Weapons: Bombs Behaving Oddly


August 24, 2011: For the second time in two years, the U.S. Navy has developed a new type of bomb that causes fewer civilian casualties. This one uses HDRM (High-Density Reactive Materials), a composite of metallic and polymer materials that are stable and as strong as steel unless detonated by nearby explosives. Thus when the explosives in the missile, bomb or shell go off, the HDRM shell of the projectile explodes as well. This can increase the explosive effect by up to five times, while reducing the metallic projectiles by over 90 percent. It’s the metallic projectiles (shrapnel) that causes more distant casualties. The only problem with HDRM is it’s just out of the laboratory, costs more than a hundred times as much as the steel it replaces. It will take a decade or more before it becomes a cost-effective replacement for metal casings for these weapons.

Last year, the navy developed a more practical approach. This was a variable explosive bomb (VEB), based on technology demonstrated by weapons manufacturer ATK. Such a bomb can be set to a different amount of explosive force by the pilot, before dropping it. This is important for smart bombs, which can precisely hit a target. But often the targets have civilians nearby, and a smaller explosion will kill the enemy, and avoid civilian casualties.

The ATK demonstration bomb had three different settings, with the lowest creating a blast radius 40 percent less than at full power. This works by having the explosives split up in different compartments inside the bomb. For lower power, some of the explosives are ignited, using a lower power detonator that sets them to burn, like a rocket, rather than exploding. Modern explosives, like C-4, have long been used by troops as fuel, to boil water, by lighting them, rather than using an explosive detonator. Not recommended, but done anyway since before the Vietnam War. ATK has a bomb design that takes advantage of this. The navy gave ATK $10 million, and several years, to produce a workable version of a variable explosive 223 kg (500 pound) bomb.

The U.S. Air Force and Navy have been working on lower "bang" 500 pound bombs for years. The objective was to create a bomb that can be used in urban areas, to destroy a single structure, or just part of a larger one, without injuring nearby civilians and the structures they are in. Another development in this area has been the FLM (Focused Lethality Munition) bomb, which uses a composite (carbon fiber) casing and replaces some of the normal 127.2 kg (280 pounds) of explosives with 93 kg of explosives surrounded by high density filler (fine tungsten powder). A regular 500 pound bomb has a blast radius (injury from blast pressure) out to 13 meters, with dangerous fragments lethal out to 40 meters. The FAM would cut these distances by at least half. Meanwhile, the filler makes the bomb deadlier within the smaller blast radius. FAM, of course, is GPS or laser guided.

Four years ago, the U.S. Navy began using the LCDB (Low Collateral Damage Bomb) in Iraq. This is basically a 500 pound JDAM (GPS guided smart bomb) with 89 percent of the explosives removed, and replaced with non-explosive material (so the bomb's flight characteristics remain the same.) The remaining 13.6 kg (30 pounds) of explosives give the bomb a much smaller bang, and less chance of nearby civilians getting hurt. As a result, the LCDB has a bang that is closer to that of a 155mm artillery shell. What's interesting about that was the U.S. Army was  also using GPS guided Excalibur 155mm "smart shells" in Iraq at the time. But Excalibur cost twice as much as an LCDB. So does the new air force SBD (121 kg/265 pound Small Diameter Bomb). Thus the demand for a cheaper, variable explosive 500 pound bomb.

The concept of the HDRM, VEB, FAM and LCDB is not new. During the 1990s, the U.S. Air Force replaced all the 189 kg (416 pounds) of explosives with concrete in thousand pound laser guided bombs used against Iraqi anti-aircraft guns and missiles. This was because Saddam ordered his anti-aircraft weapons placed inside densely packed residential areas, in the hope that any American or British aircraft responding to fire from his anti-aircraft weapons, would also kill lots of civilians. That would make for a great photo op, as Saddam was trying to turn himself into a victim of American and British aggression. Dead civilians helped a lot. Concrete smart bombs took out the anti-aircraft weapons, but rarely hurt any nearby civilians.




beggar Help Keep Us Online!

Yep, we have been forced to beg for your support. We want our readers to have a good experience while they are here. We avoid video ads and populating the pages with more than three ads unlike other sites, but this has a consequence for us -- lower revenues. We are bringing in a third of the revenue we brought in just a few years ago. We are not quite homeless yet, but we need your support to keep going. There are three ways you can help:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..

Drake appreciates any help you can give him.

Subscribe   Contribute   Close