Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: ASLAV MLU
Volkodav    12/13/2008 1:06:14 AM
I recently read some info on plans for an ASLAV MLU. The list of options included - Automotive upgrades, to reverse the degadation caused by increased weight (added protection) and hard use. Upgraded armour An integrated defensive suite including ESM and hard kill components. Increased boyancy to return the river and lake crossing amphib capability lost with the weight increases. A fully intergrated vehicle monitoring and control system. and The possibility of manufacturing replacement hulls to a new design. All of this would provide the most advanced and capable CFV in the world but with only an estemated 5 to seven years service life before replacement with the selected LAND 400 solution. Why? Would it not be smarter, less risky and more economical to put the ASLAV fleet though a more limited reset program so they will be able to last their original planned service life while also acquiring a small number of new build Advanced ASLAV's for our front line commitments until the availablity of the LAND 400 CAV solution? If we are talking new power train, new hull, new armour, an intergrated defensive suite and a completely intergrated vehicle control system, with only the turret and main armament being retained; isn't this basically a new vehicle anyway? Why not just replace the current fleet early with new build vehicles of this enhanced design?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3
Aussiegunneragain    More evidence from the professionals on the spot   1/7/2009 10:29:48 AM
Apparently the Canucks are saying that wheeled AFV's don't even cut it for all their ops in Afghanistan and want to get a modern IFV to replace their M-113's. Make sure you read all the links.

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/Canada-Looks-to-Upgrade-Its-Armor-in-Afghanistan-05190/
 
Quote    Reply

Arty Farty       1/8/2009 7:10:33 AM
10 years ago the plan was for an all LAV III armour fleet. Since 2006, they've bought Leo2s, upgraded M-113s and are supposedly in the market for an heavier LAV and new tracked IFV.
Apparently the Canucks are saying that wheeled AFV's don't even cut it for all their ops in Afghanistan and want to get a modern IFV to replace their M-113's. Make sure you read all the links.

 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    AF   1/8/2009 8:01:23 AM

10 years ago the plan was for an all LAV III armour fleet. Since 2006, they've bought Leo2s, upgraded M-113s and are supposedly in the market for an heavier LAV and new tracked IFV.


Apparently the Canucks are saying that wheeled AFV's don't even cut it for all their ops in Afghanistan and want to get a modern IFV to replace their M-113's. Make sure you read all the links.




link target="_blank">

link target="_blank">link




 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    AF   1/8/2009 8:03:32 AM


10 years ago the plan was for an all LAV III armour fleet. Since 2006, they've bought Leo2s, upgraded M-113s and are supposedly in the market for an heavier LAV and new tracked IFV.




Apparently the Canucks are saying that wheeled AFV's don't even cut it for all their ops in Afghanistan and want to get a modern IFV to replace their M-113's. Make sure you read all the links.







link target="_blank">link target="_blank">


link target="_blank">link target="_blank">link








 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics