Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Shornet announcement tomorrow morning
gf0012-aust    2/26/2009 5:03:28 AM
compliments of abe, via T5C, via press release: DEFENCE MINISTER TO MAKE MAJOR CAPABILITY ANNOUNCEMENT IN RELATION TO AUSTRALIA’S FUTURE AIR COMBAT CAPABILITY Who: The Hon Joel Fitzgibbon MP, Minister for Defence. What: Defence Minister will a make major capability announcement, whilst welcoming the Boeing and United States Navy Super Hornet team, visiting Australia for the Australian International Air Show. Where: RAAF Base Williamtown, Medowie Road, Williamtown. When: Friday, 27 February 2009. Time: 7:30am. Media should gather at the security gate for pass issue. The Minister will meet the Super Hornet team, which is in Australia for the Australian International Airshow at Avalon, Victoria, on 10-15 March 2009. A United States Navy early model Block I F/A-18F Super Hornet and one of the Royal Australian Air Force’s classic F/A-18 Hornet aircraft will be on display.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6   NEXT
Enterpriser       2/26/2009 7:12:38 AM
Thanks for the heads up G.
 
I think I can guess what it will be, but it is still technically precipitous given the White Paper isn't due til April or so......
 
Brett.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       2/26/2009 3:30:01 PM

Thanks for the heads up G.
I think I can guess what it will be, but it is still technically precipitous given the White Paper isn't due til April or so......

Brett
.
Politics is kicking in, otherwise they would have waited for Avalon.  Thats when these things (air) get announced usually.
It's a the dog and pony "deflection" show....

 
Quote    Reply

hairy man       2/27/2009 1:35:21 AM

February 27, 2009

Article from:  Australian Associated Press

TWELVE of 24 Boeing Super Hornets on order for the RAAF are to be rewired to give them an advanced electronic warfare capability.

Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon announced the Government would spend $35 million for the aircraft to be modified as they move down the Boeing production line in the US.

That's a far cheaper option than seeking to modify the aircraft once in service.

What the RAAF will get are F/A-18F Super Hornets able to be upgraded to full EA-18G Growler configuration, comparable to the Growlers now entering service with the US Navy.

"If finally pursued, the relatively small investment will significantly enhance the Super Hornets capability, by giving electronic attack capacity and therefore the ability to nullify the systems of opposing aircraft," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

"It will also provide the Super Hornets with counter-terrorism capability through the ability to shut down the ground-based communications and bomb triggering devices of terrorists."

Once modified, the RAAF aircraft could be upgraded to full Growler capability through acquisition of electronic warfare pods.

Mr Fitzgibbon said that would cost an additional $300 million with a decision likely to be made in the upcoming Defence white paper, set for release in March or April.

This would give Australia an extremely advanced airborne electronic attack capability, far in excess of any regional power.

Much of the information about electronic attack remains highly classified.

Some reports suggest it would allow a hostile aircraft or ground radar to be jammed or even spoofed through inserting false data. Hostile missiles could be distracted away from their real targets or even made to attack their own side.

Under plans launched by the former coalition government, the RAAF's ageing F-111 bombers will be retired in 2010.

The RAAF's current fleet of F/A-18 Hornets will remain in service but will be gradually replaced by the new Lockheed F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) from 2015.

To ensure there was no capability gap between retirement of the F-111s and the arrival of the JSF, the former government ordered the 24 Super Hornets at a cost of $6 billion.

The first Australian Super Hornets will be delivered next year.

The Growler is similar to the conventional Super Hornet. Other than the extra internal wiring, the key difference is that it has no gun, with the space taken by dedicated electronic attack components.

For the RAAF, the gun would apparently remain, but with wiring to allow later installation of the electronics.

A yet to be resolved issue is whether the US would agree to sell Australia some of its most advanced electronic equipment.

A Defence source said the fact that the US had agreed to the installation of the wiring left them confident other equipment could be supplied.
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       2/27/2009 7:02:59 AM
And here I was expecting to be hearing they had ordered another 24 to 36 aircraft and delayed the F-35 decission until 2015.
 
Quote    Reply

DropBear       2/27/2009 1:11:44 PM
 
 Woohoo!!!   http://www.strategypage.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Images/emthup.gif" align="absMiddle" border="0" alt="" />  http://www.strategypage.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Images/emthup.gif" align="absMiddle" border="0" alt="" />  http://www.strategypage.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Images/emthup.gif" align="absMiddle" border="0" alt="" />
 
Quote    Reply

AdvanceAustralia       2/27/2009 1:34:59 PM
So after all the carry on by Labor (in both opposition and government) that the previous Government was wasting money buying SHs they now admit it was a good idea?
 
Cheers.
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       2/27/2009 6:39:22 PM
 
So after all the carry on by Labor (in both opposition and government) that the previous Government was wasting money buying SHs they now admit it was a good idea?
 
Cheers.
 
Well they are still saying it was a rushed and that had the issue of replacing the F-111 been tackled earlier other options could have been considered. 
 
I remember various options being raised over the years, F/A-18D in the early 90's, strike roled Typhoons with conformal tanks on the early 2000's.  Even the suggestion in the mid 90's that we should buy into the F-22 program to replace the Legacy Bugs in the air to air role, allowing them to concentrate on strike.
 
The biggest failure by previous governments, of various persuasions, in maintaining our regional overmatch was in not providing for a robust aerial tanking capability or a viable AEW force.  With tankers and AEW upgraded Skyhawks would be more effective than either the HUG BUG or SH without this support.
 
Well upgraded Skyhawks are a bit of a stretch, but you get my drift.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       2/27/2009 6:53:58 PM
Well upgraded Skyhawks are a bit of a stretch, but you get my drift.


at the time they would have been good FACs and fast jet trainers...
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       2/27/2009 8:40:15 PM
Well, short of surplus B-1B's nothing available to the RAAF in the last 20 years could seriously replace the F-111 without a corresponding purchase of a substantial number of tankers.  Without tankers it was basically impossible to replace the F-111 without a substantial reduction in our effective offensive radius.
 
In the same vein, if we already had a robust tanker capability, we could have bought any one of a number of suitable strike aircraft to replace the F-111 at any time from the late 80's.  The lack of tankers making AUP and the F-111G buy more attractive than replacement.
 
On AEW, I would go so far as to suggest that the AEW / AMRAAM combos possessed by Singapore and now Thailand, would give them a greater edge over any regional Flanker force than our HUG BUG's or SH's would have.  How much better off would we be now had we converted half a dozen surplus P-3B's into AEWC platforms in the 80's?
 
Throw in another what if.  The F-111 order was cancelled in the late 60's and we bought the three squadrons of F-4E's, one of RF-4C(E?)'s and one of KC-135's that were quoted as the required force to substitute for the 24 F-111C's + 6 RF-111's that were on order or optioned.  Going with Phantoms would have forced the retirement of 2 SQN's Canberra's and possibly the disbandment of one of the, then four, Mirage squadrons, but how useful would those Phantoms and Tankers have been in comparison?  Eagles/Beagles, Bugs, or Tornado's could have gone onto replace the Phantoms, while Tigersharks, Gripens, or even AMX/HARRIER/A-10 could have replaced the Miricles and the current discussion would be whether to life extend or replace the tankers and AEW's.
 
Off topic I know but I'm bored.
 
Quote    Reply

Aussie Diggermark 2       2/27/2009 10:09:17 PM

Thanks for the heads up G.

 

I think I can guess what it will be, but it is still technically precipitous given the White Paper isn't due til April or so......

 

Brett.


Boeing's St Louis based F/A-18F production line doesn't care about our White Paper...
 
:)
 

 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics