F-14).  The F-22 is larger than the F-15 it replaces, but that's because it has to carry all that stuff internally.



 



Big does seem the way to go these days...the Flanker series are rather large for fighters, while the Typhoon and the Rafale are about the same size as the aircraft they replace (the Tornado F.3 and the Mirage F.1/Jaguar, respectively).  The Gripen is the only 4th gen fighter that seems to be smaller than its predecessor, the Viggen.  It really is a tiny thing!



 





The Super Hornet is actually the roughly the size of an F-14/15 roughly. Its ~2 ft shorter. Big is definately the trend and its one of the chief limitations of some aircraft. The Super Hornet was built big on purpose.

 

 

-DA

This reminds me of a biography I read in high school with several chapters about early SEAD.  The early experiments involved drills and hole saws poking through sheet metal, F105's.  As time (and aircraft design) advanced, though fighters got larger they were more packed with gear, namely the F4..  So space had to be compromised more and more for what was installed.  Up till now where there little room left in any part (and I certainly wouldnt mod any new fighter with only a hole saw) to do those experiments.  I wish I could remember the book.  After a little searching I still cant find it.

 
Quote    Reply

apoorexcuse       9/14/2007 8:44:45 AM
Anyways, while fighters do get larger, there is not necessarily more room available for future upgrades, unless planned for ahead of time.  Look at the F22, giant fighter, but not much in the way of wasted space internally.  Whereas those beautiful works of *deadly* art circa 1940's to 50's while smaller, had much more in the way of unused internal space.


 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       9/14/2007 9:10:51 AM

Anyways, while fighters do get larger, there is not necessarily more room available for future upgrades, unless planned for ahead of time.  Look at the F22, giant fighter, but not much in the way of wasted space internally.  Whereas those beautiful works of *deadly* art circa 1940's to 50's while smaller, had much more in the way of unused internal space.



Look at the Super Hornet design history. IIRC space was made available specifically for upgrades.
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    F-22 upgrades   9/14/2007 9:18:52 AM
As it actually is for the F-22. Just one example: by block 30 that radar she carries will look NOTHING like what the Block 10s carry. WHOLE different setup planned with vastly increased area coverage.

Herald
 
Quote    Reply

apoorexcuse    DA   9/14/2007 9:19:50 AM
Exactly, it had to be planned for.  One of my former employers has a long history, and retains an internal museum of its various products (one of which was used for the initial manual core samples on our nearest solar neighbor...).  Their products are a fantastic example of products (residential, commercial, industrial, military) becoming increasingly space/volume/mass efficient over time.  This to the point where in order to add a feature or an upgrade requires its own significant project because there is no location available for an unplanned improvement.  Not being a part of the aerospace industry, I can only imagine that now common place event is more magnified.  So we trade product efficiency for overhead overload, oftentimes.

 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Herald Reply   9/14/2007 9:29:53 AM

As it actually is for the F-22. Just one example: by block 30 that radar she carries will look NOTHING like what the Block 10s carry. WHOLE different setup planned with vastly increased area coverage.

Herald


I'd like to see conformal arrays on F-22/35, F/A-18E/F, EA-18G and APG-77 in the F-15E.
 
 
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Herald Reply   9/14/2007 9:37:04 AM

Exactly, it had to be planned for.  One of my former employers has a long history, and retains an internal museum of its various products (one of which was used for the initial manual core samples on our nearest solar neighbor...).  Their products are a fantastic example of products (residential, commercial, industrial, military) becoming increasingly space/volume/mass efficient over time.  This to the point where in order to add a feature or an upgrade requires its own significant project because there is no location available for an unplanned improvement.  Not being a part of the aerospace industry, I can only imagine that now common place event is more magnified.  So we trade product efficiency for overhead overload, oftentimes.


Its best if planned for for sure. Experience has taught that. Additional space was built into the F-22/35/18E for these reasons.
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234       9/14/2007 9:50:25 AM



As it actually is for the F-22. Just one example: by block 30 that radar she carries will look NOTHING like what the Block 10s carry. WHOLE different setup planned with vastly increased area coverage.

Herald



I'd like to see conformal arrays on F-22/35, F/A-18E/F, EA-18G and APG-77 in the F-15E.

 

 

-DA

For the F-22, I CONFIRM  conformals are her future. F-35?  I don't know about her or the others; we'll be flying UCAV slaves into A2A by the time those changes show up for the air fleet we have. We may build new ucav slaves  with conformals and use AWACs or satellites  for masters  to lob the A2A and A2G  ordnance we  fling at the clowns who shouldn't be in our sky or in our way on the ground.

I just don't know which way the USAF will jump on that one.

I prefer to  SMASH the enemy with mass as well as precision. So a mixed manned master/robot slave air force is MY preference.

Herald

 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics