The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - September 7, 2008

Advertisement


Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
United States Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: DEAR AMERICA...WHEN ARE WE GOING TO GET SERIOUS?!?
DarthAmerica    5/31/2008 7:55:14 PM
There is a war far more violent than Iraq right on our southern boarder. It's being fought in Mexico. It's killing more people faster than violence in the GWOT. It causes direct casualties to U.S. Citizens. It threatens you families. Our entire way of life depends on the outcome of this conflict. I'm talking about the forgotten war on drugs.

Now, here are the questions I have. Given the consequences of failure and the scope of the conflict. Shouldn't this be a primary concern of the Department of Defense?

If you agree that it is the DoD responsibility. How do you think we should go about fighting this war? If you don't think it's the DoD's responsibility, then why? What other way would you suggest to solve it?

Please take this thread seriously. THIS WILL MATTER.


-DA
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2 3 4   NEXT
00_Chem_AJB       5/31/2008 8:39:19 PM
There are alot of people who think the war on drugs just makes things worse, weaking one cartel will make another stronger, taking away there source of income, IE legalising the drugs where the governments buy up the crops and supplies and give them as perscriptions, those how think that probably don't get that the cartels will instead focus on fighting the government and not each other.
 
Problems fighting cartels:
 
They have public support, the buy people off or make good will guestures like building schools, yet they will leave some poor kids without a father or mother without a second thought, use that against them.
 
They are funded buy every day citizens in our own country, we should inform them of what they are supporting, and offer other means to help with their addiction, they are not criminals just idiots.
 
It is usually up to the police to fight these bandits they are terrorists, police are not ment to fight wars, it is time the miliatry started targeting the strong holds, they may be safe from a police raid but what about a smart bomb? Lets use the Israeli tactics against them. If any one says that is inhumane, they should look at the current picture.
 
This is a covert war the proplem is it requires massive resources and it is hard to keep everything quiet, the public will view this as a pointless quagmire. It is also time we looked at GMing the crop, removing or chaning the enzymes which make the base chemicals needed by the drug trade. As for exisiting crops, destroy them they should be burnt and the soil "salted" (plants usually have a certain margine ing which they can grow change the soil conditions and they wont grow) If they are growen in a building or underground smart bomb it.
 
The government of the farmers who grow these crops for the cartels also need to look at ways of supporting them, as they turn to drug crops for money.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Bob       5/31/2008 9:43:12 PM
I was thinking about this a few hours ago. That town in Mexico that was overrun, the police attacked by a cartel's soldiers. It's frightening stuff.

FARC just lost their man. I wonder how Venezuela plays into all this?

Maybe a war is in order. Attack / seize / freeze their assets. Like that Clancy film, Cellulose Encased Laser Guided Bombs and Willem Dafoe lasing their mansions and vehicles? :)

 
Quote    Reply

tigertony       5/31/2008 9:46:43 PM
  Simply put "Illegal = Mass Corruption".
 
  Now how can i prove this? Before making alcohol illegal it was cheap and not worth boot legging. Now after it was made illegal we got Al Capone and the St Valentines Day Massacre!. So can you name just one bootlegger today?
 
  You cannot win when they have more money,more resources,and a far bigger army,including some of our our own!.
 
   I do think that the only chance we have is to close down our border and use National Guard to aid border patrol or DEA. And actually as a matter of National Security the DoD should have the right to use US Army to keep both illegal drugs and illegal people out.
 
  Now this may help to stop Mexico,but Canada is still in the game!.
 
 
                                                                        tigertony
 
Quote    Reply

xylene       5/31/2008 10:50:32 PM
Instead of flushing money down a toilet in Iraq, use that money to help boost Mexico's economy and also provide better pay and for their troops and police to cut down on corruption. It would not be money wasted, we would probably see dividends in having less illegal immigration, a stronger partner in war on drugs, and a stronger trading partner as well.
 
Also legalize pot in the USA. Let freedom ring.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Bob       6/1/2008 2:03:15 AM

Instead of flushing money down a toilet in Iraq, use that money to help boost Mexico's economy and also provide better pay and for their troops and police to cut down on corruption.
a toilet, ey? that's pretty classy.

amazing that you'd consider iraq a septic tank and then advocate diverting the money that's being sent to our people toward.... the mexican military???




 
Quote    Reply

CJH       6/1/2008 12:31:23 PM

Instead of flushing money down a toilet in Iraq, use that money to help boost Mexico's economy and also provide better pay and for their troops and police to cut down on corruption. It would not be money wasted, we would probably see dividends in having less illegal immigration, a stronger partner in war on drugs, and a stronger trading partner as well.

 

Also legalize pot in the USA. Let freedom ring.

 

I suppose this will become worthwhile after Mexican drug mafiosi fly airliners into our government's buildings (Not out of the question I guess).
Until then, Iraq is a bigger priority.
 
The irony is that they are American citizens who are funding the drug cartels. We definitely do need to emphasize what our drug users are reponsible for bringing about by induging in their habits.
 
Isn't it odd that people who smoke cigarettes are pariahs yet people who snort coke are often respected and highly paid professionals.
 
Either we need to make effective headway against consumption alone or we need to legalize production of drugs (perhaps while also keeping consumption illegal) to pull the financial rug out from under the cartels while we figure out how to deal with use.
 
The harm is usually in the medically unsupervised and use of drugs.
 
I sometimes wonder if legalization wouldn't be better provided that the law mandates that a person's drug use is advertised to all the people around them.
 
Quote    Reply

RockyMTNClimber    Darth Reply   6/1/2008 12:59:32 PM
Darth, I hope all is well in the sand box.
 
The issue you have questioned is IMV an emperor's new clothes thing. McCain, Clinton, Hussein (oh, very sorry, that's Hussein Obama), the DNC, the RNC, Gov. Schwartzenager, the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, The Agricultural Lobby, the Lawyers, the Bankers, Bakers, the Butchers, and the Candlestick Makers, all support open illegal immigration. To draw attention to our "border issues" today is impolitic. The fact that Mexico is being politically influenced by our enemies and members of FARC is not something that is supposed to be discussed in polite conversation. 
 
On the topic of illegal drugs,
As much of the money being controled, generated, and fought over on our border with Mexico today is about illegal immigration (people smuggling), not drugs. Should we just open the borders and do away with that illegal slave trafficing as well?
 
Check Six
 
Rocky
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       6/1/2008 3:46:00 PM

Darth, I hope all is well in the sand box.

 

The issue you have questioned is IMV an emperor's new clothes thing. McCain, Clinton, Hussein (oh, very sorry, that's Hussein Obama), the DNC, the RNC, Gov. Schwartzenager, the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, The Agricultural Lobby, the Lawyers, the Bankers, Bakers, the Butchers, and the Candlestick Makers, all support open illegal immigration. To draw attention to our "border issues" today is impolitic. The fact that Mexico is being politically influenced by our enemies and members of FARC is not something that is supposed to be discussed in polite conversation. 

 

On the topic of illegal drugs,

As much of the money being controled, generated, and fought over on our border with Mexico today is about illegal immigration (people smuggling), not drugs. Should we just open the borders and do away with that illegal slave trafficing as well?

 

Check Six

 

Rocky


Thanks for the well wished. We are all ok...;) BORED which is a good thing IMHO....


...The illegal alien issue is also tied into this as well. One thing I've always known is that business interest have been the only thing truly keeping our borders open for illegal traffic. Anyone who fails to acknowledge that is a ignorant, lying or a criminal. Thing is that shutting down the illegal alien traffic would also have the same effect as stopping the drugs from entering since fundamentally this is all about smuggling. But the drug issue goes a little further IMV. Drug cartels are openly challenging the legitimate Mexican government for control of Mexican territory and even the government itself. If Mexico falls and turns into a failed state. The magnitude of the resulting economic damage cannot be understated. All one needs to do is get the latest statistics for US-Mexican trade to get an idea. This is something that falls into the category of issues the United States Government would fight for.

The problem is that things are almost too far gone to avoid that now. If the Mexicans cannot reign in the cartels very quickly the government will lose legitimacy and Mexico will fragment. Moreover, Mexico doesn't have a political system designed to deal with the loss of a head of state. The cartels have already demonstrated the capability to strike targets very high up in government. If they see that the Mexican government is having success at eliminating their power, what incentive do they have not to destroy the government? Considering that, why should we wait to act?

We won't wait IMHO. But what I'm afraid of is how we will respond. Will it be a carefully planned campaign designed to win? Or will it be some half measure more geared toward securing the business interest rather that the security of the American people? I'm afraid we all know the most likely answer. The cartels are importing about 50 billion through Mexico annually. $50 BILLION and thats wholesale prices. Once the drugs are chopped and cut the return on investment is far greater than that as I'm sure you know. I estimated last night very roughly that U.S. Domestic LE Agencies spend about $45-$50 BILLION on salaries last year using the median salary x the number of LE personnel in the USA. I know it's rough but it gives you an idea of how much money is at stake and the potential for corruption on both sides of the border.

A Few Quick Links generally related:

ht*p://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/06/20040601-4.html---(WHAT A JOKE!!!) Nobody on that list should even be breathing! Just think about what we do routinely to people on other list managed by the DoD/Intel Services. I'd argue that these people on this list harm far more Americans daily than Bin Laden could with a SADM.

h*tp://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm


Very Pi$$ed Off
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       6/1/2008 4:33:24 PM
Like I said, we know who these guys are, we also know where they hide, a few curise missile strikes and JDAMs should be enough to decapitate the cartels, and what happens when you kill the leader of a group of backstabbing greedy thugs?
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

wjr1       6/1/2008 4:42:27 PM
Darth,

I would not hold my breath waiting for common sense to strike if I were you.

I mourn for our country, at times, because we are such a bunch of chuckle heads. Look, nearly everything that is wrong with us right now is self inflicted.

Think about it. We have a 14 trillion dollar economy and are (surprise, surprise) still statistically (the only way you can measure it) at the same level of output as a percent of the worlds manufacturing that we were in the '60's. We have a 200 and some odd year old stable republic (NOT a democracy, BTW) with something like a 40 to 50 year lead in science and technical investment over our main rival, the EU (per the EU). Our environment is cleaner than it has ever been in the industrialized age and there is more soft and hardwood forest acreage existing now than when Washington was president.

Unemployment is at near record low, the stock market is at near record highs, the level of entrepreneurial activity is quite high and would be even higher if government would get out of the way. A key indicator (generally never looked at) is the amount of investment money available for st