Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Surface Forces Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: T-45 Sea Viper dealyed (PAAMS)
John G    3/13/2009 11:18:59 AM
Well looks like HERALD was right the whole time I'm sad to say. As per the FT: Warship missile system delayed By Sylvia Pfeifer, Defence Industries Correspondent Published: March 13 2009 02:14 | Last updated: March 13 2009 02:14 The Royal Navy?s new Type 45 destroyers will initially have to go to sea without their main anti-aircraft missile system, the National Audit Office warns
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
HERALD1357    Link to story   3/14/2009 8:06:56 AM

Well looks like HERALD was right the whole time I'm sad to say.

As per the FT:

Warship missile system delayed
By Sylvia Pfeifer, Defence Industries Correspondent

Published: March 13 2009 02:14 | Last updated: March 13 2009 02:14

The Royal Navy?s new Type 45 destroyers will initially have to go to sea without their main anti-aircraft missile system, the National Audit Office warns
 
Well let's see now? They've called it PAAMS and now Sea Viper? Hpow mjany mjarketing changes are they going to try?
 
Now that the ASTER's crappy seeker problems are emerging despite the propaganda, there has to be some political cover to smokescreen a possible MoD rethink of that whole lousy missile system?
 
Can SAMPSON handle ESSM Block IV?  It has an ATG AMRAAM seeker planned as a build-in. And there is always surface to air Sea METEOR

 

Yes. Its not too late to use PLAN B.. 
 
Herald
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics