Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Defence audit finds $3bn to cut
Volkodav    1/13/2009 9:17:10 AM
Mark Dodd | January 14, 2009 Article from: The Australian A RUTHLESS independent audit of the defence budget recommends cutting spending by $3billion and slashing the number of civilian staff employed by a department renowned for its lack of accountability and billion-dollar blowouts. Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon is examining the draft independent audit, designed to bring the department into line with the Rudd Government's efficiency demands. Defence sources, who asked not to be named, said annual spending, now running at $24billion, could be cut by up to $3billion. The Australian understands the audit is also recommending a big reduction in the number of civilian staff employed by Defence, which has skyrocketed since 2001 to about 20,000. "Defence are going to go ballistic when they get this," a senior analyst said yesterday. "They'll fight it tooth and nail." A government official familiar with the draft yesterday denied the size of the proposed cuts. The sweeping proposals are contained in the Pappas McKinsey defence budget audit, which Mr Fitzgibbon implemented last May amid concerns over the number of troubled defence acquisitions initiated by the Howard government and the need for greater efficiency, especially in project management. That need was underlined last year when the Rudd Government axed the navy's long-delayed Seasprite helicopter contract, which had cost more than $1billion. But it was not alone. The list of other delayed or troubled billion-dollar defence contracts is long. George Pappas, a former senior vice-president of Boston Consulting Group, has been hailed as a good choice for the job of making savings in one of the Government's most demanding areas. "His independent audit will be a key tool in our efforts to put the dysfunctional defence budget we've inherited back on track," Mr Fitzgibbon told the National Press Club in July. With total defence spending of $24 billion last year, demands for more efficiency have been spurred by the onset of the global financial crisis. The Rudd Government is also committed to 3per cent real annual growth in Defence's underlying funding base to 2015-16. Opposition defence spokesman David Johnston said that pledge had been undermined by a demand that Defence find $10billion in savings in the next 10 years. A senior defence analyst familiar with the audit's recommended $3 billion budget cuts said they were feasible. "In one year, I suspect it is," he said. "If you look at the underspend last year -- about $1billion -- and then the total dearth of (new contract) approvals, what, since the Rudd Government has been in power, has been approved? I do know from a senior Defence guy that Pappas has been really putting the pressure on them and putting them through the hoops. "(Pappas) knew where to go and look for efficiencies and he was looking deeper than just the balance sheet; he was looking at management structure." Allan Behm, a former head of the Defence Department's international policy and strategy division, said considerable savings could be achieved in several areas, ranging from excessive air travel to inadequate contract management. _______________________________________________________________ I like the bit about excessive air travel...I know of a number of recent examples of critical personnel not beingable to attend meetings because there was no money available to fly them there.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
gf0012-aust       1/14/2009 3:23:56 PM
I seriously doubt that any of this has got legs.  We're short staffed and can't get people - in fact they run the real risk of projects going belly up if we can't get more engineers.

Our operational budget is going up, and they can't get people to sustain what we have.   

they're asking us to tell friends and family about jobs because the open market won't deliver.  
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       1/17/2009 5:04:33 AM
they're asking us to tell friends and family about jobs because the open market won't deliver.  
 
Tell me too please http://www.strategypage.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Images/emwink.gif" align="absMiddle" border="0" alt="" />
 
I am getting sick of waiting for entrenched baby boomers to move on where I am.  Even considering a move to the West if that will help.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       1/17/2009 7:14:24 AM
they advertised for engineers in last weeks canb times.  I think the cutoff for a response is 22/1/.09
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       1/17/2009 10:30:13 AM
Too bad I'm not a professional engineer....only got a diploma plus not quite the right mix of additional subjects to claim an advanced dip.  Well to be exact I have a couple of dip level quals but unfortunately I fall short for Eng Aust requirements for CEngO.
 
Time to go back to school I think.
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain       1/17/2009 9:13:55 PM

I seriously doubt that any of this has got legs.  We're short staffed and can't get people - in fact they run the real risk of projects going belly up if we can't get more engineers.


Our operational budget is going up, and they can't get people to sustain what we have.   
 

they're asking us to tell friends and family about jobs because the open market won't deliver.  

The problem that I see in the broader PS is that key areas often can't get appropropriate personel but there are other areas that are so irrelevant that they just dead wood and should be cut entirely. The problem is also that the personel in those areas may not be suitable just to move into the areas where there are staff shortages. The trick is to shed the $3 bil by only cutting the dead wood and by leaving the right staff in place in the worthwhile areas.
Anyway, I'd predict that your engineering shortage will be solved (at least temporarily) with the recession over the next year or so, when all those IT compainy's, mining companies, car manufacturers etc have to shed staff.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics