Two screnarios relating to the effects of Turky in the EU
exerpt of "Exerpts From Expedient policies and the War Against Islam Terrorism" published at http://www.eshoju.org
A horrific mistake which is currently being promoted by President Bush and many of the European politicians is the admittance of Turkey to the European Union. Europe already is at peril due to its irresponsible immigration policies having allowed for large Islamic communities to form within its borders, which as earlier shown constitute a fifth column undermining Europe’s internal security strongly hampering its ability to effectively defend itself from Islamic imperialism.
Turkey currently is being praised as living proof of how an Islamic Democracy can exist and serve as a shining example for the Middle East. Certainly it is true that the State of Ataturk is a secular one with strong ties to the West, just like pre-Islam Revolution Iran was considered a stabilizing factor in the region.
Just like Iran under the Shah the Turkish State rests on an enlightened ruling elite reinforced by a well organized and rather repressive security system, not unlike the Iranian Savak, which until now has shown to be effective in curtailing Islam from becoming predominant. In fact Turkish policies towards Islamisation of the State are much harsher by far as in Europe and The States. Paradoxical in order for Turkey to be considered acceptable to the European Union it is urged to cut down on its curtailment of the Islam as a political factor and thereby removing the very instruments which have been proven effective in the past.
Two basic scenarios can be identified, each of which will proof disastrous to the European identity, internal security and integrity:
1. The Turkish secular state survives due to strong internal policies curtailing the threat of an Islamic revolution. The direct consequence of which consists of migration of Turkish Muslim Activists into the rest of Europe where legislation is far more favorable for organization and development of the required infra-structure for activism. Due to the right of each Union Citizen to migrate into any of the Union States while exercising full citizens rights in their new country of residence, there is no legal means stopping Islamic groups establishing themselves in EU countries lacking suitable legislation curtailing their strive for the establishment of an Islamic State. Given that most European Countries already are cursed by large Islamic Communities that at least to a degree act as an fifth column the prospect of a dramatically increased size of such Communities is detrimental to any attempt to deal with the threat posed by Islam terrorism while rendering a policy assimilation, an indispensable requirement as outlined previously, hopeless from the start.
2. The Turkish State, due to increased internal pressures in conjunction with EU imposed weakening of the internal security system, at some point in time turns into an Islamic State, either by popular vote or an Iranian styled revolution, a strong Islamic Fundamentalist fraction would take seat in the European Parliament which would link up with Islamic parties in some of the member states, such as for example the AEL in Belgium. This in conjunction with a very serious growth of Islamic Communities in the member states would turn Europe practically defenseless.
The full article can be found at http://www.eshoju.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=156
|