Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Israel Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The Muhamad el-Dura affair: end of the story.
Shirrush    11/3/2004 5:38:29 PM
When the Camp David negotiations broke down in 2000, Arafat bolted and ran directly to Paris, where he had a night time meeting with Chirac. Nothing has ever been published on what these two talked about. A few weeks later, the war began in earnest, and a state-owned TV channel, France 2, soon had footage of the killing of a 12 years old Palestinian child by Israeli machine-gunners near Netzarim in the Gaza strip. Muhammad el-Dura became a symbol of Palestinian victimhood. An independant French-language press agency, Metula News Agency (Ména), has been inquiring extensively into this propaganda fabrication since then. They've had their final report translated to English, duly copyrighted but I'll copy-paste it anyway: Metula News Agency © English La Mena is a press agency offering strategic analyses, proximity reports, and media watch articles Copyright © 2003 Metula News Agency ? News at the top of the page ? Practical Information at the end of the article. Share your comments and reactions with everyone on the Mena forum http://www.menapress.com/forum.php The Al-Dura case : a dramatic conclusion (info # 010311/4EV) [scoop] By Stéphane Juffa © Metula News Agency Translated by Llewellyn Brown A Summary of the facts After three years of research, more than 150 inquiries, interviews and analyses devoted to the France 2 report of 30 September 2000 at the Netzarim Junction, in the Gaza strip, the Ména has published a long series of articles revealing the following elements: The news report produced by Talal Abu-Rahma and Charles Enderlin, asserting that a Palestinian child had been assassinated by Israeli soldiers, and distributed free of charge by a French public television channel around the world is a gross staging, aimed at demonizing Israel and the Israeli army. The soldiers accused by the commentary of the permanent correspondent of FR2 at Jerusalem did not fire a single projectile in the direction of the adult Jamal Al-Dura and the child at his side, as they were completely unaware of their presence on the scene. The supposed authenticity of the report, defended until now by the channel's management, was based on the sole testimony of its reporter Talal Abu-Rahma and principally on the declaration written, filed and ratified by the latter, 3 October 2000, in the presence of the lawyer of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR), Raji Sourani at Gaza. In this declaration, published in its entirety, with sketches of the events to corroborate it, on the Center's web site, Abu-Rahma notably declares : I, the undersigned, Talal Hassan Abu Rahma, resident of the Gaza Strip and who bears ID no. 959852849, give my statement under oath and after having been given legal warning and choice by Lawyer Raji Sourani, on the killing of Mohammed Jamal Al-Durreh and the injuring of his father Jamal Al-Durreh both shot at by the Israeli Occupying Forces.[?] Then, I focused my camera on the child Mohammed Jamal Al-Durreh who was shot in his right leg. His father tried to calm, protect and cover his son with his hands and body. Sometimes, the father Jamal was raising his hands asking for help. Other details of the incident are as they were apparently shown at the film. I spent approximately 27 minutes photographing the incident which took place for 45 minutes. [?] The Metula News Agency, confirming the conclusions of the inquiry appointed by the commander of the southern front of the Israeli army, led by the physicist Nahum Shahaf, has constantly asserted that Abu-Rahma's declaration was a false testimony and that the 27 minutes of film of the incident ? that is to say the filmed documents showing the Israeli soldiers firing in the direction of Jamal Al-Dura and leading to the death of the "child" ? did not exist. Until Friday 22 October, the numerous official appeals made by our agency to FR2 to view the 27 minutes of Abu-Rahma's rushes, as well as our reiterated proposals to compare our respective materials met with a refusal. Furthermore, our agency, supported by the conclusions of our inquiry, has constantly assert that Charles Enderlin's numerous declarations, evoking the existence of this footage of pictures showing the child's death, that the permanent correspondent of FR2 says he edited in order to spare the television spectators, are a fabrication, serving to confer an appearance of authenticity to a fictional event that it contributes to transform into an event reputed to be real. We find a sample of this sort of declaration by Enderlin in the issue 2650, page 10, of the publication Télérama, 25 October : "I edited the death of the child. It was too unbearable. The story was
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6
swhitebull    Karsenty Speaks - Volumes   5/23/2008 3:37:04 PM
French Court Vindicates Al-Dura Hoax Critic  
By Philippe Karsenty
Pajamas Media | Friday, May 23, 2008

 

Just recently, a French court ruled that I did not defame France 2 when I said that its news report was a staged hoax. Because I refused to be brainwashed, I was sued for defamation.

 

This recent victory is a victory for freedom — the freedom to think and to speak one?s mind; the freedom to question what one is told; and the freedom to disbelieve the solemn pronouncements of others when the individual concludes that his reasoning is correct and that the state and the state-run media — and all of the institutions they represent — are wrong.

The al-Dura lie is an assault on our ability to think, to criticize, to evaluate, and finally to reject information — especially the right to reject information on which we base our most cherished assumptions. One of Europe?s most cherished assumptions is that Israel is a vicious Nazi-like entity that deliberately murders Palestinian Arab children. Moreover, polls conducted in Europe have identified Israel as the greatest threat to world peace, greater than Iran and North Korea, Pakistan and Syria. The al-Dura hoax is one of the pillars on which these assumptions rely.

It is ironic that I, a private individual, had to lecture one of France?s most influential TV stations in order to demonstrate that a child cannot move; lift his head, arm, and leg; stare at the camera; and still be considered ?dead? a good 10 seconds after the newscaster tells us ?the child is dead.? One need only look at France 2?s own footage to realize that the ?death? scene was faked.

My only objective was to correct this error. However, on the part of the French media, it turned into a titanic battle against critical thinking and freedom of thought and expression. On my part, it became a battle for the right not to be brainwashed by the French media. Only a few weeks ago, a French television station produced a documentary ?proving? that the al-Dura story is authentic. First, I was compared to a Holocaust denier, and then to the fringe elements that insist that 9/11 was an inside job. I, and others who share my opinion about the story, including Richard Landes, were labeled dangerous extremists and fanatics. All the while, viewers observed the ?dead? boy move exactly as I just described it. I can only conclude that, in France, it is critical thinking that is either dead or dying. Every French citizen should be complaining about this insult to our intelligence. In fact, very few complain because mass brainwashing works. Where are the angry letters to the station for its absurd documentary? Do the citizens of France now believe that a ?dead? boy can move? Or have they merely forgotten how to think and draw their own conclusions?

The right to think, to speak, to evaluate, to accept, and to reject the conclusions of others goes to the very heart of what it means to be free.

Now it is time for France 2 to acknowledge that it created and is continuing to perpetuate the worst anti-Semitic libel of our era. It?s the responsibility of the French government and, ultimately, the responsibility of the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy — who is, for all practical purposes, the chief executive of French public television — to finally reveal the truth.


Philippe Karsenty is the founder and president of Media-Ratings, an agency that closely monitors French media outlets for anti-American and anti-Israeli bias.
 
 
 
swhitebull
 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    NYSlimes - Missing in Action on the Vindication   7/13/2008 11:58:33 AM
from >>
 
 

News Blackout -- NYT Ignores Momentous Pro-Jewish Court Case Win in France


French media loses big court case proving Palestinian propaganda false, New York Times ignores shocking story... Why?

http://conservablogs.com/publiusforum/wp-content/themes/art/aldura.jpg" align="right" vspace="10" border="0" alt="" />France TV 2 has lost a major court case in France that makes the lie to a major piece of Palestinian propaganda. In 2000 an incident occurred in the Palestinian areas that has since been used as propaganda for the Palestinian cause all across the world and the New York Times has repeatedly been a willing host for this propaganda. Now, however, it has been proven that France 2 perpetrated a lie that has given succor to terrorism. And where is the New York Times with this momentous news that proves Israeli innocence? Nowhere to be seen.

In 2000 the Palestinians began what they called the second intifada against Israel, a kick in the teeth to the Israelis seeking only peace. During the early stages of this attack France 2 TV, a state run television station, aired what it claimed was a video of a child and his father being shot and killed by Israeli security forces.

Story Continues Below Ad «

Palestinian sources claimed that what France 2 TV showed the French public and the world was the death of 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura and his father, killed by Israeli security forces. The shock of this small boy being mercilessly shot down by Jews drew condemnation like a lightening rod. Supporters of Palestine the world over were outraged, posters appeared, protests were whipped up, postage stamps with the image of this child's supposed last minutes on Earth were even created in Egypt and Tunisia. The "death" of Muhammad al-Dura rallied support to Palestinians against the Jews. And for the last 8 years the New York Times has been right there with the "news" pushing the story for all its worth.

In 2002, for instance, a Times story told of how little Muhammad al-Dura was a "12-year-old boy from Gaza whose father could not shield him from a hail of Israeli gunfire." In 2000 a Times story told us of frightened Gazan Raji Sourani, director of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, who told a pitiful story of the fear of his own children based on the "death" of little al-Dura.

''Like every child here, they are haunted by the image of Muhammad al-Dura,'' he continued, referring to the 12-year-old boy shot dead as he crouched behind his father -- film that is repeatedly shown on Palestinian and Arab television stations. ''I have never had a gun in my life. But my children -- who are doing pee-pee in their beds -- want me to buy one, because obv

 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics