Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Chemical, Biological and Nuclear Weapons Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Biological Warefare
ArtyEngineer    2/21/2006 8:43:50 PM
What would be the best type of disease to use in this manner, would it be something like Ebola as in the film "Outbrake", or something more mundane like a flu virus of some description. To be of any tactical value its going have to be fast acting and highly contagious, ie airborne. Or are bio weapons considerd more in the Strategic weapons category?.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
bsl    RE:Biological Warefare   2/21/2006 11:38:45 PM
Open source discussion of the topic in the strategic literature over the years have mentioned smallpox as a good starting point for conventional research of the old type. As far as purely theoretical discussions, many comments have been made over the years that to produce a maximally dangerous weapon, a starting point could be a strain of influenza, for its ease of transmission,vigorousness, and adaptibility, married, through genetic engineering to something like one of the hemorrhagic fevers, such as Ebola. Others have replied that, yup, this would be just dandy if the goal was to destroy all human life on earth. I think that's what you're looking for. Other lines of theory dealt with ideas like disabling but not essentially fatal infections designed to impair the ability of a country to defend itself without actually causing mass deaths. Such as, for instance, a highly infectious and fairly debilitating strain of influenza, which would greatly degrade the ability of an army to get out of bed or stray far from the latrine, which would tend to make fighting a trifle more difficult.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics