Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Surface Forces Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise
AdamB    11/11/2007 2:07:10 PM
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced By MATTHEW HICKLEY 10th November 2007 Daily Mail When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed. At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders. That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory. American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board. By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier. According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy. The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat. One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age. The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon. The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines. And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it. According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines. It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence. Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard". The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels. Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors. Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War. He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans. "It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan." In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time. dailymail.co.uk
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2 3   NEXT
Nanheyangrouchuan       11/11/2007 3:59:04 PM
Well, we can thank any number of MNCs for supplying the hardware and software to China, a few European "allies" for helping China submarine training and lastly and most significantly our doormats in State for hampering intel efforts and forcing the Pentagon to allow PLAN unfettered access to everything.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       11/11/2007 5:03:01 PM
The problem with US shipbuilding industry and USAF's aging fleet makes the situation growingly bleaker.
 
If there's any conventional naval warfare between the US and PRC, it would be a sub war, subs vs subs, and the first of its kind. Traditional surface warships is going to be nothing but targets in this kind of warfare. Nazi Germany operated about 300 U-boats and the USN had about 260. Nazis failed to cut-off allied shipping due to the fact that allied fleet 1. built ships faster than Germans can sink and 2. had at least three times more frigates/DDs/DEs to protect convoys with help from hundreds of land based patrol aircrafts and sub-hunting TFs. IJN didn't have such luxury, had too few destroyers and too many of them were sent to deliver troops and supply in Guadacanal and lost, so they lost the shipping and the war.
 
Please note that subs are things you can build with speed. Germans built 118 Type XXI and 61 Type XXIII boats in the last two years of WW2. I wonder how fast US can build SSNs.
 
Strategically, the situation of Japan is no different than Great Britain during WW2. The primary mission of USN to protect Japan is to provide her with security of sea lanes. Land-based missiles and aircrafts can deter and destroy any commie surface ships in hostile posture, and the ones that slipped through can be traced and destroyed by major surface combatants as well as SSNs. Neither did Nazi Kriegmarine nor Kaiserlische Marine ships operated away from Germany survived long enough to do enough damage.
 
Taiwan is not in strategic danger unless Japan is in danger. If Japan and Guam are safe, then Taiwan is just a strategic trap for commie ships, surface or underwater.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       11/11/2007 6:14:42 PM
this has been discussed on a few other forums, the general view is that paper has screwed up an earlier sighting and is about 12 months out.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    GF is right;    11/11/2007 6:39:06 PM
This is OLD news from a naval debacle off Guam.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

EW3       11/11/2007 6:44:37 PM

this has been discussed on a few other forums, the general view is that paper has screwed up an earlier sighting and is about 12 months out.

 

 



UK papers seem to bring this up every month or so and leave the date it occurred out of the article. 
Rather strange.
 
Quote    Reply

Softwar    Oct 07 - Okinawa   11/12/2007 11:59:07 AM
Yellichink posted that this happened in OCT 07 off Okinawa.
 
Quote    Reply

EW3       11/12/2007 8:31:50 PM

Yellichink posted that this happened in OCT 07 off Okinawa.



What year? 
As I recall it happened in '06. 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

locutus    Other Considerations   11/13/2007 6:13:42 AM
Article raises some other questions besides possible poor ASW.
 
 
Quote    Reply

locutus    ???   11/13/2007 6:16:44 AM
 
Quote    Reply

locutus    One last time   11/13/2007 6:17:28 AM
ht*p://informationdissemination.blogspot.com/2007/11/song-class-submarine-resurfaces-again.html
 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics