Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Troops aren't assassinating Taliban
Volkodav    8/26/2009 4:50:38 AM
August 26, 2009 Article from: Australian Associated Press AUSTRALIAN special forces troops aren't in the business of assassination and have not assassinated Taliban leaders in Afghanistan, said Defence head Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston. Air Chief Marshal Houston said he rejected media suggestions that members of the Special Operations Task Group (SOTG) in Afghanistan had assassinated Taliban leaders. The Australian Defence Force has issued a series of statements revealing that the SOTG had been responsible for the deaths of some two dozen Taliban leaders and bomb makers over the last year. The latest occurred yesterday when it was disclosed that Mullah Abdul Karim, an insurgent commander known to be directly responsible for numerous attacks against Australian and Afghan forces, had been killed in an operation on August 10. Air Chief Marshal Houston said Australian forces made every effort to capture insurgents. "We don't indulge in assassination," he told reporters in Canberra. "What we do is we go out and we disrupt the Taliban. "When we come across those people, we endeavour to capture them. Sometimes they resist very strongly, in which case they usually end up second best. It is not assassination." Defence Minister John Faulkner backed the work of Australian special forces saying the role was absolutely critical. He said Australia provided the largest number of special force in Afghanistan, after the US. Senator Faulkner said the minimal disruption to the recent Afghan election was to the great credit of Australian special forces and other Australian troops. "They are doing an absolutely magnificent job. The work they are doing is critically important to security in Oruzgan province and I know it is greatly valued by the US and our partners in regional command south," he said.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Cyrus       8/26/2009 8:38:49 AM
wouldnt have a problem with it if they did
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       8/26/2009 9:11:06 AM

One of the few good point about extremists is the don't tend to surrender meaning there is no need to plan to assassinate them, you just try to capture them and they do the rest.

 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain       8/26/2009 9:23:53 AM

One of the few good point about extremists is the don't tend to surrender meaning there is no need to plan to assassinate them, you just try to capture them and they do the rest.



Yes but its a shame they have to put the troops at greater risk closing to capture them when the same result can be achieved from 1000 metres with a sniper bullet.
 
Quote    Reply

Aussie Diggermark 2       8/26/2009 10:35:34 PM




One of the few good point about extremists is the don't tend to surrender meaning there is no need to plan to assassinate them, you just try to capture them and they do the rest.







Yes but its a shame they have to put the troops at greater risk closing to capture them when the same result can be achieved from 1000 metres with a sniper bullet.


Who says that a bullet from 1000m's is not the case? All missions have adequate force protection measures in place... 
 
It is all about how one decides to word the press releases old boy...
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       8/27/2009 2:53:37 AM
It is all about how one decides to word the press releases old boy...

check email

 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics