Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Military Science Fiction Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Would you rather a Bradley or AT-ST???
TriggaFingaz    3/14/2004 5:29:23 AM
Which would any of you prefer for a scout vehicle- an M3A-2 Bradley or an AT-ST 'chicken walker' from Return of the Jedi??? I'd stay clear from the AT-ST. It's height betrays it to observers, so does the noise of its legs which are louder than tracks. Also, it gets unbalanced too easily!!! Stick with the M3A-2, I love the M242 25mm to blaster cannons.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3   NEXT
CoolDude    RE:Would you rather a Bradley or AT-ST???   4/15/2004 8:13:07 PM
Well considering that 2 logs swinging down from a tree can smash the AT-ST in half like a twig, I'd go for the BRadley. Plus, AT-ST has room for what, like 2 men?
 
Quote    Reply

MisterClock    RE:Would you rather a Bradley or AT-ST???   4/26/2004 8:28:33 PM
Bradley, definitely.
 
Quote    Reply

mudshark    RE:I know star wars is not real I know star wars is    4/27/2004 1:05:46 PM
I know star wars is not real I know star wars is not real I know star wars is not real o.k. If we have ships with the fire power of the imperial star destroyers ,then any ground force would be utterly redundant as a directed energy weapon could pin point, and destroy with out collateral damage. So ground forces would only be needed to police the planet. as we know the empire is all about intimidation and the at st and at at do the job nicely. o.k I know star wars is not real I know star wars is not real I know star wars is not real
 
Quote    Reply

fullamongo    RE:I know star wars is not real I know star wars is    4/29/2004 7:56:43 PM
I'd go for the Republican Air Cav seen in Episode 2. Straight out of Apocalipce Now! "Love the morning smell of napalm i do" Oh Mudshark. You need someone to hold the land after you capture it hence an army. plus Star Destroyers have to de-activatee their shields to fire making them vunerable to Ion Cannon fire.
 
Quote    Reply

mudshark    RE:O THATS GREAT THAT IS   4/30/2004 11:36:42 AM
There I was on the bridge of my star destroyer being served by semi naked bimbos, Picking of insurgents extremists members of the Taliban, and any one else that disagrees with me sending down a few at st`s jest to put the wind up them, should they forged about my Omnipotent`s then what happens somebody gets a bloody ion cannon and im dust GREAT!
 
Quote    Reply

fullamongo    RE:O THATS GREAT THAT IS   4/30/2004 4:59:06 PM
Yeah that ion cannon is a bitch
 
Quote    Reply

Warhammer    RE:O THATS GREAT THAT IS   6/7/2004 11:59:27 PM
That is why you have not one, but a fleet of star destroyers to watch your back. Though really, you wouldn't have to do more than perform a flyby in a star destroyer to have all the terrorists s*** their pants as their caves crumble down about them. Then you drop shiploads of ninja droids in the mountains to hunt down every last heat source warmer than the sheep bin laden cuddles with every night. Then the US secretly sells a star destroyer to bother Israel AND Taiwan and see who else in the world s*** their pants.
 
Quote    Reply

trib    RE:O THATS GREAT THAT IS   6/18/2004 8:02:23 AM
AT-ST is supposed to be a light scout vehicule, with at least enough power to fight, so like any scout it can be crushed easily (I know it's strange to talk of an at st as light due to his size but hey, it's the empire :) ) I'll definitly go better with an AT AT wich is more resistant. as for the blaster in swg, i definitly prefer the pahser in star trek, since a single type 2 hand phaser can dig across several meter of rock easily. Same thing for the star destroyer, a good defiant class starship can kick his butt very easily :)
 
Quote    Reply

Finnish_jäger       4/24/2010 3:02:57 PM

AT-ST is supposed to be a light scout vehicule, with at least enough power to fight, so like any scout it can be crushed easily (I know it's strange to talk of an at st as light due to his size but hey, it's the empire :) )

I'll definitly go better with an AT AT wich is more resistant.

as for the blaster in swg, i definitly prefer the pahser in star trek, since a single type 2 hand phaser can dig across several meter of rock easily.
Same thing for the star destroyer, a good defiant class starship can kick his butt very easily :)
About firepower of ships. Star wars ship firepower is at Gigaton to Teraton range. Star trek ships are from kiloton to megaton range. Where is your source for hand phaser digging through  Several meters of rock?
 
Quote    Reply

Finnish_jäger       4/24/2010 3:04:43 PM



AT-ST is supposed to be a light scout vehicule, with at least enough power to fight, so like any scout it can be crushed easily (I know it's strange to talk of an at st as light due to his size but hey, it's the empire :) )




I'll definitly go better with an AT AT wich is more resistant.




as for the blaster in swg, i definitly prefer the pahser in star trek, since a single type 2 hand phaser can dig across several meter of rock easily.


Same thing for the star destroyer, a good defiant class starship can kick his butt very easily :)

About firepower of ships. Star wars ship firepower is at Gigaton to Teraton range. Star trek ships are from kiloton to megaton range. Where is your source for hand phaser digging through  Several meters of rock?


 There Should be "and" at begining of last sentence.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics