The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United Nations Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: UN SUCKS
UN SUCKS    11/30/2001 5:41:28 PM
UN SUCKS
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted
viotwtw wtwtw rtwrwwfwefefefef    RE:UN SUCKS   2/25/2002 6:04:22 PM
duh
 
Quote    Reply

SiloDefender45@aol.com    RE:UN SUCKS   8/18/2002 7:02:44 PM
UN has done nothing for the US!!!
 
Quote    Reply

gary    RE:UN SUCKS   8/22/2002 11:48:10 AM
get us out now. this world goverment .
 
Quote    Reply

Spetsnaz    RE:UN SUCKS   10/24/2002 10:56:49 PM
CHEERS TO THAT
 
Quote    Reply

Spiku    RE:UN SUCKS   1/30/2003 5:11:50 AM
My problem is that they're too biased in our favor. of course, this is a perk of being the world's foremost superpower, but really. For the same reasons why monoploies arte bad in business, the same holds true for international diplomacy. The sooner China rises to superpower status and Russia rebuilds, the better.
 
Quote    Reply

jerim    RE:UN SUCKS   4/8/2003 12:07:48 PM
So you want China to become a would power? Do you know what China does for a living? Forced abortions, and human rights violations, that is what China is all about. You hate your freedom so much, that you actually wish to take it from others? Why not just wish for Hitler to come back and slaughter more Jews?
 
Quote    Reply

WinsettZ    RE:UN SUCKS   8/1/2003 8:23:22 PM
The US has probably done worse in its history, checked only by the media. Once Chinese news networks get a real bite and some autonomy from the government, then China will have to cut back on its...deviations. China has to hang on to MFN trading status. It wouldn't do for Americans to boycott (or try to boycott) chinese products and cause a ruckus.
 
Quote    Reply

tomanbeg    RE:UN SUCKS   9/2/2003 9:33:14 AM
Not gonna happen anytime soon. America is just hitting it's stride. The USA will be more powerful in 30 years then it is now, both relative to itself and other nations. Only the USA, Japan, Israel and Europe can build Megawatt LASERs. Europe cannot afford it and Japan and Israel are to small. Weapons Grade LASERs are the biggest change to military Power since the invention of Gunpowder. The only true RMA going right now. Advances in C&C are evolutionary not revolutionary. Russia and China are waving bye-bye at the boat. T.
 
Quote    Reply

tomanbeg    RE:UN SUCKS   9/2/2003 9:35:53 AM
Im a believer in the Olympics as a secret weapon. It worked on Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, why not China? T.
 
Quote    Reply

PuckaMan    RE:UN SUCKS   11/26/2003 6:22:46 PM
Why are all these people against the UN? The USA helped create it! It effectively does what the USA wants anyway, and let us not forget that the USA has NOT signed international treaties like the Rights of the Child and No Land Mines - other countries who haven't signed are of the ilk of Burma, China and other flagrant abusers of humanity. In the case of Iraq, the UN has been doing what it is supposed to do - being a stopgap on unilateralism and an international forum. There'd be a lot more problems without it. Saddam is gone. Fantastic, that bastard should have gone ages ago, and it should have been done under the UN. However, it has been admitted by US officials high in the CIA and other powerful bodies that the Oil Lobby effectively controls US policy, and to quote "...the USA has made some really bad, stupid, unethical decisions like originally supporting Saddam and supporting the Saudi government when it is directly funding Al-Queda, all in the name of Oil." I like America, I have lived there. It has done great things for the World, and is capable of World Leadership. This current spat of Unilateralism and Primitive Patriotism does it and its citizens a great disservice.
 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan    RE:UN SUCKS   1/19/2004 5:59:19 AM
"ultra patriotism" also robs the US of chances to guide the UN instead of fight with it. We need to be mindful of other countries with rising status undermining us in the institution that we created. Many of the bickering is over ultra-right wing issues like abortion anyway. This is just my opinion, but every time we refuse to sign international conventions it is because they are 1. a threat to US based MNCs 2. contrary to religious beliefs (such as funding for family planning in 3rd world countries. When the US can move past this kind of ilk and take back the position it once had in the world we can truly call ourselves "world leaders" again.
 
Quote    Reply

Vulture    Let me guess Nanheyangrouchuan    1/19/2004 9:20:40 AM
You support the Kyoto Protocol as a fair treaty? Yes it does fall under your #1, but if support those exemptions you're no friend of the US. Or how about the proposal to give the UN control of the Internet? Or maybe the one that said that US citizens would lose the right to own firearms? Nanheyangrouchuan , the UN is not a democracy and as such should not be given power over democracies.
 
Quote    Reply

decipherzu    RE:Let me guess Nanheyangrouchuan    12/2/2004 2:20:24 PM
The U.N. is a joke. Ten Days before 9/11 they hold a conference in Durban, south africa. The ostensible purpose of the U.N. World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and related Intolerance , was to combat intolerance, but it seems it's real agenda was to orchestrate an international assualt on the democracies of the west, more specificly united sates, Britain and Israel. These three nations and them alone were condemmned in speeches and resolutions for their alleged racism, historical involvment in slavery and colonialism. Despite the fact that America and Britain had led the world in combating racism by introducing the idea of racial equality as a basic human right two hundred years earlier and by taking the lead in ending slavery, an instutition that had been universally accepted for three thousand years. Not only was slavery still practiced by muslim regimes in africa ( Which went unmentioned at teh U.N. conference)) but the largest ethnic genocide since WWII had occured in rwanda ten years earlier and was niethera legacey of coloialism nor slavery but a tribal affair. The U.N. itsself had ignored the Rwandans' appeals for intervention to prevent genocide, that could have avoided the slaughter of one million Africans. To be Continued.......
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy