Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armed Forces of the World Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Israel vs. Iran in an all-out war
jaythehistorian    8/3/2006 12:24:39 PM
WHY ISRAEL WILL decisively defeat IRAN if there is an all-out war. 1.Israel has more than 200 atomic devices vs Iran which may have 1 soon.Even if Iran bought nuclear devices from other rogue states, the retaliation from Israel would be the equivalent of 2,000 plus hiroshimas. 2.The 200 plus Israeli atomic devices are unstoppable by Iran i.e. up to 80 can be launched by submarines and the rest by ICBM or F-15s or F-16s 3.Israel has the world’s most advanced anti-ICBM missle umbrella which may be impenetrable by Iranian Shahib missles . Iran can only deliver their 1-2 atomic warheads by ICBMs with no other delivery capabilities. 4.Israel has a satellite system with multiple types of spy satellites which have reached the limit of possible resolution (defraction limit) generally thought to be about 10 centimeters and their satellite system is all weather. Together with their advanced UAV capabilities , this allows Israel to possess the most detailed photos and real-time imaging of all Iranian military installations . 5.The military technologic difference between Israel and Iran is wide. Israel has about 10% of the world-wide arms export market which based solely on merit and immensely competitive. IF anything, it is nothing short of a miracle and a tremendous tribute to Israel (jewish ) expertise that they sell to so many countries which never take the side of Israel in any dispute. There are those ,who imply much of Israel’s technological edge is due to massive American aid. However, that aid also has restrained the development of Israeli military technology. American military contractors regularly and understandably, attempt to undermine Israeli sale of military technology when it is in direct competition with American contractors’ efforts to sell abroad. Israel might have double the foreign military technologic sales if the US had never blanketly prohibited Israel selling directly to PRC. This is understandable. Iran sells nothing in world wide arms market. Their highly publicized Shahib 3 missle is nothing but a supped up version of the the 63 year old V2 Nazi ballistic missle. Israel supplies Israeli-developed military technology to most of the world’s top militaries including the USA, India, and China. China's J10 fighter is thought to be modeled on Israel’s Lavi.,the Israeli developed Jet fight. In terms of MBTs, Israel possesses 1500 consisting entirely of the modern highly regarded Merkava. Iran has approx. 500 all obsolete models including the T 72. In front-line aircraft Israel has approximately 800 with more than 500 being upgraded F15s and F16s. Israel also possesses in air refueling capabilities. Iran has about 250 front-line combat aircraft consisting mostly of obsolete older US and Russian fighters. It has no known in air refueling capability. Israel also is way ahead in production and use of UAVs and sells various models to many countries including Great Britain. There are other areas of military technology Israel is far more advanced than Iran.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7   NEXT
cwDeici       2/24/2010 9:38:08 PM

You might be right about their development though, I dunno...
Danger is for west europeans nations and USA who rely on gulf oil and Iran has make it clear they want westerners out of the Gulf area.


Very interesting, I hadn't thought of that much. Thanks!
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       2/24/2010 11:18:28 PM
By the by, Jay the Historian has pointed out some Israeli resiliances and Iranian weaknesses.
 
Personally I think Iran would lose unless, to pay homage to an author on global geopolitics aimed at predicting the future, they can get the major world powers off their back properly, and then rebuild and arm up their nation for at least two decades.
 
Iran could do significant damage to Israel in the future if it keeps up its otherwise pathetic national resources on getting nukes, however Israel would still survive since it has second strike deterrence. I'm more worried about the Arab minority in Israel. Israel would not be able to use nukes against them, but I think the IDF can handle them.
 
Short story, Iran's weaknesses make them unable to keep up a conventional war if this elicits a nuclear retaliation. A strategic retaliation would do damage but not enough, unless Iran waits several decades and its regime survives that long.
 
Iran cannot succeed as long as it does not receive intense support from a major world power or manages to call off the sanctions with a fake turn of face.
 
Quote    Reply

JTR~~    everyone is placing too much emphasis on the main details   2/25/2010 1:03:17 PM

By the by, Jay the Historian has pointed out some Israeli resiliances and Iranian weaknesses.

 

Personally I think Iran would lose unless, to pay homage to an author on global geopolitics aimed at predicting the future, they can get the major world powers off their back properly, and then rebuild and arm up their nation for at least two decades.

 

Iran could do significant damage to Israel in the future if it keeps up its otherwise pathetic national resources on getting nukes, however Israel would still survive since it has second strike deterrence. I'm more worried about the Arab minority in Israel. Israel would not be able to use nukes against them, but I think the IDF can handle them.

 

Short story, Iran's weaknesses make them unable to keep up a conventional war if this elicits a nuclear retaliation. A strategic retaliation would do damage but not enough, unless Iran waits several decades and its regime survives that long.

 

Iran cannot succeed as long as it does not receive intense support from a major world power or manages to call off the sanctions with a fake turn of face.


like i said before an israeli war against iran would not be easy. even if the israeli armed forces did win (which is far from certain) it is almost garunteed that other muslim factions and terrorist groups would launch vengance attacks against israel, who like i said before would be in no state to defend itself, on top of this it would also have to maintain a security force in iran to stop public uprisings etc.
it is clear that israel posses the technological advantage and the skill advantage aswell, but there are far too many iranina soldiers for the IDF to deal with, then they would also face the very significant problem of holding the ground that they had taken, which i am sure the israeli forces are not suited to doing.
however i do agree that it would be unlikely that israel would be doing the attacking, this reflects their military doctrine which almost answers the question for us, they much prefer to fight on their terms on a relitavely small scale, and would rather not risk all out open war.
in terms of military support from other nations on behalf of iran, well we know for a start that russia has had several military dealings with iran in the past in the form of the arms trade, i think they might be able to expect the same backing if it came to a war with israel (it happend in the yom kippur war too).
so all im saying is it could go either way, and i dont think that people should completely rule out Iran as a competent opponent, and that the technological superiority on the behalf of israel should not be seen as the decisive winning factor if it came to a war between the two, as i said it could go either way.
 
Quote    Reply

WORLDWAR       4/6/2010 12:10:28 PM
 
Quote    Reply

Spiky    @ Shirrush   4/7/2010 11:52:04 AM
Good post Shirrush.
 
Although, I disagree with one of your statements concerning the U.S. and Iran/Middle East:
 
"The United States,... is too broke and too dispirited to be expected to enter yet another war in the Middle East for the foreseeable future."
 
Yes, the U.S. is dispirited and broke but not to the point of not protecting the vital flow of oil, which you mention in the end, that drives our petrol ravenous economy. The U.S. imports 65% of its oil. More than half of the 65% of the oil we import (55% to be more exact) comes from OPEC countries. Of the 65% of the oil we import, 22%-23% of that 65% is from the Persian Gulf. A disruption to 23% of our oil imports plus the expanding repercussions world wide in cost and market prices would wreak havoc on the U.S. transportation sector and thus the economy. Factors that are important to us today such as unemployment and debt would skyrocket through the stratosphere. So instead of just being dispirited and broke in a recession, if the U.S. did nothing we would be desperate and bankrupt in a major, major depression.
 
If history is any indicator of the U.S. and its pattern of action in the Middle East, the betting man that respects the odds would place his chips on the U.S. getting militarily involved... again.
 
Quote    Reply

jaythehistorian       4/17/2010 12:28:28 PM