Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armed Forces of the World Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: What Can We Do To Fix The US Army?
Softwar    2/13/2009 3:50:26 PM
Besides spares and maint. - Let's go with aviation equipment for starters - the Army needs a replacement for the remaining UH-1 choppers, a new light observation chopper to replace aging Kiowas, upgrades to the AH-64 force, and a new series of heavy lift choppers (or more Chinooks) to maintain air mobile levels. Now armor - we need to upgrade the Stryker and add more to replace low armored HUMVEEs in front line service. Ground transport - better armored trucks seem to be in order here. Artillery - can someone please finallly pick a SP 155 platform that makes sense?? Infantry - we have the M-4 procurement to complete and Geeezzz Louise... replace the 9 MM pistol with the 1911. Buy more 50 cals. Improve local intell - small UAVs, trained translators and handlers instead of tearing around town trying to be nasty. ID systems for both captured enemy as well as friendly forces. Training and logistical support - develop and deploy small unit tactics - these were very ineffective especially in urban environments. A NTC for small unit and urban warfare is in order here. Make use of combat experience vets instead of simply letting them wander off. We did that in WII and Korea - it works and saves lives. Instead, we muster them out after being assured they will not go bezerk and pop a cap in someone. Leadership!!! The patrol and plaster tactics used during OIF took too many casualties and left guys with their butts hanging out without proper communications, air support or control. Officers were slow to utilize unmanned/robot systems - instead they opted to bust down doors with the old bad-ass entry and shoot 'em up. Top brass are more interested in micro managing unit activity than trying to supply them with the tools and turning them loose.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
strat-T21C    the convoy   2/24/2009 11:27:39 AM
that was an exellent example of jr leadership and command delegation. Trusting the nco's and the allowance of innovation is a by-product of lesson's learned and applied. "Well done" from this soldier to those soldiers!
 
Quote    Reply

strat-T21C    further...   2/24/2009 12:22:11 PM
Would that example of Jr. leadership and trusting innovation not be construde(spelling?) as an example of the Army "fixing itself"?
 
Quote    Reply

HERALD1357    Darth replay;   2/24/2009 12:27:55 PM
Your claim of superior knowledge is demonstrably false since you cannot even discuss the common problem parameters convincingly or even explain what you cannot negate. The Iraq convoy routes follow the road and rail routes, yes? The ports are at the SE end of the country's roadnet, yes? The paved roadnet that can sustain burden traffic  is 36,000 miles and concentrated around Baghdad yes? You have bridges as choke points along the main routes yes? You have SINGLE main routes southeast and west.  Etc. etc. etc.   
 
Why do you always try nonsense (I'm  here and i have security clearance" when you are finally cornered by facts I CAN EASILY DIG UP OR KNOW by means that either never occurred to you or that YOU don't know about? WHY?
 
 
http://www.gearthhacks.com/showimage.php?image=112807/991988hundreds_of_trucks.jpg" width="1" height="1" /> 

http://www.pagog.com/pics/2007/july/28/earth13_full.jpg" width="575" height="494" />
 
That is al Basrah by the way.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    gain, you are grabbing at straws. This isn't what I "think", it's what do. Get over your ego, admit you don't know and move on. We don't move through    2/24/2009 1:19:05 PM
 
Quote    Reply

HERALD1357    Reduced to total incoherence are we?   2/24/2009 1:26:12 PM


Good.
 
That is the exact result I wanted.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       2/24/2009 1:50:10 PM
Rather than being incoherent, actually it's plainly obvious what Darth doesn't want to say, and why he doesn't want to say it.  I've never been there so I can't be accused of giving away any operational security sort of issues (not that I think this counts anyway as it's just obvious common sense), but clearly the road route used from Kuwait and whatever other points south must not go through Basra, but rather bypasses the city (I'd presume around it to the west, the only real option).  Considering 3ID and 1MEF pushed north into Iraq during OIF but both by-passed Basra by circling around it to the west (as I recall), then there obviously must be some amount of road network that does this, and this is what we use.  Hence, our LOC doesn't go through Basra.  Of course, it does pass close around it, so unless you want to discuss something specific to the exact roads in question, it seems to me that saying it passes "through" Basra is probably a reasonable approximation if you're just sketching it out in general terms.
 
 
Quote    Reply

HERALD1357    WP answer.   2/24/2009 2:03:46 PM
Quite true, there is a road from Kuwait City that runs right by al Basrah, through Safwan and further roads west, but the point is that Darth knows a bit about by now how I work and what I can access. . You can watch the traffic patterns moving if you know where and with what to look.http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/kuwait_pol96.jpg" width="1060" height="1218" />
 
There are also French services that I use.
 
It isn't hard, WP.
 
It really isn't.
 
Herald
 
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Herald, seriously, your data is cometsly   2/24/2009 3:30:51 PM
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Herald, seriously, you aren't even remotely close to the answer. There is no "Basra", period.   2/24/2009 4:25:57 PM
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics