Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armor Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Russian T90 vs. US M1A2 Abrams
achtpanz    6/14/2004 3:59:14 AM
Russian T90 vs American M1A2 Abrams - Which is better? If these tanks fought in battle, which would suffer more casualties, which one is superior? What are their advantages? Any information would be helpful.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
ColdStart    George   4/9/2011 6:32:09 PM


no no no... what? what are you talking about? do you know how radar works? (except that it emits waves gets return measures delay etc...) i mean... seriously... you know how it is designed? what are the main parts of receiver are? What are the issues in transmitting different kind of waveforms? Different frequencies? Do you know which processes are going on in different parts of receiver during detection? How does detection transfers into tracking? in other words... WTF are you talking about? you have NO idea how a radar works! No matter which! forget about Russian or US... you have no IDEA how a BASIC radar works! And you try to put a simple example with birds? You say we cant do electronics? Do you know that our imaging radars could do better than image quality pictures even long time ago? Do you know what it means? Do you understand how does the radar resolution is dictated? How to calculate it?

 
You are asking a lot of questions for a person who does not know any of these things himself.

I do know answers to all those questions, and do know much more than that.
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    George   4/9/2011 6:37:57 PM
and about guy who landed on red square - it was fabrication in order to remove many generals and other people from their positions. if it would be Stalin's period, he would just shoot them within few days after designation of enemy of nation. different leaders - different ways of solving inner problems. It has nothing to do with quality of air defence.
 
Only at the beginning USAF was lucky flying in Russia, when its air defense was developing. But even then, after U2 was down, USAF decided not to risk anymore.
 
Its a typical way of settling down someone who goes on strong - after first kick in face, his hot warrior blood gets colder. But now US military is smart enough not to do such things anymore :) And with current Russian air defence, those things not gona work out anyways.
 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo       4/9/2011 8:13:13 PM





no no no... what? what are you talking about? do you know how radar works? (except that it emits waves gets return measures delay etc...) i mean... seriously... you know how it is designed? what are the main parts of receiver are? What are the issues in transmitting different kind of waveforms? Different frequencies? Do you know which processes are going on in different parts of receiver during detection? How does detection transfers into tracking? in other words... WTF are you talking about? you have NO idea how a radar works! No matter which! forget about Russian or US... you have no IDEA how a BASIC radar works! And you try to put a simple example with birds? You say we cant do electronics? Do you know that our imaging radars could do better than image quality pictures even long time ago? Do you know what it means? Do you understand how does the radar resolution is dictated? How to calculate it?



 

You are asking a lot of questions for a person who does not know any of these things himself.





I do know answers to all those questions, and do know much more than that.


Prove it.
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart       4/9/2011 9:25:48 PM
The fact that i pointed out his silly, and rough estimation in such a sophisticated area of electronics as radar already shows that i am aware of its structure and the way how complex this system is. If someone whose knowledge in radars limited to flashlight concepts tries to prove me that B2 cant be detected, then he is dumb.
 
That proves it all, i am not going to write up basic radar structure and fundamentals here and show up as expert, like the Herald did, when i asked him one basic thing, and he posted the whole paragraph which was definitely paraphrased and copied from some online source :) lol
 
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/9/2011 11:23:09 PM

seriously, anyone who thinks that Matthuias Rus was a russian plot does not have a clue.

you are all wasting your time here - he is not interested in technical debate.

move on 
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    ok   4/10/2011 1:35:17 AM
have no idea where to move on with these bestamerica trolls.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust    coldstart   4/10/2011 2:19:07 AM

when you demonstrate some maturity of debate, when you actually stop behaving like a 14yo on youtube, then perhaps people will start to take you seriously.

as soon as you don't understand or can't challenge anyone you trot out the lame responses

"bestamerica" reinforces that you take the cheap road our rather than intellectual engagement.

people have been incredibly patient with you, but you just can't help yourself and revert to form

/igmore on
 
Quote    Reply

earlm       4/10/2011 8:52:22 PM

have no idea where to move on with these bestamerica trolls.

Key Publishing forums.
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    ok   4/10/2011 9:16:41 PM
it is extremely stupid thing to do to try to convince that we are not advanced and you and a guy who claims it are a way more superior to us. thats really lame and dumb thing to do. but it comes from a american schoolboy anyhow, a schoolboy who unlikely will be able to build a simple FM radio, but which knows extremely well that B2s are not detectable and that radar transmits and receives. LOL . so let it go this way :) you are good :)
 
Quote    Reply

earlm       4/10/2011 10:53:19 PM

it is extremely stupid thing to do to try to convince that we are not advanced and you and a guy who claims it are a way more superior to us. thats really lame and dumb thing to do. but it comes from a american schoolboy anyhow, a schoolboy who unlikely will be able to build a simple FM radio, but which knows extremely well that B2s are not detectable and that radar transmits and receives. LOL . so let it go this way :) you are good :)

Look at the whole spectrum of tech and then look at your post.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News 		  Most
 Read 		  Most
 Commented		  Hot
 Topics