Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Commandos and Special Operations Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: NAVY SEALS VS BRITISH SAS
LJ813    7/1/2005 9:34:17 PM
I WILL GO FOR THE NAVY..
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
cwDeici       12/24/2010 2:51:48 PM
The SAS is insanely good, and famous for it, but the RMC being comarable to SEALs? Well, that's either lack of knowledge or patriotism/nationalism speaking.
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       12/24/2010 3:10:41 PM

The SAS have never failed on a mission. Great history and tradition from the days of David Sterling in the western desert till now. Elite military tactics were all developed by SAS. HALO,is an sas innovation. Remember Falklands war SAS units jumped from 40,000 feet into the freezing south atlantic in the dead of night and swam 2 miles to shore to disrupt Argentine forces on land. Has SEALS ever done anything like that successfully? Remember the SAS unit in Iraq that was descovered behind enemy lines by the kid who they refused to kill. They took on the Iraqi forces and traveled nearly 200 miles or so eluding the Iraqis  to the Syrian border,only 2 of them survived but they killed a lot of Iraqi's for each SAS man killed.There are a lot of counter insergence operations the SAS do we dont even know about. If you are a terrorist and they are sent to get you they are going to get you. Also each SAS man is not only trained but highly skilled in a vast varity of weapons You can do a lot of TRAINING but accumplishing the mission is another thing. To answer one post, if the British wanted to take an oil rig from terrorists they would use the SBS. The Special Air Service motto "He who dares wins" is not a joke.

Great post, but being unwilling to shoot a kid who later showed such ingratitude or enough incompetence to snitch on them may have been a mistake and cost lives on both sides, though of course in most ways it was the morally correct thing to do.
 
Anyho, the reason I'm replying is due to the covert nature of special forces missions, especially SAS counterterrorist mission I very much doubt they have never failed one.  
 
Quote    Reply

Chad       1/6/2011 5:03:01 PM
Your wrong about that yes b.u.d. training is like 6 weeks but thats just the basic training it takes alot longer than 6 weeks to become a navy seal it takes more like a year maybe 2 they are trained in pretty much everything.
 
Quote    Reply

Chad       1/8/2011 8:17:20 PM
Navy Seals are far more elite then the royal marine commandos and there just as good if not better than the British  S.A.S.
 
Quote    Reply

JTR~~    @Chad   1/21/2011 3:54:09 PM

Navy Seals are far more elite then the royal marine commandos and there just as good if not better than the British  S.A.S.


blinded by Pro US media propaganda i see.
 
Quote    Reply

prezbucky    CIA SOG   2/3/2011 1:21:50 AM
 
Quote    Reply

prezbucky       2/3/2011 6:15:22 PM
(sorry -- I tried posting last night from the iphone and could only write in the "Reply Title" field.)
 
So -- I see the brits tend to think their forces are better and the Americans tend to back theirs.
 
Let's start at the top. I don't know the Brit units as well so past the very top level, I'm not sure
 
American and British Unit hierarchy
 
Level 1. Delta & DEVGRU vs. SAS & SBS
Level 2. US Army Special Forces & SEALs & Force Recon vs. British Marine Commandos(?)
Level 3: US Army Rangers vs. British ?
 
I have a few questions:
 
1) Assuming that Delta (AKA "CAG") is at least slightly better than Army Special Forces (AKA "Green Berets"), and that Delta is fairly even with SAS, is it safe to assume that SAS is definitely better than Army Special Forces?
 
2) Assuming DEVGRU is just a notch above the SEALs, and if SEALs and SBS are about even, can we assume that DEVGRU is a notch above SBS?
 
And this is more of an original question -- I haven't seen this anywhere on the interwebs:
 
3) Are Army Rangers and regular US Marines about even? I have heard that Marines are better trained than regular Army troops; are they as well trained as Rangers then?
 
And...
 
4) Since it seems CIA's Special Operations Group (SOG) pulls most of their operatives from Delta/Special Forces/DEVGRU (etc.), are they as capable as any of the aforementioned groups... even Delta and SAS?
 
Thanks in advance for conscientious answers.
 
 
Quote    Reply

moughoun1       2/7/2011 7:37:27 PM

The SAS have never failed on a mission. Great history and tradition from the days of David Sterling in the western desert till now. Elite military tactics were all developed by SAS. HALO,is an sas innovation. Remember Falklands war SAS units jumped from 40,000 feet into the freezing south atlantic in the dead of night and swam 2 miles to shore to disrupt Argentine forces on land. Has SEALS ever done anything like that successfully? Remember the SAS unit in Iraq that was descovered behind enemy lines by the kid who they refused to kill. They took on the Iraqi forces and traveled nearly 200 miles or so eluding the Iraqis  to the Syrian border,only 2 of them survived but they killed a lot of Iraqi's for each SAS man killed.There are a lot of counter insergence operations the SAS do we dont even know about. If you are a terrorist and they are sent to get you they are going to get you. Also each SAS man is not only trained but highly skilled in a vast varity of weapons You can do a lot of TRAINING but accumplishing the mission is another thing. To answer one post, if the British wanted to take an oil rig from terrorists they would use the SBS. The Special Air Service motto "He who dares wins" is not a joke.
Who told you the SAS have never failed in a mission...because that person is full of bovine excrement.
 
And HALO jumping was not invented by the SAS ....That's like saying combat swimming was invented by the SBS.
 
Quote    Reply

moughoun1       2/7/2011 7:51:03 PM

(sorry -- I tried posting last night from the iphone and could only write in the "Reply Title" field.)

 

So -- I see the brits tend to think their forces are better and the Americans tend to back theirs.

 

Let's start at the top. I don't know the Brit units as well so past the very top level, I'm not sure

 

American and British Unit hierarchy

 

Level 1. Delta & DEVGRU vs. SAS & SBS
 Yes roughly, along with various other more clandestine units
 

Level 2. US Army Special Forces & SEALs & Force Recon vs. British Marine Commandos(?)
No, US army SF and "regular" SEAL's overlap with D force/DEVGRU/SAS/SBS, bar more attention paid to CT/HR various other bit's and bobs in those "tier 1" units....There isn't some cool guy bar where only the Tier 1 guys sit around blowing smoke up each others arse's.
British RM commandos are raiders and shock troops, more like a specialised USMC, elite yes, SF ect no.

Level 3: US Army Rangers vs. British ?
SFSG......

 

I have a few questions:

 

1) Assuming that Delta (AKA "CAG") is at least slightly better than Army Special Forces (AKA "Green Berets"), and that Delta is fairly even with SAS, is it safe to assume that SAS is definitely better than Army Special Forces?
Wrong assumption, different jobs, different guys...You want a guerrilla army raised  call SF, you want a plane take down HR call CAG, you want to do a long range desert penetration raid...call a Blade.
They do over lap in some things, but the reason to have separate units was to specialise towards one or two areas seemingly neglected by earlier units.
 

2) Assuming DEVGRU is just a notch above the SEALs, and if SEALs and SBS are about even, can we assume that DEVGRU is a notch above SBS?
Again different priorities, some do things "better" then others and so on
 

And this is more of an original question -- I haven't seen this anywhere on the interwebs:

 

3) Are Army Rangers and regular US Marines about even? I have heard that Marines are better trained than regular Army troops; are they as well trained as Rangers then?
You want an amphibious assault call a Marine, you want an airfield take down call a Battboy.

 

And...

 

4) Since it seems CIA's Special Operations Group (SOG) pulls most of their operatives from Delta/Special Forces/DEVGRU (etc.), are they as capable as any of the aforementioned groups... even Delta and SAS?
No comment......
 

Thanks in advance for conscientious answers.

 

I hate rating, but I will try to give you equivalent unit to unit breakdown.
 
Quote    Reply

wildcard    Navy SEALs VS British SAS   2/26/2011 4:50:35 PM

Navy SEALs training is 6 months o BUDs and 18 months of SEAL School, BUDs is open to the media to show the training which is basically physical.

SEAL school is not open to anyone, the training is kept a secret and SEALs do not discuss that part of training with any outsider, this training covers a wide verity highly skilled abilities.

There are two separate schools, one on the East coast, the other on the West, but training takes place at many locations for specialized portions of the school.

When they say only 3 out of a hundred make the cut, they are not joking, 100% is not good enough, you must be willing and able to give 150% and still keep going.

 Two words do not exist in the life of a SEAL, the word ?quit? and ?failure?, neither one is an option, each Team is capable of working alone or with another Team.

Our job, ?We take out the trash?, our saying, ?Don?t run, you?ll only die tired? and our slogan ?HooYah?.

When you say ?SEAL? there is nothing else to say.

MCPO Retired

SEAL Team 3

Class 65  

 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics