Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The Mutiny in the GOP
PPR    11/2/2009 8:07:48 AM
There's a battle going for the soul of the GOP. Moderates control the party. They will call themselves conservatives during an election year. Once elected, they abandon that conservative language and start using phrases like "compromise", "progressive", and "moderation." Instead of tax cut, defense increases, balanced budgets, and family values; they got prescription drugs, gay marriage, "war on the cheap", massive spending increases, massive deficits, and "no child left behind." All this came from GOP leaders in Washington. Those leaders hoped to expand the party by appealing to moderates and liberals. What they failed to understand was that by moving the party left, they were moving away from their center of mass. Rather than expand the party, they are now has a much smaller party and are "wandering in wilderness." Those GOP leaders should have instead promoted the conservative values of their party to moderates (as Reagan and BO did). We are now seeing a mutiny by conservatives. "http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/scozzfava_hoffman_gop/2009/11/01/280110.html" In a NY special election, a moderate and conservative candidate were both running. GOP members from across the nations funneled money to the conservative. The "moderate", for lack of funds, dropped out of the race and threw her support to the democrat. There could not be a more clear example of why the party base is so reluctant to support these "moderate" Republicans. The GOP is going to have to offer real conservative candidates if it hopes to ever again appeal to their base (which is 40% of votes currently).
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3
sentinel28a       11/3/2009 3:35:45 PM
Yelli, there's no reason to delve into irrationality just because Nan has made it his forte. 
It's not the government's business one way or another if a woman wants to marry a cow.  (Actually, it would more properly be a bull.  She's not going to get too much beastiality action from a cow.  And I'm sorry I brought this semantic point up now.)  Let her marry the poor thing and provide the internet with a new meme.  I don't care.
 
Porn on primetime TV?  I think that would be a dumb move, since most Americans (including liberals) wouldn't stand for it, and a show based entirely around T&A loses its appeal after about the third episode.  NYPD Blue used it as a gimmick, then became a pretty decent cop show when the gimmick stopped working.  If you want to see boobs on primetime TV, watch cable.  If you're a parent, have the brains enough to turn the TV off or stick in Ice Age when the kids are awake.  You can watch all the hardcore porn you want after they go to bed. 
 
(Just watch out for the kids sneaking out of their rooms.  I did that while my dad was watching Heavy Metal.  Being eight, I didn't get what the deal was between the naked woman and the robot, and I screamed when the zombies attacked the B-17.  Took me 15 years to get over that...)
 
And while I would very much like to watch Prussian Blue (the aforementioned white supremacist girl group) get dropped off on Chicago's South Side or forced to attend a IDF veterans' reunion, the Constitution does protect their right to be heard.  Thankfully, it also protects our right to shut them off, or for radio stations to refuse to play their crap.
 
I hope Nan doesn't read this post...I'd hate to see his head explode over a blood-drinker conservative like myself defending free speech. 
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy