You have fallen in love with the things that have destroyed men Laziness and an inflated ego

You have fallen in love with the things that have destroyed men Laziness and an inflated ego Let's examine your statement briefly: Laziness Braddock -Provides zero sources for his work other than an occasional newspaper article or a reference to classic strategist. -Provides no html formatting or editing from his paste and cut from MS Word or another word processing program, making his posts difficult to wade through and to attribute who said what in a message. Shek -Provides numerous sources and hyperlinks to allow his facts to be checked by all. -Provides html formatting to set off quotes, attribute statements to the appropriate author, provide active, one-click hyperlinks, and make it as easy as possible for a reader to cruise through a posted message. Inflated ego Braddock -Constantly refers to himself as the best and brightest. -Refers to his contacts as the best and brightest in America, citing their extreme influence, even though their positions don't place them within adminstration circles. -Attaches names such as Caesar, Makaveli[sic], Alexander, and other well known historical leaders to his name. -Still refers to his ARNG rank even though he is no longer entitled to said rank. Shek -Makes no claim to greatness or superiority over others (except for superior arguments over Braddock due to actually providing facts, context, and analysis that can be followed). -Doesn't rely on name dropping or references to his own accomplishments except when absolutely appropriate (e.g. when talking about Iraq, he refers to specific experiences in Iraq that are germane to the topic at hand, although this isn't really talking about an accomplishment, but rather just referring to experience); instead, relies on the merits of the argument to do the talking. Please let me know if I've missed something, but it's looking like you're trying to project a description of yourself onto me. I know you can do better than that. Try harder next time, and you might get somewhere.

nuff said.

Braddock, You really should take a few moments to collect yourself and advance something that amounts to an argument. I provided an opportunity for you to confirm or deny some statements under your descriptions of "laziness" and "inflated ego" and to add to the list. Instead, you continue your self-projection by claiming I am emotional. So, let's analyze this as well: emotional Braddock -Calls people kids when they don't agree. -Responds with ad hominem attacks, questioning one's experience, knowledge, and credentials. -Avoids arguments that challenge his assertions like the plague. Shek -Responds to messages with facts and analysis with a logical train of though. -Avoids ad hominem attacks, minus an occaisional one directed a Braddock, although they do have merit. -Attacks arguments head on with counterarguments based on facts and analysis. Once again, I find your argument uncompelling and completely lacking on the merits, and instead, descriptive of yourself. Seems like your trying to win a one-legged a$$ kicking contest.

Braddock the Great

"I love it how I drive you crazy" Makaveli: The 7 day Theory Tupac Shakur

Braddock, Demonstrating your ignorance previously by spelling Machiavelli "Makaveli" doesn't drive me crazy. It makes me laugh at what a fraud you are. If you had actually waded through his modes and orders, you would have seen his name several times on the spine of his books and realized how to spell it. Instead, you try to cloak yourself in other's work without even knowing how self-defeating it is. Better luck next time perpetrating your frauds.

Tupac does'nt need your permission to spell the name one of his greatest albums in any way he sees fit. You need to spend more time amongst your subordinates to see why Tupac is on every young soldiers lips. He's one of the great ones and a proponent of Sun Tzu's "Art of War."

Horse Soldier I am going to incorporate the quick action concept and its perepheral MI benefits(to infantry units) into my opus on threat analysis. It is going to be great. Written and produced by yours truly. I will employ the use of traceable bibliographical sources for the kids. Personally, I prefer the off the top of the head "freestyling" we both exhibited yesterday. Ya got skills Horsesoldier!!

Horse Soldier I am going to incorporate the quick action concept and its perepheral MI benefits(to infantry units) into my opus on threat analysis. It is going to be great. Written and produced by yours truly. I will employ the use of traceable bibliographical sources for the kids. Personally, I prefer the off the top of the head "freestyling" we both exhibited yesterday(I was timing your responses). Ya got skills Horsesoldier!!