Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Pakistan Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: the Pakistan armed forces Verus the Indian armed force in all aspects
soldier of god    11/28/2005 8:03:19 PM
hello I am in the army my rank is captain. WE will start of with small arms the G3 vs the INSAS the G3 has a range of about 1,312 feet its rate of fire is 800 rounds per minute. The INSAS has range of about 1,112 feet. The G3 has can fire single or full auto. The INSAS can fire single or three round burst. Why not full auto because the indian generals think that their troops will waste to much ammunition. The G3 is has more recoil than the INSAS but thats because the G3 has a bigger round then the INSAS. Those are the facts whether you like them are not. Know the heavy machines the MG3 vs the BREN. The MG3 has a range of about 1,512 feet its rate of fire is 1,200 rounds per minute . The bren has a range of about 1,298 feet its rate of fire is about 1,111 rounds per minute. I can not tell you about the recoil because i have never fired them. Also the Bren is a WW2 gun and a large number of indian troops still use this gun today. Know we move to main battle tank this is where india cannot match pakistan . The AL KHALID VS the Argun tank the AL KHlAID tank has already been devoleped the argun tank still has not been devoleped. The Al KHALID has 125mm Gun and has all the latest equipment that most western tanks have. Pakistan already has an edge over india a in land war.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT
HoundOfHello    RE:Pakcapt ROFL   11/29/2005 7:37:48 PM
"Every time india has invaded pakistan so pakistan has always played a defensive role."-Capt. Ignorant Hmm let's review the last 4 conflicts. 1947/48: Pakistan and tribals invade INDEPENDENT AND SOVEREIGN Kashmir. India intercedes after Kashmir signs the instrument of accession. 1965: Pakistani tanks enter the Rann of Kachh. 1971: Pakistanis launch preemptive airstrikes against Indian bases in the Western Theater. 1999: Pakistani NLI invades and occupies the Kargil heights. IAF and Indian Army give them the boot. Pak Army gives democratically elected Nawaz Sharif the boot and Mushy mush passes the blame to him. Of course, all of these aggressions took place after Pakistan was invaded by regiments of invisible Indian inferior para-commandos who were immediately cut to pieces by pakistani schoolboys right? Nice to see that you read your army (story)textbooks cover to cover. The Mullahs must feel very safe with officers of your intellectual caliber guarding the madrassahs. -HoH
 
Quote    Reply

HoundOfHello    RE:Pakcapt ROFL   11/29/2005 9:08:12 PM
"Try to talk tough on the battlefield. Then we will see how tough you really are."-Mujahideen Well I'm getting ready to fill out my application to West Point. Hopefully by the time I graduate the WoT will be focused on the terrorist nation of Pakistan. Then we'll talk all we want. On the other hand, my family wouldn't want to talk tough on the battlefield. We've never been that eloquent and Marathi is a tricky language to pen flowing poems or philosophical thoughts in. My uncles, cousin, grandfather, great grandfathers and the rest of my proud Maratha ancestors have preferred the deadly speech of the blade and the bullet to back up their mouths, and I intend to continue in that tradition. And by the way, what are you doing on this forum? Don't you have better things to do like hiding OBL, than sitting here lecturing us on "talking tough"? -HoH
 
Quote    Reply

counterstrike    soilder of God   11/29/2005 10:47:40 PM
=============================================================================== >>one pakistan soldier 10 indian soldiers die. Keep saying that Pakistan lost the kargil war<< nut case captain read this, http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/war_in_kargil.pdf US navy report on kargil. And shut up ur good for nothing paki mouth! You say that you are a captain, try to give at least one neutral source that says India lost the war, so much for a captain. >>Keep saying that Pakistan lost the kargil war<< we are quite happy telling the truth! >>you dont know a thing about that war you dont know a thing about military strategy or the battleplan.<< its know harm I don’t know anything about it or I am not going to do anything with it I am a computer engineer and not a terrorist like you and your army are. The problem here is a so called captain doesn’t have an idea about battle plan…LOL >>The main goal was to cut of highway 10 from the indian army. SO pakistan army can bombard the indian postions. Its all about taking stratgic postions something you cannot understand.<< WRONG! Its all about using strategic positions not just taking idiots! A so called captain who doesn’t even know to spell stratEgic posItions ..LOL >>And the pakistan army has always played a defensive role against the indian army I dont know where you got your information that says we never were on the defensive role.<< LOL… really want know?? From you idiotic captain so what were your army doing deep inside Indian Territory. Fishing?? Read this dumb headed captain: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_7-9-2005_pg3_1 your air Marshall accepting it was Pakistan which attacked India in 1965 and couldn’t even sustain the war because they DIDN’T HAVE AMMUNITION so much for your army’s BATTLE PLAN. And you celebrate it as your defense day…LOL >>Every time india has invaded pakistan so pakistan has always played a defensive role.<< like 1971..LOL >>And I have told you earlier I have been in the Army for 12 years. Yes the Pakistan army. I am a commisoned officer. And yes I am a captain.<< who doubted it?? I even said you qualify to be a General mate. That’s because you work for the Pakistani army, so much for your brains!! And for your kind info it is commissIoned and not commisoned. A captain who doesn’t know to spell “strategy” perfect fit for Pakistani army!
 
Quote    Reply

counterstrike    RE:soilder of God   11/30/2005 8:01:00 AM
>>Counter strike I have not been rude to you guys why are you rude to me<< :) somebody talked about being tough on battle feild! >>You dont know anything those sites are wrong my freind. You really dont know anything about battleplanes<< come on! you call the american NAvy site and your own Daily times and Air marshal Nur Khan wrong! the give me the correct site! and yes I don't even have an Idea of battle plans that are meant to be failures! >>ANd what I meant to say was india lost the kargil war I already told you the reasons. You cannot deny them because they are true<< and what were the reasons you exactly gave! that you were inside indian territory & had strategic positions well my goodness! I these are the reasons to win a Battle then why fight it?? and you call yourself a captian and I think you will won't fight if india held stratergic positions and were inside pakistan territory because according to you one would be defeated in that case!
 
Quote    Reply

HoundOfHello    RE:soilder of God   11/30/2005 9:37:13 PM
"Why would I lie I have no reason to lie."-Mujahideen Hmmm. Maybe as a feeble attempt to salvage whatever scraps of honor your country has left after 50 yrs of idiocy. -HoH
 
Quote    Reply

kommando    RE:the Pakistan armed forces Verus the Indian armed force in all aspects   1/19/2006 5:14:23 AM
hahahahah!!! no wonder the paki army is in such sorry state...its own officers live in fools paradise... remeber Kargil captain... your own PM agreed in an interview who lost... as for your comparisons ..laughable...otherwise you guys would have captured Kashmir ages ago...
 
Quote    Reply

InterArmaEnimSilent    RE:the Pakistan armed forces Verus the Indian armed force in all aspects   1/19/2006 11:51:34 AM
as i remember it, wans't it india's PM who got down on his knees and begged his baap, Clinton to bail them out
 
Quote    Reply

pulkit_patriot       12/28/2006 9:11:32 AM

The only reason you would want to put up a t-90 against AL KHALID is because the t90 is al little better in speed and mobilty. I will tell you right know that pakistani soldier is way better shooter than a indian shooter. How do I know this because I have seen it happen and it is a fact that the indians are poor shots. I have been in the army for 12 years know. And you indians think you are really that tough just because you talk tough on the computer. When you come to traing camp we will see how tough you really are you will probaly urinet in your pants. Agree with me or not pakistan does have an edge over india in a land war.


Well captain, if pakistanis are such good shooters, why the hell 2000 of them along with 60 tanks could not take up an indian outpost with only 120 men and two recoilless guns guarding it.

LINK
 
Quote    Reply

killmaster    Indian Army deserves a little more respect   5/31/2007 3:08:19 PM
NO WONDER BECAUSE OF PAKISTAN ARMY 'S HUGE TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITY AND EFFICIENCY ,IT LOST IN EVERY SINGLE WAR   IT FOUGHT WITH THE INDIANS .YOUR ARMY IS GOOD FOR NOTHING AND I MEAN IT" NOTHING".IF UR ARMY HAD ATLEAST WON A SINGLE WAR I WOULD HAVE HAD ATLEAST SOME SYMPATHY FOR U GUYS.PLEASE DO THE INDIAN ARMY A FAVOUR DON'T DOWNGRADE THE CAPABILITIES OF THE INDIAN ARMY BY COMPARING IT WITH P.ARMY IT WOULD BE A GRAVE INJUSTICE TO THEM ,THEY OUGHT TO BE COMPARED WITH CHINA "[UR BOSS]"OR BRITIAN,THE TIME'S ARE CHANGING INDIAN ARMY IS MILES AHEAD OF U.OF COURSE NUCLEAR CAPABILITY ISSUE SHOULD NOT BE EMBEDDED HERE.
 
GET UR LADS SOME PROPER TRAINING AND PUT A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT IN PLACE .......
AND STOPING LIVING IN A FANTASY WORLD!!!!!!THIS IS FOR REAL.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

killmaster    Indian Army deserves a little more respect   5/31/2007 3:13:25 PM
I can't believe dat pakistani military officers are in such a sorry state,living in FANTASY WORLD.Get out of it man.Ever heard an Indian army officer talk like that, atleast i haven't.Feel sorry for u.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics