The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 24, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Surface Forces Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Dumbing-Down the U.S. Navy
The Lizard King    7/31/2009 1:19:19 PM
ttp://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32595

"Naval Academy Professor Challenges Rising Diversity," ran the headline in The Washington Post.

The impression left was that some sorehead was griping because black and Hispanic kids were finally being admitted.

The Post's opening paragraphs reinforced the impression.

"Of the 1,230 plebes who took the oath of office at the Naval Academy in Annapolis this week, 435 were members of minority groups. It's the most racially diverse class in the nation's 164-year history. Academy leaders say it's a top priority to build a student body that reflects the racial makeup of the Navy and the nation."

Who can be against diversity?

What the Post gets around to is that 22-year English professor Bruce Fleming objects to a race-based admissions program that was apparently used to create a class that is 35 percent minority.

According to Fleming, who once sat on the board of admissions, white applicants must have all As and Bs and test scores of at least 600 on the English and math parts of the SAT even to qualify for a "slate" of 10 applicants, from which only one will be chosen.

However, if you check a box indicating you are African-American, Hispanic, Native American or Asian, writes Fleming, "SAT scores to the mid 500s with quite a few Cs in classes ... typically produces a vote of 'qualified' ... with direct admission to Annapolis. They're in and given a pro forma nomination to make it legit."

If true, the U.S. Naval Academy is running a two-tier admissions system of the kind that kept Jennifer Gratz out of the University of Michigan and was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

"Minority applicants with scores and grades down to the 300s and Cs and Ds also come, though after a year at our taxpayer-supported remedial school, the Naval Academy Preparatory School."

If true, this is a national disgrace. It would represent a U.S. Naval Academy policy of systematic race discrimination, every year, against hundreds of white kids who worked and studied their entire lives for the honor of being appointed to the U.S. Naval Academy and becoming career officers in the Navy or Marine Corps.

If true, what Annapolis has done and is doing is worse -- because it is premeditated and programmed racism -- than the cowardly act of the New Haven city government in denying Frank Ricci and the white firefighters the promotions they had won in a competitive exam. At least New Haven could say it acted out of fear of being sued.

Yet, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and the Superintendent of the Naval Academy Vice Adm. Jerry Fowler seem quite proud of what they are doing.

Fleming quotes the CNO as saying that "diversity is the number one priority" at the academy. Fowler says he wants Annapolis graduates who "looked like" the fleet, where 42 percent of enlisted personnel are nonwhite.

The diversity midshipmen, says Fleming, who teaches them, are over-represented in "pre-college lower track courses, mandatory tutoring programs and less-challenging majors. Many struggle to master basic concepts."

Thus, though unqualified for college work, these students will be operating the most sophisticated and complex weapons systems ever built -- aircraft carriers, Aegis cruisers, nuclear submarines.

"First of all, we're dumbing-down the Naval Academy," charges Fleming. "Second of all, we're dumbing-down the officers corps."

Supporting Fleming's claim, 22 percent of incoming plebes in 2009 had SAT scores in math below 600, compared to 12 percent in 2008.

If the facts are as Fleming states -- the academy is accepting dumber and dumber students to get its racial composition right -- who can deny that the price of diversity is deliberate acceptance of a less able and competent United States Navy?

"Diversity is our number one priority," Roughhead is quoted. Can one imagine Adm. Chester Nimitz or "Bull" Halsey making an insipid statement like that? Can one imagine what Adm. David "Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!" Farragut would have thought of such a policy?

Whatever happened to the Hyman Rickover-Jimmy Carter motto for the Naval Academy and U.S. Navy: "Why Not the Best?"

Consider. If hundreds of black and Hispanic kids who applied to the academy had been rejected though they had higher grades and SAT scores than those admitted, this story would not have been in the Metro section of the Post. It would have been bannered on page one. And Roughead and Fowler would be explaining to a congressional committee why they should not be relieved of their commands.

Fleming, who still teaches at Annapolis, and has likely had some unpleasant moments since he blew the whistle on his superiors, has shown considerable moral courage.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2
Herald12345    ????????????????????????   7/31/2009 3:59:07 PM
Both Jimmy Carter and William Halsey were incompetent bunglers. Carter was technically unable to stand a proper watch without supervision and Halsey as a jdae grounded destroyers, and as an admiral, ran his fleets into storms. This article writer needs to review his HISTORY and check his BIGOTRY at the door.

I suppose "Jocko" Clark was unqualified because he was a "minority"?

Herald
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       7/31/2009 5:40:39 PM
Herald, you're really letting your hatred of Halsey get the better of you.
 
You are completely missing the point of the article, which is that minority applicants are accepted with lower scores than required for caucasian applicants.
 
Step back, take a deep breath, and read it again.....ignoring the mention of Adm. Halsey and Pres. Carter in the article. They are fluff comments added as most of the general public who reads the article knows their names.
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       7/31/2009 6:16:43 PM
The ONLY bigotry in that article is found right here, in the words of the CNO and the Superintendent.  There is no place for racism in the USN, most of all not from the officers in charge of it.  Their words are fundamentally unAmerican and they ought to be fired for it:
 
"Yet, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and the Superintendent of the Naval Academy Vice Adm. Jerry Fowler seem quite proud of what they are doing.

"Fleming quotes the CNO as saying that "diversity is the number one priority" at the academy. Fowler says he wants Annapolis graduates who "looked like" the fleet, where 42 percent of enlisted personnel are nonwhite."
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Reply to Sbret and WP   7/31/2009 7:05:45 PM

The ONLY bigotry in that article is found right here, in the words of the CNO and the Superintendent.  There is no place for racism in the USN, most of all not from the officers in charge of it.  Their words are fundamentally unAmerican and they ought to be fired for it:

 

"Yet, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and the Superintendent of the Naval Academy Vice Adm. Jerry Fowler seem quite proud of what they are doing.



"Fleming quotes the CNO as saying that "diversity is the number one priority" at the academy. Fowler says he wants Annapolis graduates who "looked like" the fleet, where 42 percent of enlisted personnel are nonwhite."

 

 


Underlined is stupid. We can find enough bright kids who can make the cut. Just need to test all 3,000,000 of them in each cohort and offer the academy as an option. Don't need a quota or test score skewing to get diversity. I just was angered at the article author for citing two idiots as examples of quality naval officers or somehow implying that test scores equal competence. It takes far more than doing well on a test to turn out a quality naval officer. Hence the reference to Jocko Clark  a very good Native American naval officer who had some acute academic problems when he attended the Naval Academy.
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Let it go Herald   7/31/2009 7:53:33 PM
Halsey WASN'T an idiot...Sorry.    Let YOUR Prejudice go....it will set you free(er).
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY       7/31/2009 7:57:00 PM
Fleming quotes the CNO as saying that "diversity is the number one priority" at the academy. Fowler says he wants Annapolis graduates who "looked like" the fleet, where 42 percent of enlisted personnel are nonwhite."
 
I kinda thought the No. 1 Priority might be producing a fleet that dominated the Naval-Aerospace Battlespace.  Who knew it was to produce a "diverse" fleet?  Ok this explains a LOT about the USN in the recent past...less focus on Naval Professionalism, to include Acquisition, but a lot of focus on issues secondary to its TRUE MISSION.
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345       7/31/2009 8:24:18 PM

Halsey WASN'T an idiot...Sorry.    Let YOUR Prejudice go....it will set you free(er).

 
POLITICS: A Word About Accountability and Leadership

A lot of conservatives are up in arms about John McCain's call for the firing of Chris Cox as SEC Chairman due to the collapse of numerous Wall Street firms on his watch. There is a more than fair argument against McCain's position: that Cox is a smart, capable conservative and expert in the area who hasn't really done anything wrong, or at least hadn't until the recent move against short sellers (I don't buy that Cox is above criticism, but I don't think this mess is in any way his fault). But there is also a case to be made for the emerging McCain leadership style. As McCain explained today:

Dwight David Eisenhower, when he was commander and he was in charge of the largest military operation in history, the invasion of Normandy. He went to his quarters the night before the invasion and wrote out two letters. One of them sent a letter of congratulation, a messgae of congratulations to the brave Americans who landed in Normandy and made the most successful invasion and partly brought about the beginning of the end of World War II. The other letter he wrote out was his resignation from the United States army, taking full responsibility for the failure of that invasion.

My friends that kind of accountability and responsibility is missing in Washington today and that's why I believe the chairman of the SEC should resign.

That's McCain's view in a nutshell: you produce results, or you step aside, regardless of how well you performed your duties. You own your watch. It's a decidedly military outlook, as befits a man who spent so many years in the Navy. It's perhaps an odd way for McCain to approach leadership - in his book Faith of My Fathers, McCain movingly recounts the bitterness he inherited over how his grandfather was scapegoated unfairly by Admiral Halsey for a mistake Halsey himself made in steering the fleet too close to a storm, mistreatment that McCain ascribes as a possible cause for the elder Admiral McCain's fatal heart attack on his return from the war.

I don't, personally, think that this unforgiving, only-results-matter management style is the best possible way to run an organization in terms of motivating people, and neither is it really a good or fair way to treat subordinates, but it's one well-established leadership style, and it's been successful for plenty of people in business, the military, politics and sports. Certainly it's a sharp contrast to President Bush; while Bush has sacked a lot of people (including Harvey Pitt, his first SEC Chairman who was also just in the wrong place at the wrong time), he's nonetheless frequently found himself in trouble for leaving loyal but incompetent subordinates in place too long after they became obvious political liabilities. McCain is sending a message: the likes of Mike Brown, Alberto Gonzales and Scott McClellan will not be left in their jobs in his White House. Loyalty will give way to accountability.

 Halsey was a no good incompetent person all the way down the line.
 
Nothing changes fact. Nothing.
 
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Yes Halsey was such an incompetent...   7/31/2009 9:03:40 PM
that he took over from a paralyzed and failing Ghormley and WON the Battle for Guadalcanal.  And then proceeded to advance up the "Slot" destroying the Imperial Japanese Naval Airforces and Light Forces, setting the stage for the success at Tarawa and later the Battle of the Philippine Sea.  Man that's IMCOMPETENCE.
 
You are too Binary.  People are not either "idiots" or "Capable."  They are more sorted, Halsey was good, better than Ghormley, but not great.  So let it go.
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    The Navy has lost its way...   7/31/2009 9:12:55 PM
The goal of the fleet and its officer corps is NOT to match the colour of the fleet.  It's to command men and women and vessels, in stressful situations and the ultimate stressful situation, Combat.  The crew will not be thinking, "Ensign Minority is an idiot and gonna get us all KILLED, but I sure do respect the fact that s/he's Black like me."  I've never met anyone who had a doofus boss, but was happy that the Affirmative Action Box had been marked off...if the US Navy can't understand this, then it has a very deep problem, now and in 20 years as these defective officers assume senior positions.
 
My friends and family serve(d) in the Ground Forces (USA and USMC) never heard them discuss the RACE of their NCO's and Officers, just their competence.  I don't hear the USMC or the USA talking about "diversity", but rather about ability to lead on a battlefield and succeed.  I guess it's something the USN ASSUMES that ability and has decided to focus on other things...a thing that the USN may come to regret in a few years.
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Rhe Battle fo Rennell Island, JFKY    8/1/2009 1:55:56 AM

that he took over from a paralyzed and failing Ghormley and WON the Battle for Guadalcanal.  And then proceeded to advance up the "Slot" destroying the Imperial Japanese Naval Airforces and Light Forces, setting the stage for the success at Tarawa and later the Battle of the Philippine Sea.  Man that's IMCOMPETENCE.

 

You are too Binary.  People are not either "idiots" or "Capable."  They are more sorted, Halsey was good, better than Ghormley, but not great.  So let it go.

Over "Jocko" Clark's objections of course.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       8/1/2009 2:12:12 AM
_______________________________________________________________________________
I don't hear the USMC or the USA talking about "diversity", but rather about ability to lead on a battlefield and succeed.  I guess it's something the USN ASSUMES that ability and has decided to focus on other things...a thing that the USN may come to regret in a few years.
_______________________________________________________________________________
 
The US Army had flirtations with diversity requirements as well, and it ended badly. I forget when it ended, but there was a time when you got extra points on the promotion roster for being a minority.
 
One would figure the USN would look at the USA's failures related to that and get the picture, however joint operations evidently don't translate into joint lessons learned.
 
Quote    Reply

eldnah       8/1/2009 9:08:28 AM

Have no fear. Annapolis is not alone. The Democrat's Health Care Bill orders the Sec of Health and Human Services to give preference in Federal grant money, contracts and reimbursement rates to medical schools and their affiliated hospitals with a demonstrated record of training minorities.  It looks like a SCOTUS case in the offing.  

 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Ghormley= Stasis   8/1/2009 10:31:29 AM
Halsey = Advance in the Solomons.
 
I'll let others judge.
 
Certainly not entirely fair, but the RESULTS speak for themselves....
 
As to the USA and its flirtation with "diversity" I can remember friends of mine taking EEO Classes as Officers and NCO's...HOWEVER, 8 years of war have tended, I believe, to wonderfully Re-Focus the USA and the USMC (which had a Minority Officer Recruitment Effort-MORE) on battlefield performance not skin colour.
 
Sadly it seems the USN has decided that since it is UNCHALLENGED at sea it can "afford" to focus efforts on things that are secondary to its mission....
 
IMO IF you focus on doing your job, and select those that do their jobs, well, the rest takes care of itself....
 
Quote    Reply

benellim4       8/1/2009 1:11:50 PM
This push is a demographics thing. I can't tell you how many briefs I have sat in where someone from BUPERS has talked about how the nation will look in 2050 and that we have to be diverse so that we can meet our recruiting goals in the future. The people who are minorities now won't necessarily be minorities in 20, 30 or 40 years from now. The Navy has to make inroads into these demographics if it wants to meet its personnel goals in the future.

I hate to say it, but the personnel types have a point. As other demographic segments become larger they will have more and more top performers that we want to recruit. The Navy has a problem now with trying to recruit quality minority recruits (or so says my friend who was a minority recruiter for the USNA.) The problem is that minorities can get into good schools and get good scholarships AND they don't see people that look like them in leadership positions in the Navy. And remember to make a flag officer you need 30+ years, so recruiting now may seem like it is too early. However, 2050 is just 40 years away. The kids they are recruiting now, will be the CNOs in 2050.

Yes, needing someone to look like you in order to join sounds racist, but many quality minority recruits see the USN as a club for white guys. They think that if they join the Navy that they won't advance. (The opposite is usually the case, but without visible minority leaders it's hard for recruiters to make the case.) 

Is this course of action the right one to meet the goals of the future? I don't know. Doing nothing won't help the problem. And one thing the author is overlooking is that academic performance does not necessarily translate to the skills needed to be a good leader. It helps, no doubt, but there is more to it than just being good academically.
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    The Army   8/1/2009 2:13:22 PM
has a reputation, or had a reputation, of being open to talent...and hence was well received in minority communities.  The Navy needs to develop the same reputation....if it doesn't that';s what the navy needs to change, not it's requirements to enter the USNA.
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy