Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: FYI- did u know 28 Americans die daily due to gun violence
Necromancer    3/31/2009 2:41:30 AM
Gun control overdue!!!
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26   NEXT
Aussiegunneragain    Rocky   4/26/2009 10:42:25 PM

Try to view the data and not seek ways to justify your opinion.

 
 
What, you mean like noting that despite your argument that gun controls increase violent crime during the 2003 round of gun controls in Australia murders went down? LOL!!!
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    Rocky   4/26/2009 10:47:54 PM


Now I don't expect you to try and actually rebut anything I've said since I've seen your par on this so far, and it usually involves obfuscation and dodging because you don't have a valid case to make. The facts simply don't bear it out. Prove my Hawaii case first, and then maybe you will have some vestige of a point.
 
Dunno enough about the Hawaiian case to comment beyond noting that all catagories of violent crime apart from aggrevated assault have been going down there for about 20 years. In New York  all of them including aggrevated assault have been going down for at least 15. See link.

 
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    Buzzard   4/26/2009 10:49:43 PM





Now I don't expect you to try and actually rebut anything I've said since I've seen your par on this so far, and it usually involves obfuscation and dodging because you don't have a valid case to make. The facts simply don't bear it out. Prove my Hawaii case first, and then maybe you will have some vestige of a point.



 

Dunno enough about the Hawaiian case to comment beyond noting that all catagories of violent crime apart from aggrevated assault have been going down there for about 20 years. In New York  all of them including aggrevated assault have been going down for at least 15. See link.


Damn software keeps putting other peoples names in my posts. Anyway, for the answer to the rest of your post see my response to warpig.
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    Warpig   4/26/2009 10:51:04 PM









This means that they can be stopped at that source or in transit from it by appropriate and well-enforced regulation. The article that I posted suggests that registration of firearms is effective in reducing firearms ownership by criminals, but if you have a better idea then by all means feel free to share it. I'd note that just saying existing laws will do clearly doesn't cut it though because crooks don't seem to have any trouble getting guns in the US at the moment.












Agreed:  Appropriate and well-enforced legislation.  Exactly what all the many tens of millions of pro-gun Americans want.  No, it does not suggest that to me, instead it suggests that those criminals hampered by it instead turned to other means to obtain their firearms anyway in spite of it.  Yes, my better idea(s) has/have already been shared, as well as my reasons why the ideas you mentioned are not better ideas, and are shared by those same tens of millions of Americans I mentioned above.  Existing laws (when enforced) certainly can cut it just as well as your proposed new ones (when enforced), and with the added benefit of being less undesirably intrusive into the lives of 99% of gun owners who have not and never will commit a crime with their guns, as well as the 100% of Americans who will have their whole Constitutional system and heritage further eroded by them.  This issue is not merely about crime statistics, even though they are sufficiently on the side of liberalizing gun ownership, because murder rates by instrument used are not the only thing that is important in life.  If it was, then as has been pointed out before, all sorts of objects would "need" to be banned. 






The problem with your argument is that while it might be illegal to sell a weapon to a convicted felon, a minor or somebody with a mental illness and while that will probably stop gun owners from doing so, without registration and tracking of the weapon there is nothing stopping somebody without a record buying one and onselling it to crooks. I suspect that this is why the study that I provided shows the result that it did.

 

Sure, registraton and tracking make purchasing a gun a bit more onerous and expensive but based on our experience not prohibitively so for honest citizens. People in the US are generally reasonably well off so I doubt that having to spend a bit to get a gun registered is going to prevent somebody who really wants one for self defence or sporting purposes from getting one, especially with the number of cheap second-hand ones floating around. I don't know why you wouldn't want to do this, it isn't going to stop you keeping a gun and it might weight the odds for you against a criminal who can now only own a knife.

 

I would also note that in DC versus Heller the Supreme Court clearly articulated that you have a right to bear arms in self defence, that this is not unlimited and that Governments have the right to regulate gun ownership. As such you can't argue that licencing and registration is an erosion of your Constitutional rights. In any case I think the whole "erosion of rights" argument is eronenous as I am sure that there are plenty of people in the US who believe that people should be able to own guns but that reasonable restrictions should be enforced. They aren't going to let the gun control zealots take them away completely. I know that if further restrictions were imposed here I would oppose them because I think that the current ones are adequate for our purposes.



Should read "while that will probably stop gun shop owners from doing so".
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       4/26/2009 11:32:29 PM

Yes,  what they typically do is expand the definition of 'children' to include 18 year old and below. Thus you capture the statistics for the majority of gang bangers who are a huge chunk of the firearm related deaths in this country as they fight over drug dealing turf. This is simply deceptive and dishonest. Hell, they could include death rates for 18 old soldiers as well if they really wanted to inflate things I suppose and it would be equally honest.




Yeah screw them, they aren't real children whose deaths we care about because they aren't nice white, middle class all American kids. Never mind that many of them have never met their fathers, that their mothers are crack whores and that they have never had any example set beyond that which the gangs provide. That makes no difference because we are libertarian's and we just "got it" when it comes to how to live a wholesome life. Our environment and upbringing had nothing to do with it  so we don't even need to be grateful that we grew up under decent circumstances.

 

Since these nigger and spic kids are so useless we'll just keep letting them have cheap guns to kill each other off because we don't really give a shit about them. We definately don't care enough to consider measures which might make it harder for them to get guns in the first place. That might make it a little bit harder and expensive for for us to get a guns too and God Dammit, we might only have enough money left over to get a 50 inch plasma TV rather than that 63 inch one that we really wanted or God forbid we might only be able to afford a 6 cylinder vehicle rather than 8!  We can't have good folk sitting their fat arses in front of a substandard telly or in an under-powered pussymobile that for the sake of a 16 year old "Gangbanger's" life now can we!

 



 



As far as I'm concerned, you just called Buzzard, myself (since I'm in complete agreement with his posts), and everyone else who agrees with him, the lowest sort of racists whose only concern in the whole gun control debate is selfish personal comfort with total disregard for (non-white) human life.  About the best sort of "excuse" I can think of for that post is that you were drunk.  F U C K  You.
 
If I were SYSOPS, you would have just earned a banning.  As it is, you've just demonstrated you are a waste of time, and I'm done with your puke-for-arguments.
 
As Herald might say, "You are dismissed."
 
 
Quote    Reply

EvilFishy       4/26/2009 11:34:28 PM

Aussie, can you tell me why a licensed professional who has gone his entire life with out anything more sever than a moving traffic violation who has no history of violence or criminal activity, who has had his background fully cavity searched by both Federal and State agencies, who does not and has not intention of breaking the law with a fire arm, should not be allowed to posses a firearm?

I mean, I own firearms. WHAT REASONS do you have for the government walking into MY home and depriving me of MY PROPERTY that I paid for?

Please answer me that.

And when you list your answers, leave off the ---somebody might steal my weaponry and kill/injur-- somebody else argument; it would be easier for a criminal to steal my car than my firearms and you are not seriously suggesting I be deprived of my car.

 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain       4/27/2009 6:04:05 AM




Yes,  what they typically do is expand the definition of 'children' to include 18 year old and below. Thus you capture the statistics for the majority of gang bangers who are a huge chunk of the firearm related deaths in this country as they fight over drug dealing turf. This is simply deceptive and dishonest. Hell, they could include death rates for 18 old soldiers as well if they really wanted to inflate things I suppose and it would be equally honest.

Yeah screw them, they aren't real children whose deaths we care about because they aren't nice white, middle class all American kids. Never mind that many of them have never met their fathers, that their mothers are crack whores and that they have never had any example set beyond that which the gangs provide. That makes no difference because we are libertarian's and we just "got it" when it comes to how to live a wholesome life. Our environment and upbringing had nothing to do with it  so we don't even need to be grateful that we grew up under decent circumstances.
Since these nigger and spic kids are so useless we'll just keep letting them have cheap guns to kill each other off because we don't really give a shit about them. We definately don't care enough to consider measures which might make it harder for them to get guns in the first place. That might make it a little bit harder and expensive for for us to get a guns too and God Dammit, we might only have enough money left over to get a 50 inch plasma TV rather than that 63 inch one that we really wanted or God forbid we might only be able to afford a 6 cylinder vehicle rather than 8!  We can't have good folk sitting their fat arses in front of a substandard telly or in an under-powered pussymobile that for the sake of a 16 year old "Gangbanger's" life now can we! 



As far as I'm concerned, you just called Buzzard, myself (since I'm in complete agreement with his posts), and everyone else who agrees with him, the lowest sort of racists whose only concern in the whole gun control debate is selfish personal comfort with total disregard for (non-white) human life.  About the best sort of "excuse" I can think of for that post is that you were drunk.  F U C K  You.

 If I were SYSOPS, you would have just earned a banning.  As it is, you've just demonstrated you are a waste of time, and I'm done with your puke-for-arguments.

As Herald might say, "You are dismissed."

Well if you agree with him then right back at you because I find those views disgusting. Upon what basis can you justify wanting to exclude minors from gun homocide statistics because they are "gangbangers"? Kids don't end up in those situations unless their environment has led them to it. To suggest that it is ok for them to have easy access to means to help them DIE before they have had the chance to sort themselves out as adults, is an absolute disgrace. You and Buzzard should be ashamed of yourselves.
And don't tell me that a fair number of gun supporters are less worried about these deaths because of the dominant colours of these "gangbangers". I've known enough rednecks in my time to know how their political views share. Then again perhaps I have unfairly stereotyped you and Buzzard and you wouldn't even give a sh1t about the deaths of the "gangbanger" kids if more of them were white. If that is the case I will edit your own words to reflect what I think of you.
 
"As far as I'm concerned,  Buzzard and you (since I'm in complete agreement with his posts), and everyone else who agrees with him, the lowest sort of racists most immature sort of morons whose only concern in the whole gun control debate is selfish personal comfort with total disregard for (non-white) vulnerable human life.  About the best sort of "excuse" I can think of for that post is that your parents didn't buy you boys enough toy's when you were kidswere drunk. "

 
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    EF   4/27/2009 6:08:13 AM


Aussie, can you tell me why a licensed professional who has gone his entire life with out anything more sever than a moving traffic violation who has no history of violence or criminal activity, who has had his background fully cavity searched by both Federal and State agencies, who does not and has not intention of breaking the law with a fire arm, should not be allowed to posses a firearm?

I mean, I own firearms. WHAT REASONS do you have for the government walking into MY home and depriving me of MY PROPERTY that I paid for?

Please answer me that.

And when you list your answers, leave off the ---somebody might steal my weaponry and kill/injur-- somebody else argument; it would be easier for a criminal to steal my car than my firearms and you are not seriously suggesting I be deprived of my car.


If you are licensed, the gun is registered and it isn't the type of weapon that you can slaughter a whole bunch of people with if you ever blow a fuze then I don't support the Government being able to do that.  By all means buy a .38 special and feel safe as far as I'm concerned, they look better than your semi-auto anyway.
 
Quote    Reply

buzzard       4/27/2009 9:01:15 AM
Yeah screw them, they aren't real children whose deaths we care about because they aren't nice white, middle class all American kids. Never mind that many of them have never met their fathers, that their mothers are crack whores and that they have never had any example set beyond that which the gangs provide. That makes no difference because we are libertarian's and we just "got it" when it comes to how to live a wholesome life. Our environment and upbringing had nothing to do with it  so we don't even need to be grateful that we grew up under decent circumstances.
 
Since these nigger and spic kids are so useless we'll just keep letting them have cheap guns to kill each other off because we don't really give a shit about them. We definately don't care enough to consider measures which might make it harder for them to get guns in the first place. That might make it a little bit harder and expensive for for us to get a guns too and God Dammit, we might only have enough money left over to get a 50 inch plasma TV rather than that 63 inch one that we really wanted or God forbid we might only be able to afford a 6 cylinder vehicle rather than 8!  We can't have good folk sitting their fat arses in front of a substandard telly or in an under-powered pussymobile that for the sake of a 16 year old "Gangbanger's" life now can we!
 
 I honestly expect better from you, but I guess I now know better. If you didn't get the point of my argument, that is your fault. It was clear enough. Considering 18 year olds 'minors' is crap, and trying to tar me with a racist label because your side uses crap emotional arguments and I dare to refute them is the lowest form of rubbish. An 18 year old can join the army and vote. They are not minors you loon.
 
I am going to report the above to the sysop because it was eminently uncalled for.  You may be frothing at the mouth too much to understand that, but it absolutely was. 
 
Quote    Reply

RockyMTNClimber    Aga, reply   4/27/2009 10:01:50 AM
 
Yes Australia's homicide rate it finally did get back to 1996 levels (where they were before the ban). I am happy your nation's crime rate is at least back to where it was before in the mid '90s. It's a big deal. You ought to celebrate.
 
Tough that all those other crimes keep going up though (unlike US trends).... Oh, well religions and cult worship are about faith aren't they:

Now for the rest of the story

During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2% and robbery 6.2%. Sexual assault?Australia?s equivalent term for rape?increased 29.9%. Overall, Australia?s violent crime rate rose 42.2%. At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8%: rape dropped 19.2%; robbery decreased 33.2%; aggravated assault dropped 32.2%. Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women (whom ABC reports are arming themselves at record rates because of safety concerns):

(Sourced above from Australian Gov't statistics)
 
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy