To answer that, what would or could the American government do if it were an American publishing info about the Aussies?

I think not allot really.

The real crime here is the second rate information security by American secret services.  You should thank good old Bush junior directives for screwing up allot of that.

over 2 million Americans had access to the info that manning had access to. Thanks to Wiki leaks weak American information security will have to be tightened up. No one knows how many unpublished leaks there has been to foreign governments .

Assange has given American security services a bloody nose  but it is just what they needed to sort there act out, you don't see it now because you are very emotional about the issue, but the chap has done you a big favour .

You should note for instance allot of what he has published has been redacted. not the actions of a man bent on destroying America.

Conspiracy theorist might even think it to be an internal plot within America to improve security of the America in the long run, after all why direct so much publicity at the Wiki leaks website.

Given that China is going to have a bigger economy than America by 2020, I think America is going needs it's allies more than it ever has in the past so it won't do anything that upsets the populations among key allies.

To answer that, what would or could the American government do if it were an American publishing info about the Aussies?

I think not allot really.

The real crime here is the second rate information security by American secret services.  You should thank good old Bush junior directives for screwing up allot of that.

over 2 million Americans had access to the info that manning had access to. Thanks to Wiki leaks weak American information security will have to be tightened up. No one knows how many unpublished leaks there has been to foreign governments .

Assange has given American security services a bloody nose  but it is just what they needed to sort there act out, you don't see it now because you are very emotional about the issue, but the chap has done you a big favour .

You should note for instance allot of what he has published has been redacted. not the actions of a man bent on destroying America.

Conspiracy theorist might even think it to be an internal plot within America to improve security of the America in the long run, after all why direct so much publicity at the Wiki leaks website.

Given that China is going to have a bigger economy than America by 2020, I think America is going needs it's allies more than it ever has in the past so it won't do anything that upsets the populations among key allies.

Just to reinforce what I stated earlier about State Dept no getting its schitt together...:

WikiLeaks cable dump reveals flaws of State Department's information-sharing tool

By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer

Friday, December 31, 2010; 12:00 AM

Before the infamous leak, the 250,000 State Department cables acquired by anti-secrecy activists resided in a database so obscure that few diplomats had heard of it.

It had a bureaucratic name, Net-Centric Diplomacy, and served an important mission: the rapid sharing of information that could help uncover threats against the United States. But like many bureaucratic inventions, it expanded beyond what its creators had imagined. It also contained risks that no one foresaw.

Millions of people around the world now know that the State Department's secret cables became the property of WikiLeaks. But only recently have investigators understood the critical role played by Net-Centric Diplomacy, a computer initiative that became the conduit for what was perhaps the biggest heist of sensitive U.S. government documents in modern times.

Partly because of its design but also because of confusion among its users, the database became an inadvertent repository for a vast array of State Department cables, including records of the U.S. government's most sensitive discussions with foreign leaders and diplomats. Unfortunately for the department, the system lacked features to detect the unauthorized downloading by Pentagon employees and others of massive amounts of data, according to State Department officials and information-security experts. The result was a disastrous setback for U.S. diplomatic efforts around the globe.

"This was as bad as it gets," said Patrick F. Kennedy, undersecretary of state for management, referring to the diplomatic fallout. "We had, over the course of many years, built up a huge amount of faith and trust. That's ruptured now, all over the world."

U.S. officials and security analysts describe the leak as a cautionary tale, one that underscores flaws in security for secret government data while also exposing a downside to the U.S. government's enthusiastic embrace of information-sharing in the months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Investigations into the attacks concluded that government agencies had failed to share critical information that could have helped uncover the Sept. 11 plot. Because of that lapse, Congress tasked the Office of the Director of National Intelligence with pressuring key government agencies - including the Pentagon, the Homeland Security Department and the State Department - to find ways to rapidly share information that could be relevant to possible terrorist plots and other threats.

The State Department, with its hundreds of diplomatic posts worldwide, was already making tens of thousands of classified cables available to intelligence and military officials with secret security clearances. But in 2005, the DNI and the Defense Department agreed to pay for a new State Department computer database that could allow the agency's cables to flow more easily to other users throughout the federal government.

"It was consistent with the concept of needing to share information after September 11th," said State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley. "We were asked to do it, and the Pentagon paid for it."

Plagued by user errors

Net-Centric Diplomacy was launched in 2006 and tied into a giant Defense Department system known as the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, or SIPRnet. Soon, nearly half a million government employees and contractors with security clearances could tap into the diplomatic cables from computer terminals around the globe.

The State Department's new database quickly garnered praise as a model of interagency collaboration. The database was named a finalist for an Excellence in Government award in 2006. The following year, then-Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte, whose agency led the push for information-sharing, congratulated State Department officials for making their secret cables "available in a timely, user-friendly way."

"The State Department's commitment shows the way for other agencies," Negroponte wrote in a Jan. 29, 2007, letter to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

The flaws did not become apparent until much later. One of biggest problems: Sensitive cables were often dumped willy-nilly into the database regardless of whether they belonged there, according to two department officials familiar with the internal procedures for data storage.

Thousands of cables and other documents pass through Foggy Bottom daily, and to ensure that they are