|
|
The War On Terror: Tactics
| Click here to send the text of this page to a friend. | Click here to return to the The War On Terror index/archive. |
Getting Afghans to Talk Without Torture
by James Dunnigan April 16, 2005
Discussion Board on this DLS topic
In Afghanistan, when you fight terrorists, you often do it by local rules.
Case in point is how you get local villagers to identify who has been firing
rockets at Bagram air base. This huge base is the main support facility for NATO
forces in Afghanistan. Every few months, a local Afghan, or group of them,
decide, for a variety of reasons, to fire rockets (usually the 42 pound 107mm
Russian BM-12) at the base. These rockets are not very accurate when fired from
an improvised launcher. While they often land within the base, they rarely hit
anything of value. The local Afghans ignore it, as there are so many other
natural, and man made things around that can kill them. A couple of Afghans on
jihad, or just angry at the “foreigners,” firing rockets at Bagram can be
ignored. Besides, identifying the rocket boys to the foreigners can start a
family feud. That can get dangerous.
American commanders have learned that there are ways to get the locals to
talk, and identify the people firing the rocket. The most useful method is to
halt reconstruction projects, or shut down the weekly bazaar (where local
Afghans can sell goods to the thousands of troops and civilians on the base).
Either of these moves costs the local Afghan economy thousands of dollars a
week. In a country where $20 a month is a good salary, that kind of loss is
felt. It may take weeks, or even months, before the local elders get together
and decide that it’s better for all concerned that the guilty guy be turned in.
Afghans often settle disputes in terms of money. That’s an ancient tradition
that survives in the West in the form of fines levied by judges. For the
Afghans, the identity of a guilty Afghan is worth only so much in economic
losses. So far, several rocket firing incidents have been cleared up this way.
Not just in Bagram, but in other parts of Afghanistan as well. Sometimes, Civil
Affairs or Special Forces officers, who have established good relations with the
locals, can just go to the elders, or local strongman, and ask for the rocket
firing, or sniping, or planting of mines, to stop. Usually, the perpetrator is
known to many of the locals. Such a request often gets the attacks to stop, even
though the guy responsible does not get turned in. If local attacks have killed
or injured American troops, the negotiations are a bit more intense. The Afghans
recognize the concept of “blood feud” and can understand that angry American
soldiers, eager to get revenge, might be something to avoid. Sometimes the
guilty party is identified, and it is left to the American troops to do the
rest. Other times, it turns out that one of the local men has suddenly left the
area. And the locals don’t expect to see him return until the local American
troops finish their tour of duty.
American Special Forces have long
trained to handle “counter-terrorism” events using these methods. Regular
American troops have learned to work closely with any Special Forces operating
in the area. Most Special Forces A teams have one or more members who speak the
local language, and can get needed negotiations going. Since late 2001, the U.S.
Army has prepared more training materials for incoming American troops,
explaining how the local politics, and “law enforcement” works. All this has
gone a long way towards keeping the American casualties down in
Afghanistan.
|
 See Jim Dunnigan's interviewed about his latest book The Perfect Soldier on ireadnet.com
 The Perfect Soldier: Special Operations, Commandos, and the Future of Us Warfare by James F. Dunnigan
More Books by James Dunnigan |