Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Surface Forces Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: USN Buys Austrailian
DragonReborn    2/12/2004 2:53:39 AM
www.military.com Can this be considered a Littoral Ship? Is this the way the USN can quickly bild a littoral capacity? ===================================================================== New ship sails through Navy?s early testing The Australian-built HSV 2 Swift is being considered by the Navy as a possible solution to its need for a high-speed combat ship. Four diesel engines drive four water jets that give the aluminum-hulled Swift a top speed of 53 mph. It was tied up at Naval Station Norfolk Tuesday after a demonstration. NORFOLK ? If it?s a new ship the Navy wants, it may not get any better than this. It?s fast, with a top speed of 53 mph. It?s cheap, relatively speaking, at $60 million to $100 million ? about the cost of two F/A-18 Super Hornet jets. It took just 10 months to build, a nanosecond in shipbuilders? schedules. It takes only 40 folks to operate it, very appealing to a Navy seeking smaller crews. And get this, sailors: It?s aluminum and doesn?t need paint. Meet the high-speed vessel Swift, a catamaran from Australia that is pitching its versatility and maneuverability to the Navy and the Army. Flying through the lower Chesapeake Bay and into the slick calm Atlantic on a demonstration run Tuesday, the Swift is being eyed by the Navy as a way to carry 200 to 300 troops, 600 tons of cargo and a helicopter or two through relatively shallow waters. Its twin hulls piercing the waves, the Swift created enough motion Tuesday to sicken some novice riders aboard, earning it the nickname the ?vomit comet.? But the ship made it to the Chesapeake Light 13 miles off shore in 60 minutes; most Navy ships leaving Norfolk?s port take 2½ hours to the light. Navy equipment, from unmanned helicopters to submersibles and specialized boats, that are being considered for use on the Swift fill the experiemental ship?s mission deck on Tuesday, demonstrating the types of gear the Swift can carry. It?s bridge crew numbers just five or six people, compared to 12 to 15 on most Navy ships. No one mans the engine room. The chief engineer is on the bridge. ?I love it,? Cmdr. Mark Sakaguchi, commanding officer of the Swift, said as he finished docking at the Norfolk Naval Station, without help from a tug. A chief petty officer, using a joystick to control the craft?s four water jets, maneuvered the 320-foot long ship to the pier without so much as a nudge. Lookouts using laser-guided range finders, television cameras and radios assured a smooth arrival. ?I think this is everything the Navy is looking for,? Sakaguchi said. However, he warned that the demands on the crew are high. No one can take vacation or time off during the ship?s time at sea. Nor can the crew be expected to work endless hours, he said. Petty Officer 1st class Yosef Seals scans the horizon as the HSV 2 Swift cruises at more than 40 knots off Virginia Beach Tuesday. The Swift requires a total crew of 40 and a bridge crew of five or six. That?s why the Navy is experimenting with rotating two crews to the ship every four months, to allow one to remain ashore for training and rest. Sakaguchi, commanding officer of one crew based out of Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base in Virginia Beach, will turn over command of the ship in another few weeks to a crew based at Ingleside, Texas, home of the mine warfare group. While the ship is assigned to Little Creek, the Navy is using the Swift to experiment with everything from SEAL team mini-subs to unmanned helicopters. The ship?s cavernous 28,000-square-foot mission deck can handle four M1-A1 Abrams battle tanks, a variety of amphibious landing vehicles or a combination of mine-hunting small boats. Robert Clifford is owner of Incat Tasmania, which has built 61 of the catamarans of various sizes during the past 25 years. He?s putting together the latest hull design of about 350 feet, which he hopes the Army and Navy like as they decide between the catamaran or a single-hull ship for a littoral combat ship. ?I have no idea how many they would order,? Clifford said as he rode the Swift. ?There are no requests for proposals.? The Swift can carry 200 to 300 troops, 600 tons of cargo and a helicopter or two through relatively shallow waters. While assigned to Little Creek, the Navy is using the Swift to experiment with SEAL team mini-subs and unmanned helicopters. However, industry and military officials who were aboard Tuesday said they expect the Army to be ready within another month to place an order for a dozen of the vessels. The Navy?s decision is expected later. Clifford?s company has recently joined Bollinger Shipyard Inc. of Lockport, La., which hopes to build the ships in the United States. The Swift is an offspring of the high speed vessel Joint Venture which the Army, Navy and Marine Corps have used in the past two years. About the same size, the Swift offers better crew comforts, such as a larg
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2
DragonReborn    RE:USN Buys Australian    2/12/2004 2:55:11 AM
sorry to the Aussies for the typo, "Australian"
 
Quote    Reply

southern cross    RE:USN Buys Australian    2/12/2004 5:41:59 AM
Great for buisness on austrlia's island state of Tasmania, small state so this will be huge to their economy. is this the same thing as the HMAS Jervis Bay, or just a similar but more military designed boat? from what i hear the HMAS Jervis Bay performed well during East Timor, but anybody know why she is no longer in service?
 
Quote    Reply

Mark F    RE:USN Buys Austrailian   2/12/2004 6:28:44 AM
This is very obviously not a bidder for the LCS contract but both the Army and the Navy have been interested in high-speed transports for the last several years.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aus    RE:USN Buys Austrailian   2/12/2004 6:40:41 AM
US Forces have been trialling both INCAT and AUSTAL twin hulls for about 2 years. They USN, USMC and US army along with the Brits had some observers on board when East Timor was falling apart, so they saw them in operation at a first hand level. They basically decided they wanted to trial them after the observer run. At the time I was in Darwin they took them out for a ride during a tropical storm to show how stable they were compared to other vessels, some of the Army guys lost their crayfish lunch. ;) The INCAT model that the US has been trialling is a larger hull than the Jervis Bay (which was initially a US loaner and then was sold) There were 2 of these being fitted out in Tassie recently (in the last 2 months) and a 3rd is under construction. I spoke to some USMC gents at the Pac 2004 Maritime Conference and they were more than impressed with the Austal vessel thats under eval. They seemed to be fairly confident about buying some as they had passed some fairly rigorous tests off Hawaii, Florida and off Okinawa. Personally my pref is for the Austal vessel, not as sexy looking to the casual observer, but has better functionality and far better build quality. Clifford is a prat. But thats personal issues coming through. ;)
 
Quote    Reply

shawn    RE:USN Buys Austrailian   2/12/2004 10:49:42 AM
HSV photos have been in the Gallery for some time: link link link
 
Quote    Reply

shawn    Ignore my last post (script error)   2/12/2004 10:50:59 AM
HSV photos have been in the Gallery for some time.
 
Quote    Reply

Ex98C    RE:USN Buys Austrailian-GF   2/12/2004 8:43:21 PM
Hey GF I heard the design team that included Austal made the 3 for the LCS design. I must admit that looking at the various entries it would be my top choice
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aus    USN Buys Austrailian-GF   2/12/2004 9:03:43 PM
I'm happy to go to the US if you need a translator, ;) I was in LA and Seattle for a couple of months last year - nice places, although I think those in Seattle understood Australian english a little better.. ;)
 
Quote    Reply

Ex98C    RE:USN Buys Austrailian-GF   2/12/2004 9:15:01 PM
Visiting Boeing?
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aus    RE:USN Buys Austrailian-GF   2/12/2004 9:29:48 PM
No, I was looking at a new turbine technology that used a french transmission system. ;) the concept was developed in Seattle and the test rigs were in LA.
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy