The word doublespeak was coined in the early 1950s. It is often incorrectly attributed to George Orwell and his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The word actually never appears in that novel; Orwell did, however, coin Newspeak, Oldspeak, duckspeak (speaking from the throat without thinking 'like a duck') and doublethink (holding "...simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them..."), and his novel made fashionable composite nouns with speak as the second element, which were previously unknown in English. It was therefore just a matter of time before someone came up with doublespeak. Doublespeak may be considered, in Orwell's lexicography, as the B vocabulary of Newspeak, words "deliberately constructed for political purposes: words, that is to say, which not only had in every case a political implication, but were intended to impose a desirable mental attitude upon the person using them."

Yes, I can be more original.  I stole that line from "Scrubs", and I rather like to use it when people are talking inane crap. 

Swhitebull, lets face it, you are an extreme Right wing Israel supporter.  There is nothing wrong with being Right wing on its own, and there is nothing wrong with supporting Israel.  I am slightly to the Right, and I support Israel.  You however are are of the extreme Right, and are foaming at the mouth rabid in your support of Israel.  It can be fun to play devils advocate with you, however you are so entrenched in your hatred of the Palestinians/Arabs that you create anti-Israeli sentiment.  Nobody likes a rabid person.  It doesn't surprise me that you should leap to the defence of someone slandering Muslims, however weak their argument.

Sofa, you are right in that Racism isn't quite the word.  However I am at a loss to think of a term describing someone who is so biased against a religion.  You can talk about doublespeak and quote Wikipida until you are blue in the face, it does nothing to advance your argument.  Everybody who has access to the Mass Media let alone more straight speaking sources knows the stories about Muslim extremists preaching hatred.  Equally everyone knows there are many Muslims who are terrorists, or who support terrorists.  This however will never stop their being many, many Muslims (in Western Europe and elsewhere) who are peace loving people, and who have no connection to extremism.  To try to argue that all Muslims are terrorists or terrorist supporters is utterly inane.  To compare Islam to Nazism is slanderous.  We fought the German military in WWII because they were commanded by a Nazi administration.  This is while Al Queda, or any other extremist Muslim element, does not command all Muslims.  It does not matter exactly what Allah is supposed to have said, nor does it matter what exactly is written in the Koran.  If you read the Bible you will find the Old Testament full of violence, and the promotion of violence, "an eye for an eye", and all that.  Yet, nobody is suggesting all Christians are terrorists and want to take over the world.  Quite the opposite, most Christians are peaceful.

It is not I who am naive, it is you.  Rabid people, extremists in your own right, love to portray things as black or white, in this case implying all Muslims are terrorists, or alternatively the Palestinians are utterly in the wrong and the Israelis have no blemish to the name.  Well, the world is not black and white.  There are peaceful Muslims in the UK, and no matter how you try to slander their name in claiming they are "infrastructure" to the terrorists, this does not make it so.  In effect you are spreading race hatred, which is a criminal offence under UK law.