Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armed Forces of the World Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: France ends role as Superpower??
Le Zookeeper    7/15/2008 12:18:09 AM
As one of the big 5 France was a superpower for a while, but no Rafale sales, Iran nukes, etc and it seems to that France is no longer a power. Last customer for Rafale -India seems to go to F-18? Is it finally over for France as superpower??
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5   NEXT
wjr1       7/15/2008 12:37:10 AM
Yes.
 
Best,
wjr

 
Quote    Reply

Le Zookeeper    wjr i agree   7/15/2008 12:44:04 AM

Yes.

 

Best,

wjr




if france can't deal with Ayatollah's nukes. what superpower?? in 5 years Iran will be able to nuke Paris. Come on France!!! Fight ur own wars.

 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       7/15/2008 4:00:16 AM


if france can't deal with Ayatollah's nukes. what superpower?? in 5 years Iran will be able to nuke Paris. Come on France!!! Fight ur own wars.



the quality of your response indicates to me that you're trolling.  demonstrate a bit more rigour and you might get some serious replies.
 
Quote    Reply

Wicked Chinchilla       7/15/2008 3:02:09 PM
Since WWII there have been two superpowers :  The U.S. and the Soviet Union.  Since the Soviet Union no longer exists its down to one.  France hasnt been a super power for an awfully long time.  You could make the argument that France hasnt been a "superpower" since the colonial era anyway, let alone post WWII. 
 
France was a major power.  France still is a major power.  But, its super power status was lost back at the time of Napoleon. 
 
Quote    Reply

the British Lion       7/15/2008 3:17:22 PM

Since WWII there have been two superpowers :  The U.S. and the Soviet Union.  Since the Soviet Union no longer exists its down to one.  France hasnt been a super power for an awfully long time.  You could make the argument that France hasnt been a "superpower" since the colonial era anyway, let alone post WWII. 

 

France was a major power.  France still is a major power.  But, its super power status was lost back at the time of Napoleon. 


I'm inclined not to agree with that. She certainly lost an awful lot of power when control of Europe was wrested from her grip, but it wasn't long before she regained superpower status, and maintained it until WW2(aside from a few blips along the way, like the Franco-Prussian War).
 
During the 1800's France still had a very sizeable overseas empire, a strong navy, quality army, and a very decent economy. If she wasn't a superpower then we're being very stingy on what defines a superpower. Until the Prussians showed up there were only two nations with any real global power and that was France and Britain. If that doesn't make a superpower then I'm not sure what does. 
 
As for today, I do agree that she lost the title of superpower the same time all European countries did, and that was during World War 2.
 
B.L.
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY       7/15/2008 4:12:51 PM
France ceased being a "Super Power" on 25 June 1940.  It was liberated by Anglo-AMERICAN forces, fought all its subsequent wars with American equipment or American money or both...that is NOT a Super Power.
 
As Wicked Chninchilla points out France is still a major power, nuclear weapons, global reach, global commitments, seat on the UNSC, but it has long ceased being a Super Power.
 
If this causes any French or Francophone angst, sorry but the facts is the facts.  France is in the top 10% of global power brokers, but not any where near being a global power in and of itself....
 
Quote    Reply

the British Lion     JFKY   7/15/2008 4:33:40 PM

France ceased being a "Super Power" on 25 June 1940.  It was liberated by Anglo-AMERICAN forces, fought all its subsequent wars with American equipment or American money or both...that is NOT a Super Power.

 

As Wicked Chninchilla points out France is still a major power, nuclear weapons, global reach, global commitments, seat on the UNSC, but it has long ceased being a Super Power.

 

If this causes any French or Francophone angst, sorry but the facts is the facts.  France is in the top 10% of global power brokers, but not any where near being a global power in and of itself....


Buddy, I agree with everything you said, but was really necessary to capitalize 'American' like that? I'm sure that was just to make a point that America is the only superpower, not France or Britain etc, etc... But it's that kind of thing that upsets people and could cause a nice little flame war. World War 2 was a joint effort, simple as that. 
 
B.L. 
 
Quote    Reply

Heorot       7/15/2008 6:49:35 PM
And the AMERICANS were late. AGAIN!
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY       7/15/2008 7:13:24 PM
Heorot, if you Europeans had taken care of Hitler in 1935, or 1936, or 1938 we Yanks wouldn't have had to be there at all, late or otherwise, but you all were convinced that Herr Hitler , who had "legitimate grievances" could be persuaded to adopt a milder course.  Stunningly that Nice Mr Hitler turned out to be pretty much what Mein Kampf and his speeches made him out to be...be thankful we showed up.  Bottom-Line: Daladier, Chamberlain, Keynes, Oswald Mosely, Le Croix de Feu, all decided that they weren't going to stand up to Les Bosches/Huns, until it was far too late.
 
Well British Lion, sorry, I'm not really a chauvinist, but let's be honest...a significant portion of Britain's tank force was AMERICAN, had it not been for AMERICAN tank deliveries in 1942 Britain might have lost it's Middle East position, I'd bet that a majority of the Combat Aircraft in Britain, after Jan 1944 were AMERICAN, certainly approximately 60% of the Combat Power on the Continent 1944-45 was AMERICAN (by that I mean US forces)....If it had not been for America Britain would have quite possibly lost the war....Not be conquered by the Germans, after the Battle of Britain and then June 1941 not really a possibility, but Britain would have lost its oil and would have been in a position wherein it could not possibly defeat Germany, and so it would have been left with the alternatives of continuing a hopeless fight or seeking an accommodation with Germany.
 
Thank you for standing up to Hitler and holding the line from May 1940 until June 1941, over a year.  Thank you for Churchill.  But the ONLY reason Britain won the war and the only reason France isn't a province of the
Dritte Reich is the efforts of the United States.  It may be painful for Brit's to hear, yes we ought to have stood up sooner, yes we let you get dreadfully beat down, yada yada yada, but in the end only the US had the industrial and financial resources necessary to defeat the Germans, and Britain was going to be a poor, damaged, and indebted nation in 1945 whether or no the US entered the war in 1941 or 1940.
 
Bottom-Line: Remove the US from EITHER World War and Germany prospers, relatively or absolutely, it was the US entry that was DECISIVE to Germany's defeat in both cases. 
 
Quote    Reply

wjr1       7/15/2008 7:43:16 PM
Herot,
 
I do not share it but there is an argument that we would have been better off not coming at all.
 
Protect the UK, let Adolf the Arian kill off Joe the Jerk and die of syphilis in the fullness of time. And the French would get what they so richly deserve -- a little reduction of their ego.
 
The only real downside is that the Jews would have been slaughtered to the last soul. If for no other reason we had to to get involved.
 
It's funny how moral issues -- freeing the French,  saving the Jews and others -- were just fine then but saving the poor slobs in Iraq is evil Bush stuff that brooked no support from the effete EU. I guess it all depends upon who is wearing the chains.
 
Best,
wjr

 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3 4 5   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics