Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Israel Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Jewish Sovereignty
Ezekiel    11/29/2007 9:42:58 AM
Why is it such a polemical and emotional discussion? Arguably the first nation-state, as well as having ancient, verifiable and well documented history become so controversial? It seems to me that Jewish Power is the root of this discussion, for the Jews themselves; and those that would much rather they revert back to the powerlessness that identified their position for two millenia. But the question remains....WHY IS POWER SUCH A PROBLEM WHEN IT COMES TO THE JEWS HAVING IT OR EXERTING IT???
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6   NEXT
jastayme3       12/2/2007 6:17:26 PM

No, no, no, Jastayme, you don't get it! Palynological evidence is weak and inconclusive and there's evidence of contamination by wind-borne European species, although the plurality of the pollen grains lifted by sticky tape belonged to Gundelia tournefortii, a pretty but thorny Mediterranean species that does not grow west of Greece.
http://www.flora.huji.ac.il/static//5/46/0013465.002.jpg">
Fact is that the cloth has impression of actual flowers, that together are representative of the flora of the hill area between Jerusalem and Hebron. These imprints are easily identifiable. Either these flowers were part of the funerary ritual, or were placed with the body in order to ensure the completeness of a Jewish burial: any blood dripping from the cross had to be collected and buried, and this custom is still observed today. Whenever there's a meatbombing, you'll see the ZaQ"A Orthodox rescue service swabbing the place to make sure that no human remains are left unburied. Gundelia was placed to the right of the body, and appears to be wound as, well, the actual Crown of Thorns.
All the flowers identified on the shroud belong to the area, and blossom in the relevant season, that of Passover during which the Crucifixion took place.
That is interesting. Hope you find out more.

 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    Shirrush   12/2/2007 11:23:13 PM
You've sent me to hitting the research stacks like a student. For the life of me, if that is proven upon peer review, I have no workable idea how a photographic effect that complete, could be produced by anyone 600 years ago and now I'm expected to explain it for a possible nearly two thousand year old artifact?
 
That is an interesting problem.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Ezekiel       12/3/2007 12:54:26 AM
It is interesting to note that this was originally intended to discuss the problem with Jewish power, more clearly why Jews have such a problem in exerting it, and more largely why the vast majority of the world finds it unacceptable, and instead it has become a question of divinity.....maybe there is an answer somewhere in that (battar I know it isn't proveable).
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    The model diagrammed   12/3/2007 9:09:06 AM
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2197/2083223673_010ee3c968_o.jpg" width=800 border=0>
Some of you have lost me. I can understand most of Heralds physics, though my first reaction to the idea of an extra-universe force acting on the known universe would be to assume that such a force, by definition, is no longer extra-universe but part of the universe it is acting on, so the question is no longer physics but just philosophical drivel.

In a similar vien, if you did prove the existence of god by providing empirical evidence then god is no longer supernatural or holy, but demonstratably part of nature.Which probably explains why no religion has ever attempted to search for such evidence. Ezekial lost me completely, I haven't learned that much about religious beliefs to follow his train of thought but I have a suspicion it was purely theoretical and untestable.

 

For Jastayme3, here is the answer to the one about god creating a stone so massive even he cannot move it.

 

If I gave you a cement mixer and a few bags of cement, can you, Jastayme, create a stone so massive you cannot lift it? I think you can. The question now becomes, can you , god, do what Jastayme just did? I have just demonstrated the the task required is not impossible.  If god says yes, then he can't move the stone so is not omnipotent. If he says no, he can't do what Jastayme just did so is not omnipotent.  The conclusion is NOT that god is not omnipotent. The conclusion is that the term "omnipotent" is a logical contradiction, thus cannot be used to accurately describe anything.


As you can see the logic involved  in hypothesizing is based on ice thin observed data. Nevertheless there is nothing yet AFAIK to absolutely prove/disprove the hypothesis assumptions. One thing you must understand: when I use the term universe, I mean this spacetime. There could be other spacetimes out there. I suggest that possibility in order to explain the process of renormalization, and for the symmetry and uncertainty principles to work as well as explain the winking behavior of electrons we see, all using the standard model for the basis.

I LIKE the standard model and that multiverse explanation for this universe's operators. It works. 
 
You cannot extend it beyond our event horizon, though, and that is where the above hypothesis frankly breaks down. You need to be able to see the extra universal object import work into our universe througfh ourt event horizon as a local bounded condition into which the obswerver can enter and leave. 
 
So hypermasses are not part of the possible proof, though the Casimir Effect could be.
 
Questions?
 
Herald 
 
Quote    Reply

jastayme3       12/3/2007 12:14:40 PM

Battar I specifically said that the term "omnipotence"
is defined so as to exclude contradictions. That conclusion was reached
by scholastics hundreds of years ago. Why repeat an asked and answered?
And why do so by boring me with an old chestnut used by professors
to bully inexperienced students?  Show some imagination,  I have already
heard that one before.

 
Quote    Reply

battar    Horsepower   12/3/2007 12:40:49 PM
Ezekiel,
               What do you mean by Jewish power ?  What is this power expected to achieve? A Jewish state? Done that. The IDF? That's Israeli power. Lobbying the US administration? I don't know the answer to that one. Why do you assume that there should be Jewish power? I've never heard of Christian power, but terms like Islamic power and Black power don't always signify Good Things, and I have a suspicion that if there was such a thing as Jewish power it might be used against certain other Jews.
Some of you may remember Rabbi Kahane, who started his career campainging actively against anti-semitism in the US, then moved to bullying Arab residents of the west bank, and he made no secret of the fact that he didn't consider secular Jews as his friends (that's putting it diplomatically - he said there was no place for secularism in the Jewish state, which I took to mean that he wanted me out.)  So what starts out with good intentions may end in tears.
 
Quote    Reply

jastayme3       12/3/2007 2:15:21 PM

Ezekiel,

               What do you mean by Jewish power ?  What is this power expected to achieve? A Jewish state? Done that. The IDF? That's Israeli power. Lobbying the US administration? I don't know the answer to that one. Why do you assume that there should be Jewish power? I've never heard of Christian power, but terms like Islamic power and Black power don't always signify Good Things, and I have a suspicion that if there was such a thing as Jewish power it might be used against certain other Jews.

Some of you may remember Rabbi Kahane, who started his career campainging actively against anti-semitism in the US, then moved to bullying Arab residents of the west bank, and he made no secret of the fact that he didn't consider secular Jews as his friends (that's putting it diplomatically - he said there was no place for secularism in the Jewish state, which I took to mean that he wanted me out.)  So what starts out with good intentions may end in tears.

I presume he meant that he was annoyed that people should find it odd for Jews to have a Sovereign State
of their own, as other ethnic groups do and find the existance of Israel distasteful.  I don't  think Ezekial  is
implying that he is a Kahaneist. He is I presume saying that European anti-nationalism is rather distasteful
especially when it seems to be applied largely to Israel, even though that is because Israelis are more nationalistic at
the moment. In my experience that is usually what Jews mean when they make complaints like that.
I don't think he means Israel must be governed in the manner of Iran.


 
Quote    Reply

jastayme3       12/3/2007 2:16:44 PM
For one thing, if Ezekial was a Kahaneist, he would have a hard time getting along with me; for obvious reasons.
 
Quote    Reply

Ezekiel       12/3/2007 2:33:09 PM

Ezekiel,

               What do you mean by Jewish power ?  What is this power expected to achieve? A Jewish state? Done that. The IDF? That's Israeli power. Lobbying the US administration? I don't know the answer to that one. Why do you assume that there should be Jewish power? I've never heard of Christian power, but terms like Islamic power and Black power don't always signify Good Things, and I have a suspicion that if there was such a thing as Jewish power it might be used against certain other Jews.

Some of you may remember Rabbi Kahane, who started his career campainging actively against anti-semitism in the US, then moved to bullying Arab residents of the west bank, and he made no secret of the fact that he didn't consider secular Jews as his friends (that's putting it diplomatically - he said there was no place for secularism in the Jewish state, which I took to mean that he wanted me out.)  So what starts out with good intentions may end in tears.

If you noticed, the title of this thread is Jewish Soveriegnty... When you quantify Christian power, Islamic power you are discussing religions, and though you are not mistaken that Jewish law has a God component you are not mistaken, but with Jews their is also a national aspect that the above mentions faiths do not have. It is this national aspect which has aroused the new Jew hate of this era. For two thousand years the jews were hated for their faith, today it is anti zionism, it is about Jewish soveriegnty.  You speak of Israel and the IDF as the consummation of power, but the acquisition of power cannot substitute for the exerting of it. What the Jewish generations of 48' bequeathed is not enough.  It seems to me that when it comes to exerting the power,  the Jewish state is hesitant, confused and  unsure when it does exert its power. This is evidenced in the Palestinian aggression, acceptance of the unethical land for peace equation, its refusal to finish its enemy in war, its slavish accordance to US influence etc.

Obviously this starts with the Jewish culture itself that is the midst of a nascent national consciousness that has been out of practice for two millenia. More clearly Jewish culture has been powerless for a long long time and it is just beginning to understand the meaning of power. In the meantime we readily observe a bunch of dilitante leaders making foolish decisions and creating a harsher reality on the ground.

As to your question of what such power is supposed to achieve, well that is the essential question, for me a Jewish guardianship would stand for Jewish interests, what those interests and purposes can be understood by looking at Jewish history, and the beliefs and values that have girded this people throughout human history. In my opinion the Jews have been a beacon of progress in history, Marlon Brando wrote it best in his autobiography that 'One of the great mysteries that has always puzzled me is how Jews, who account for such a tiny fraction of the world's population, have been able to achieve so much and excel in so many different fields - science, music, medicine, literature, arts, business and more....They are an amazing people. Imagine the persecution they endured over the centuries: pogroms, temple burnings, Cossack raids, uprootings of families, their dispersal to the winds and the Holocaust. Yet their culture survived and Jews became by far the most accomplished people per capita that the world has ever produced.'

As we started with sovereignty I think it right we should conclude that sovereignty is the concept of responsibility, and implicit in the definition of responsibility is the idea of having a degree of power in which such a responsibility rests. Now that there is an IDF it has awakened a new prejudice, that is about denying Israel of exerting its power and in the extreme, against the very idea that Jews should have any power whatsoever. This means that Israel now has to grow up and learn how to exert the power it has enherited from the generations previous that successfully acquired it because this new spirit infused in Jewish Hate is starting to rear its ugly head.

As for Kahane I will just say that he has been proven remarkably accurate in his published writings into what would be if Israel continued in its path...
 
Quote    Reply

Ezekiel       12/3/2007 3:15:48 PM

Ezekiel,

               What do you mean by Jewish power ?  What is this power expected to achieve? A Jewish state? Done that. The IDF? That's Israeli power. Lobbying the US administration? I don't know the answer to that one. Why do you assume that there should be Jewish power? I've never heard of Christian power, but terms like Islamic power and Black power don't always signify Good Things, and I have a suspicion that if there was such a thing as Jewish power it might be used against certain other Jews.

Some of you may remember Rabbi Kahane, who started his career campainging actively against anti-semitism in the US, then moved to bullying Arab residents of the west bank, and he made no secret of the fact that he didn't consider secular Jews as his friends (that's putting it diplomatically - he said there was no place for secularism in the Jewish state, which I took to mean that he wanted me out.)  So what starts out with good intentions may end in tears.

If you noticed, the title of this thread is Jewish Soveriegnty... When you quantify Christian power, Islamic power you are discussing religions, and though you are not mistaken that Jewish law has a God component you are not mistaken, but with Jews their is also a national aspect that the above mentions faiths do not have. It is this national aspect which has aroused the new Jew hate of this era. For two thousand years the jews were hated for their faith, today it is anti zionism, it is about Jewish soveriegnty.  You speak of Israel and the IDF as the consummation of power, but the acquisition of power cannot substitute for the exerting of it. What the Jewish generations of 48' bequeathed is not enough.  It seems to me that when it comes to exerting the power,  the Jewish state is hesitant, confused and  unsure when it does exert its power. This is evidenced in the Palestinian aggression, acceptance of the unethical land for peace equation, its refusal to finish its enemy in war, its slavish accordance to US influence etc.

Obviously this starts with the Jewish culture itself that is the midst of a nascent national consciousness that has been out of practice for two millenia. More clearly Jewish culture has been powerless for a long long time and it is just beginning to understand the meaning of power. In the meantime we readily observe a bunch of dilitante leaders making foolish decisions and creating a harsher reality on the ground.

As to your question of what such power is supposed to achieve, well that is the essential question, for me a Jewish guardianship would stand for Jewish interests, what those interests and purposes can be understood by looking at Jewish history, and the beliefs and values that have girded this people throughout human history. In my opinion the Jews have been a beacon of progress in history, Marlon Brando wrote it best in his autobiography that 'One of the great mysteries that has always puzzled me is how Jews, who account for such a tiny fraction of the world's population, have been able to achieve so much and excel in so many different fields - science, music, medicine, literature, arts, business and more....They are an amazing people. Imagine the persecution they endured over the centuries: pogroms, temple burnings, Cossack raids, uprootings of families, their dispersal to the winds and the Holocaust. Yet their culture survived and Jews became by far the most accomplished people per capita that the world has ever produced.'

As we started with sovereignty I think it right we should conclude that sovereignty is the concept of responsibility, and implicit in the definition of responsibility is the idea of having a degree of power in which such a responsibility rests. Now that there is an IDF it has awakened a new prejudice, that is about denying Israel of exerting its power and in the extreme, against the very idea that Jews should have any power whatsoever. This means that Israel now has to grow up and learn how to exert the power it has enherited from the generations previous that successfully acquired it because this new spirit infused in Jewish Hate is starting to rear its ugly head.

As for Kahane I will just say that he has been proven remarkably accurate in his published writings into what would be if Israel continued in its path...
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics