Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
World War II - Japan Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Quite True!
Desertmole    7/9/2006 2:09:57 AM
It was a definite learning curve. I doubt we would have lost the Lexington had similar damage been inflicted later in the war. One thing the Navy was quite good at was capturing lessons learned from each ship that sank. IIRC, the trick of flooding gas lines with CO2 was developed on the Lex or Yorktown. The point I was trying to make was that even pre-war we took damage control more seriously than many nations. Clearly the Japanese did not take the same view, and paid dearly for it.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Cato    RE:Quite True!   7/10/2006 1:29:32 AM
Two words... Fog Nozzle
 
Quote    Reply

Photon       4/13/2009 12:38:47 AM
I think the differing attitudes extends beyond the respective carrier design philosophies.  You can pretty much say the same about the difference between A6M Zero and the Cat series of naval fighters.  Undoubtedly, the former was master of tight-turning dogfights as it was very nimble and had excellent range until the latter part of the war.  Unfortunately, Zero was not armored and especially lacked self-sealing fuel cells (these two things were left out to achieve better maneuverability and range).  By contrast, the less nimble American counterpart had these two key systems, which turned out to become very important.  (On the plus side, the American counterparts generally had superior climbing and diving rates.)
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics