Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Surface Forces Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Dumbing-Down the U.S. Navy
The Lizard King    7/31/2009 1:19:19 PM
ttp://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32595 "Naval Academy Professor Challenges Rising Diversity," ran the headline in The Washington Post. The impression left was that some sorehead was griping because black and Hispanic kids were finally being admitted. The Post's opening paragraphs reinforced the impression. "Of the 1,230 plebes who took the oath of office at the Naval Academy in Annapolis this week, 435 were members of minority groups. It's the most racially diverse class in the nation's 164-year history. Academy leaders say it's a top priority to build a student body that reflects the racial makeup of the Navy and the nation." Who can be against diversity? What the Post gets around to is that 22-year English professor Bruce Fleming objects to a race-based admissions program that was apparently used to create a class that is 35 percent minority. According to Fleming, who once sat on the board of admissions, white applicants must have all As and Bs and test scores of at least 600 on the English and math parts of the SAT even to qualify for a "slate" of 10 applicants, from which only one will be chosen. However, if you check a box indicating you are African-American, Hispanic, Native American or Asian, writes Fleming, "SAT scores to the mid 500s with quite a few Cs in classes ... typically produces a vote of 'qualified' ... with direct admission to Annapolis. They're in and given a pro forma nomination to make it legit." If true, the U.S. Naval Academy is running a two-tier admissions system of the kind that kept Jennifer Gratz out of the University of Michigan and was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. "Minority applicants with scores and grades down to the 300s and Cs and Ds also come, though after a year at our taxpayer-supported remedial school, the Naval Academy Preparatory School." If true, this is a national disgrace. It would represent a U.S. Naval Academy policy of systematic race discrimination, every year, against hundreds of white kids who worked and studied their entire lives for the honor of being appointed to the U.S. Naval Academy and becoming career officers in the Navy or Marine Corps. If true, what Annapolis has done and is doing is worse -- because it is premeditated and programmed racism -- than the cowardly act of the New Haven city government in denying Frank Ricci and the white firefighters the promotions they had won in a competitive exam. At least New Haven could say it acted out of fear of being sued. Yet, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and the Superintendent of the Naval Academy Vice Adm. Jerry Fowler seem quite proud of what they are doing. Fleming quotes the CNO as saying that "diversity is the number one priority" at the academy. Fowler says he wants Annapolis graduates who "looked like" the fleet, where 42 percent of enlisted personnel are nonwhite. The diversity midshipmen, says Fleming, who teaches them, are over-represented in "pre-college lower track courses, mandatory tutoring programs and less-challenging majors. Many struggle to master basic concepts." Thus, though unqualified for college work, these students will be operating the most sophisticated and complex weapons systems ever built -- aircraft carriers, Aegis cruisers, nuclear submarines. "First of all, we're dumbing-down the Naval Academy," charges Fleming. "Second of all, we're dumbing-down the officers corps." Supporting Fleming's claim, 22 percent of incoming plebes in 2009 had SAT scores in math below 600, compared to 12 percent in 2008. If the facts are as Fleming states -- the academy is accepting dumber and dumber students to get its racial composition right -- who can deny that the price of diversity is deliberate acceptance of a less able and competent United States Navy? "Diversity is our number one priority," Roughhead is quoted. Can one imagine Adm. Chester Nimitz or "Bull" Halsey making an insipid statement like that? Can one imagine what Adm. David "Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!" Farragut would have thought of such a policy? Whatever happened to the Hyman Rickover-Jimmy Carter motto for the Naval Academy and U.S. Navy: "Why Not the Best?" Consider. If hundreds of black and Hispanic kids who applied to the academy had been rejected though they had higher grades and SAT scores than those admitted, this story would not have been in the Metro section of the Post. It would have been bannered on page one. And Roughead and Fowler would be explaining to a congressional committee why they should not be relieved of their commands. Fleming, who still teaches at Annapolis, and has likely had some unpleasant moments since he blew the whistle on his superiors, has shown considerable moral courage.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3   NEXT
stbretnco       8/1/2009 2:12:12 AM
_______________________________________________________________________________
I don't hear the USMC or the USA talking about "diversity", but rather about ability to lead on a battlefield and succeed.  I guess it's something the USN ASSUMES that ability and has decided to focus on other things...a thing that the USN may come to regret in a few years.
_______________________________________________________________________________
 
The US Army had flirtations with diversity requirements as well, and it ended badly. I forget when it ended, but there was a time when you got extra points on the promotion roster for being a minority.
 
One would figure the USN would look at the USA's failures related to that and get the picture, however joint operations evidently don't translate into joint lessons learned.
 
Quote    Reply

eldnah       8/1/2009 9:08:28 AM

Have no fear. Annapolis is not alone. The Democrat's Health Care Bill orders the Sec of Health and Human Services to give preference in Federal grant money, contracts and reimbursement rates to medical schools and their affiliated hospitals with a demonstrated record of training minorities.  It looks like a SCOTUS case in the offing.  

 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Ghormley= Stasis   8/1/2009 10:31:29 AM
Halsey = Advance in the Solomons.
 
I'll let others judge.
 
Certainly not entirely fair, but the RESULTS speak for themselves....
 
As to the USA and its flirtation with "diversity" I can remember friends of mine taking EEO Classes as Officers and NCO's...HOWEVER, 8 years of war have tended, I believe, to wonderfully Re-Focus the USA and the USMC (which had a Minority Officer Recruitment Effort-MORE) on battlefield performance not skin colour.
 
Sadly it seems the USN has decided that since it is UNCHALLENGED at sea it can "afford" to focus efforts on things that are secondary to its mission....
 
IMO IF you focus on doing your job, and select those that do their jobs, well, the rest takes care of itself....
 
Quote    Reply

benellim4       8/1/2009 1:11:50 PM
This push is a demographics thing. I can't tell you how many briefs I have sat in where someone from BUPERS has talked about how the nation will look in 2050 and that we have to be diverse so that we can meet our recruiting goals in the future. The people who are minorities now won't necessarily be minorities in 20, 30 or 40 years from now. The Navy has to make inroads into these demographics if it wants to meet its personnel goals in the future.

I hate to say it, but the personnel types have a point. As other demographic segments become larger they will have more and more top performers that we want to recruit. The Navy has a problem now with trying to recruit quality minority recruits (or so says my friend who was a minority recruiter for the USNA.) The problem is that minorities can get into good schools and get good scholarships AND they don't see people that look like them in leadership positions in the Navy. And remember to make a flag officer you need 30+ years, so recruiting now may seem like it is too early. However, 2050 is just 40 years away. The kids they are recruiting now, will be the CNOs in 2050.

Yes, needing someone to look like you in order to join sounds racist, but many quality minority recruits see the USN as a club for white guys. They think that if they join the Navy that they won't advance. (The opposite is usually the case, but without visible minority leaders it's hard for recruiters to make the case.) 

Is this course of action the right one to meet the goals of the future? I don't know. Doing nothing won't help the problem. And one thing the author is overlooking is that academic performance does not necessarily translate to the skills needed to be a good leader. It helps, no doubt, but there is more to it than just being good academically.
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    The Army   8/1/2009 2:13:22 PM
has a reputation, or had a reputation, of being open to talent...and hence was well received in minority communities.  The Navy needs to develop the same reputation....if it doesn't that';s what the navy needs to change, not it's requirements to enter the USNA.
 
Quote    Reply

benellim4       8/1/2009 2:55:45 PM
 
Quote    Reply

Bob Roberts       8/1/2009 3:37:27 PM

For many people these days, especially limp wristed white guilt types, diversity has become a religion in and of itself.  I am of the opinion that any plan or practice that does not result in ?the best man for the job? will ultimately result in an inferior product.  That said all things being equal ?diversity? will eventually take care of itself.  If blatant and egregious racism is prevalent deal with it in an appropriate manner, however at the same time don?t make the mistake of anointing some body of people the status of victim for eternity for some real or perceived slight thereby retarding their development for the foreseeable future in some half-baked attempt at helping them.

 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Halsey dumb tactician, Ghormley start from zero and lay logistic groundwork for future success.    8/1/2009 5:04:59 PM

Halsey = Advance in the Solomons.

 

I'll let others judge.

 

Certainly not entirely fair, but the RESULTS speak for themselves....

 

As to the USA and its flirtation with "diversity" I can remember friends of mine taking EEO Classes as Officers and NCO's...HOWEVER, 8 years of war have tended, I believe, to wonderfully Re-Focus the USA and the USMC (which had a Minority Officer Recruitment Effort-MORE) on battlefield performance not skin colour.

 

Sadly it seems the USN has decided that since it is UNCHALLENGED at sea it can "afford" to focus efforts on things that are secondary to its mission....

 

IMO IF you focus on doing your job, and select those that do their jobs, well, the rest takes care of itself....

Halsey Typhoon....

 
What if they don't know what they are doing?
 
 

 
 
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       8/1/2009 6:15:56 PM
"Doing nothing won't help the problem. And one thing the author is overlooking is that academic performance does not necessarily translate to the skills needed to be a good leader. It helps, no doubt, but there is more to it than just being good academically."
 
This is not directed at you, Benellim:
I say the problem is in defining the problem.  When the problem is defined as being "we don't have a diverse officer corps" we've just defined our way into a problem, not out of one.  Race is irrelevant to leadership.  Race is irrelevant to capability.  Not having "enough" of one minority or another is irrelevant to both.  We do not need to lower standards in any way just so we can get more minorities in uniform.  One standard, one bar to pass, regardless of irrelevant factors like ethnicity.  Those who are called will respond, no matter what their color--and if that means all ethnic groups are "underrepresented" or "overrepresented" (since at any given moment they all must be one or the other no matter what is done), so be it.  It is only the total force levels that ned to be controlled, and only because we can't get enough officers total should we then make changes in standards, changes that affect all assessions programs, not just one aimed specifically at minorities.
 
 
Quote    Reply

benellim4       8/1/2009 6:27:07 PM
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy