Military History
|
How To Make War
|
Wars Around the World
Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia
Discussion Board
Return to Topic Page
Subject:
JSF Overview
gf0012-aust
6/15/2010 1:07:35 AM
to follow
Quote
Reply
Show Only Poster Name and Title
Newest to Oldest
Pages:
1
2
Volkodav
6/21/2010 7:31:12 AM
On beautiful fighters ... I saw a Spitfire fly over today. No airshow, just over town. How cool, never seen one before in the air. Maybe in a 60 years someone could say the same about the JSF. Hopefully it isn't still operational in the RAAF.
Used to be a Spitfire as well as a Mustang and Sea Fury turn up for airshows at the locak airport when I was a kid.
There was an exceptional variety of warbirds at Wanaka....still dribbling over the Corsair but prefer the Sea Fury I saw as a kid.
Quote
Reply
Aussiegunneragain
6/22/2010 8:26:04 AM
For the sort of stuff the RAAF is likely to be doing in the coming decade, a silver bullet force of F-35 backed up by SH and HUG Bugs would suit us just fine. Post 2020 F-35 is still the silver bullet, 12 Growlers and 3 or 4 dozen UCAV and / or Gen 4.5+ fighters.
Still leaves us with the most advanced and capable airforce in the region with the added flexibility to change direction towards a future Gen 6 optionally manned type should the strategic situation dictate so post 2030.
Basically if we avoid spending all of our money on one type we also avoid block obsolescence, a single technical problem grounding the entire fleet, a single counter measure or tactic effectively countering our entire force etc.
The F-35, like the F/A-18, F-16, F-15, Typhoon, Gripen, SU-XX, Mig-XX will continue to evolve so buying 100 block 3 F-35s before 2020 will lock us into the early model without the potential to incrementally supplement the force with newer types as required.
I know the reasoning for wanting to stagger the purchase and used to agree with the logic, but given the size of our airforce I now don't think we can afford to. We cannot rely on the SH's providing any more than parity, if that, beyond 2015 or at the outside 2020. By then we have to expect that the SU-XX will have all of the avionics systems and weapons that the SH and Strike Eagle are getting now and probably with RCS reduction features, on top of an aerodynamically better airframe than the SH has. We cannot rely on significant numbers of those not being purchased in our Region. We also have to plan for offensive jammer versions being purchased.
It is all very well to say that a "silver bullet" force of F-35s can handle that, but with only 40 or so we have very little reserve capability. For example, what do we do in this instance that a surprise strike on RAAF Tindal knocks out nearly half the
F-35 fleet in their hangers? We would be down to a force of maybe 24 F-35s as the only type that has a significant performance advantage over a potentially much larger number of enemy aircraft
I see that as being a conservative scenario, if the T-50 comes along quicker than we expect we could be caught short like we did with our Meteors against the Mig-15s in Korea. .
Quote
Reply
Volkodav
6/24/2010 6:43:39 AM
I see that as being a conservative scenario, if the T-50 comes along quicker than we expect we could be caught short like we did with our Meteors against the Mig-15s in Korea. .
Interesting you should bring up the Meteor as I was actually thinking of it as an example as to why we should reduce our F-35 buy. My thinking was that we had put all of our eggs in one basket with the Vampire post WWII which, supported by our remaining Mustangs, was what we had when Korea started. The Meteor was a stop gap we acquired because although better options had been available prior to the onset of Korea, we had blown our cash on too many ultimately unnecessary (unsuitable) Mustangs and vampires.
By running three overlapping generations of fighters we could have continually replaced the oldest, least capable with the latest and greatest, without breaking the bank.
Had we gone for limited, silver bullet force of Vampires or Meteors capping a force made up of CAC CA-15s and Mustangs we would have been in a possition to be looking at the Sabre to replace the Vampire / Meteor as the silver bullet from 1950, with the older aircraft cascading down through to the retirement (or transfer to the reserves) of the Mustangs.
Intitially it would have been a new type (or updated model) every 5 years through the 40's and 50's, before stablising to 10 year intervals from the 60's. i.e
1948 - Vampire, CA-15, Mustang
1950 - Sabre, Vampire, CA-15
1955 - Hunter, Sabre , Vampire
1960 - Crusader, Hunter, Sabre
1970 - Phantom, Crusader, Hunter
1980 - Eagle, Phantom, Crusader
1990 - Hornet, Eagle, Phantom
2000 - Gripen, Hornet, Eagle
Not set in concrete as there were lots of options such as the F-16 instead of Hornet, but you get the idea.
We currently have the oportunity to start from here
2020 - F-35A, F/A-18F, F/A-18A
Quote
Reply
1
2
Latest
News
Most
Read
Most
Commented
Hot
Topics
INFORMATION WARFARE: A Hack To Die For
SEA TRANSPORTATION: Missiles, Tankers Or Terror
AIR DEFENSE: Integrated Multi-Threat Defense System
COUNTER-TERRORISM: The Chinese Loyal Wingman
INDIA-PAKISTAN: Fragile States
SURFACE FORCES : Turkey The Warship Exporter
YEMEN: Faction Satisfaction
AIR DEFENSE: Pantsir Gets Patched
SYRIA: Brutal And Hated Shia Overlords
INTELLIGENCE: Underestimating The FBI
PHILIPPINES: Twilight Of The Terrors
WARPLANES: South Korea Becomes The 11th
WINNING: Grounded By Incorrigible Corruption
FORCES: Making The Old New Again
LEADERSHIP: Desperately Seeks Stealth Success
INTELLIGENCE: Big Brother Plays Defense
CHINA: The Largely Lethal Long View
SUBMARINES: Let Sleeping Bears Be, Shoot The Rest
LIBYA: Follow The Money, Militias and Mercs
ARMOR: Brazil
IRAN: For All The Wrong Reasons
SUPPORT: Mighty Wings Fading Away
WARS UPDATE: Myths To Die For
ATTRITION: Pain And Frustration
MURPHY'S LAW: Elderly MiGs Rejected By Everyone
PEACE TIME: Droid Moves Like A Dog
SUBMARINES: South Korean Super Subs
THAILAND: The Constants
INTELLIGENCE: Scrutinizing Chinese Electronics
ALGERIA: The Old Guard Says No
Subscribe to Our RSS Feed
Information Warfare: A Hack To Die For
Sea Transportation: Missiles, Tankers Or Terror
Air Defense: Integrated Multi-Threat Defense System
WARS India-Pakistan: Fragile States
Counter-Terrorism: The Chinese Loyal Wingman
Surface Forces: Turkey The Warship Exporter
WARS Nigeria: Pirates Preparing To Escalate
Air Defense: Pantsir Gets Patched
Submarines
WARS Yemen: Faction Satisfaction
Intelligence: Underestimating The FBI
WARS Syria: Brutal And Hated Shia Overlords
Naval Air
Warplanes
Special Operations
Marines
AIR DEFENSE: Integrated Multi-Threat Defense System
INDIA-PAKISTAN: Fragile States
INTELLIGENCE: Underestimating The FBI
SYRIA: Brutal And Hated Shia Overlords
SURFACE FORCES : Turkey The Warship Exporter
WINNING: Grounded By Incorrigible Corruption
WARPLANES: South Korea Becomes The 11th
PHILIPPINES: Twilight Of The Terrors
AIR DEFENSE: Pantsir Gets Patched
YEMEN: Faction Satisfaction
COUNTER-TERRORISM: The Chinese Loyal Wingman
SEA TRANSPORTATION: Missiles, Tankers Or Terror
INFORMATION WARFARE: A Hack To Die For
Dirty Little Links: News Links.
News
How To Make War
Wars Around The World
Austin Bay's On Point
StrategyTalk
Dirty Little Secrets
Features
Al Nofi's CIC
Videos
Photos
Jokes
Community
Military Discussion Boards
Military Jokes
Military Photos
Military Book Reviews
StrategyPage
Account Manager
Login
Feedback
About Us
Search
Advertise With Us
Search