Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The Mutiny in the GOP
PPR    11/2/2009 8:07:48 AM
There's a battle going for the soul of the GOP. Moderates control the party. They will call themselves conservatives during an election year. Once elected, they abandon that conservative language and start using phrases like "compromise", "progressive", and "moderation." Instead of tax cut, defense increases, balanced budgets, and family values; they got prescription drugs, gay marriage, "war on the cheap", massive spending increases, massive deficits, and "no child left behind." All this came from GOP leaders in Washington. Those leaders hoped to expand the party by appealing to moderates and liberals. What they failed to understand was that by moving the party left, they were moving away from their center of mass. Rather than expand the party, they are now has a much smaller party and are "wandering in wilderness." Those GOP leaders should have instead promoted the conservative values of their party to moderates (as Reagan and BO did). We are now seeing a mutiny by conservatives. "http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/scozzfava_hoffman_gop/2009/11/01/280110.html" In a NY special election, a moderate and conservative candidate were both running. GOP members from across the nations funneled money to the conservative. The "moderate", for lack of funds, dropped out of the race and threw her support to the democrat. There could not be a more clear example of why the party base is so reluctant to support these "moderate" Republicans. The GOP is going to have to offer real conservative candidates if it hopes to ever again appeal to their base (which is 40% of votes currently).
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3   NEXT
sentinel28a       11/2/2009 3:44:59 PM
Nan, I admit my subscription to Evil Conservative Monthly has lapsed recently, but I'm trying to think of conservatives who do any of that.
 
If it had only been conservatives who blocked Prop 8 in California, it would've passed easily.  It was rejected.  Hmm.  Could there be liberals who are against gay marriage?  Naw.  Liberals are Lawful Good, whereas conservatives are Lawful Evil.  (Libertarians are Chaotic Evil.)  Why are there gay conservatives? 

Remember the halcyon days when the Republicans controlled Congress and the White House?  Gay marriage was banned completely then, wasn't it?  The Constitutional amendment was passed, right?  Oh wait...it wasn't.  Amazingly, despite eight years of Bush wiping his butt with the Constitution, gays were not burned as heretics nor were they thrown into reeducation camps. 
 
Conservatives telling people what they can't watch or read?  Let's see...who's behind the Fairness Doctrine again?  And of course we all remember Bush's press secretary telling people not to watch CBS News because they're not a "real news source" or claimed that Air America was the real face of the Democrat Party.
 
Music we can listen to?  Wow, I'm so glad we banned rap and rock 'n' roll!  Oh, wait...we didn't?  Damn!
 
Would you like some tinfoil, Nan?  A hug? We conservatives don't carry cooties, you know.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       11/2/2009 4:07:12 PM

Americans had the best deal of all the people in the world and now they are pissing it all away. And for what?

For some utopian free market ideal that will never work. For that you will abandon/dismantle any form of responsible government, which is what gave you the best deal in the first place. And instead of getting involved and fixing what's broken, abandon that in favor of none or almost no government that has already failed when tried on a limited scale?.
 
This is like talking a drug addict out of heroin.

You know what. You have a front side seat, it's your society.
 

Your attack on private property ownership and distortion-free trading environment is laughable and shallow. Every time you came up with real world example on how free market doesn't work, you got rebuked, debunked and refuted out right. In the end, the only way you can claim your disillusion that government involvement can bring justice to the market, is writing down simple sentence to deny free market. Whom do you think we are? 5th grade students who can't spell anarchism? The fact is that you can't even name what's broken, needless to say difference within libertarian movement. At least Libertarians have a theory and they are damn right about what's going on in the market most of the time. You want proof? I give you two words first: Peter Schiff. There's more to come if you keep living in your illusion of government intervention.
 
Quote    Reply

buzzard       11/2/2009 4:09:08 PM
Of course the blather about 'telling people who they can marry' is utterly ridiculous on the face of the fact that most states already have civil unions statutes. While there exist some thumpers who object to those laws, most conservatives don't. Even in the face of a comprehensive civil union rule in California, their court overturned a law about marriage being man+woman, over the will of the electorate (a previous referendum), which is why Proposition 8 had to be run. Marriage is a traditional institution defined by history. The fact that gays can't be satisfied with a legal construct of equal effect (civil unions), but have to intrude into the traditional institution says a lot about their goals. It's not about the marriage for the gays, it's about forcing acceptance and breaking down traditional institutions.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       11/2/2009 7:11:29 PM
I wonder whether Nan thinks people should be allowed to marry a cow, watching pornography broadcast via air on prime time, and listen to white supremacist heavy metal on FM radio.
 
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       11/2/2009 8:03:44 PM
I just realized that Nanhe and FJV are the BW and FS of American political threads:  They seem to find any excuse to try to insert some crap about "social conservatism" in the case of Nanhe, and "libertarianism and free markets" (by which I think he means the conservative *and* libertarian emphasis on personal responsibility) in the case of FJV.
 
As usual, everything buzzard and yelli said above is right on target, especially about both of them repeatedly demonstrating their cluelessness regarding American politics and the American Right.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

PPR    The Big Prize   11/2/2009 9:38:07 PM
Right now, self-proclaimed conservatives constitute 40% of voters, the largest idealogical demographic in the country.  Compare this to the liberals that dominate the House, Senate, and White House, who at 21% make up the smallest idealogical demographic.
 
 
This survey was conducted by Gallup and covered 40,000 interviews--a gold-standard for crediblity.
 
BO understood this and appealed to the right when he ran for president, promising a tax cut and reduced waste and deficits.
 
If a candidate can deliver those 40% who call themselves conservative and only half of the 35% who call themselves moderates, you have a landslide with 57% of the vote.  So how does a liberal get elected? Be liberal in the primary to get your core, then pretend to be a conservative in the general elections (which was what BO did).
 
But the problem with voting for a faux conservative is that people do remember what you did when the election was done. So when John McCain appealed for conservative voters, they recalled all the times he crossed party lines to vote for "moderate" legislation.  Natually, a number of those voters were reluctant to vote for him.
 
So when BO stands for re-election, he'll be facing voters that will remember he promised to eliminate earmarks and cut taxes for 95% of Americans.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan       11/2/2009 9:58:32 PM

I wonder whether Nan thinks people should be allowed to marry a cow, watching pornography broadcast via air on prime time, and listen to white supremacist heavy metal on FM radio.

 


well, the Constitution doesn't cover animals, so beastiality is out.  But a little prime time porn would take the edge off the day and white supremacist heavy metal on a FM radio channel would be covered by the first amendment.
 
And I fully agree that Yelli and FJV don't know dick about US politics outside the confines of their ultra right wing compound.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       11/2/2009 11:39:05 PM


well, the Constitution doesn't cover animals, so beastiality is out.  But a little prime time porn would take the edge off the day and white supremacist heavy metal on a FM radio channel would be covered by the first amendment.
 
And I fully agree that Yelli and FJV don't know dick about US politics outside the confines of their ultra right wing compound.

 
 
The reason that man can't marry a cow is that man can't make a contract with a cow. The Constitution doesn't mention anything about marriage. At that time, they thought marriage is so trivial that it can't be anything but a man and a woman. The Constitution also doesn't mention about animal rights and cruelty against animal. Should we continue on this subject? You got the result right, but the reason is all wrong.
 
Blatant, detestable display of sexuality is called obscenity. It is both agitative and inappropriate. You'd better know how to explain to your children why a woman is hog tied while doubly penetrated during prime time TV.
 
I guess you are so American that you don't know what happened in Rwanda 15 years ago. 
 
Quote    Reply

buzzard       11/3/2009 8:42:20 AM
Hey Nan, how about a man marrying his sister? Mother? Daughter? Those should all be perfectly kosher in your world right?
 
Quote    Reply

boeheim    From the local paper.   11/3/2009 1:10:11 PM
 
"Despite the national media attention on Northern New York right now, we should all remember that the 23rd Congressional District has no great significance. And neither did Gettysburg. It's just the place where the great armies met."
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy