Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Across the board GOP wins on November 3 would merely be more evidence of the GOP's continuing slide
Zhang Fei    11/2/2009 9:56:28 PM
Saith... the AP:
WASHINGTON ? For Republicans, an election win of any size Tuesday would be a blessing. But victories in Virginia, New Jersey or elsewhere won't erase enormous obstacles the party faces heading into a 2010 midterm election year when control of Congress and statehouses from coast to coast will be up for grabs. It's been a tough few years for the GOP. The party lost control of Congress in 2006 and then lost the White House in 2008 with three traditional Republican states ? Indiana, North Carolina and Virginia ? abandoning the party. So even if political winds start blowing harder behind them and even if they can capitalize on Democratic missteps, Republicans still will have a long way to go over the next year because of their party's own fundamental problems ? divisions over the path forward, the lack of anational leader and a shrinking base in a changing nation. The GOP would overcome none of those hurdles should Republican Bob McDonnell win the Virginia governor's race, Chris Christie emerge victorious in the New Jersey governor's contest, or conservative Doug Hoffman triumph in a hotly contested special congressional election in upstate New York.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2
Nanheyangrouchuan       11/3/2009 12:59:44 AM
If you win, you lose.  If you lose, you lose.
 
 
Chumps.
 
Quote    Reply

buzzard       11/3/2009 8:53:21 AM
Wow, the leftie press is already covering for the Dems before they even lose. Pre-emptive excuses is a whole new angle.
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       11/3/2009 2:59:57 PM
Defeat is victory! War is peace!  Liberals are conserv...well, let's not go crazy here.
 
Somewhere FDR and JFK are shaking their heads over what crybabies the Democrats have become.
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       11/3/2009 11:10:47 PM
Well, well.  Looks like the GOP wins in Virginia and New Jersey for sure, with NY-23 still close.
 
I suppose this "means nothing."
 
Quote    Reply

Zhang Fei       11/3/2009 11:41:58 PM
Here's an interesting comment from MSNBC.com:
A Hoffman win could force Republicans in Washington to pay closer attention to their votes and positions on issues, rather than counting on the Republican label to get them elected.
Actually, win or lose, Republican voters knocked off Scozzafava. Unless Republicans in Washington want to start running as Democrats or independents, they had better start paying attention to the wishes of Republican voters.
 
Quote    Reply

Zhang Fei       11/3/2009 11:53:25 PM
An interesting aspect of the Hoffman defeat in New York is that the Republican party spent almost $1m slamming him until the closing 3 days of the election. If unelected GOP leaders like Michael Steele continue to spend money siding with Democrats against Republicans, one of two things will happen - they will be removed from office by elected GOP leaders, or Republican voters will unseat the GOP legislators who picked people like Steele.
 
Quote    Reply

buzzard       11/4/2009 7:15:04 AM
It's amusing that the nimrods who call me all the time from the GOP wonder why I don't give them money. I cite instances like the election in NY23 and the backing of other completely useless individuals, but they don't get it.
 
Quote    Reply

Zhang Fei       11/4/2009 6:16:13 PM
The interesting thing is that Ogabe did not campaign for NY-23. The Democrat won. Ogabe campaigned for both the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial elections. Both Democratic candidates lost. Now, the national polls say Ogabe isn't yet underwater (i.e. unfavorables > favorables). The question is whether, subconsciously, voters are starting to turn on the Ogabe brand, regardless of what they say to pollsters.
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       11/4/2009 8:49:16 PM
Actually, Zhang, Obama and Biden did campaign for Owens in NY-23--Axelrod was boasting about "beating Palin" today, though as I recall, her name wasn't on the ballot in NY-23; she merely endorsed Hoffman.
 
Gives me a clue where this administration's priorities are.  The Dems just lost Virginia's governorship, which was probably going to happen, and New Jersey, which wasn't supposed to.  Owens is a Blue Dog Democrat, not a far left Dem, and he may not be as ready to vote the party line on health care and cap/trade.  Independents seem to be deserting Obama in droves.  But hey, none of that matters, so long as they "get Palin."
 
For someone who wields about as much influence as Glenn Beck, Obama's boys sure are afraid of her. 
 
Quote    Reply

Zhang Fei       11/4/2009 10:13:59 PM
For someone who wields about as much influence as Glenn Beck, Obama's boys sure are afraid of her. 
 
I don't think they're afraid of her - they think she's a laughingstock and hope - along with the media (Fox excepted) - to convince the rest of the nation that she's a laughingstock. I think they have had some success painting her this way. Whether she's the Republican nominee in 2012 will depend on her success in counter-acting the media blitz against her. The media doesn't always win - it trashed Reagan for 8 years and succeeded mainly in opening America's eyes to the way the media is dominated by left-wing ideologues. The American electorate may have to relearn the lessons of the Reagan years. If Palin can make her case effectively, all the calumny against her will have the same effect on her that it had on Reagan - none at all.
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy