|
|
|
New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
It was a national humiliation.....
musloko-maro
3/5/2009 6:27:24 PM
|
JANAT-HAPPY JIHADI-HOODLUMS OF ISLAM
By S.P. Attri ( USA )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 We are face to face with Islam?s barbarism, that is polar-opposite of ourconcept of sanctity of life. We ( Hindus ) want to save & salvage life,they( Sullas ) want to extinguish life, kill, catch & haul Kafir-convertees, &establish Allah?s Empire all over the world. The Janat-HappyJihadi-Hoodlumswant to kill & get killed, they are blood-thirsty ( for Kafir-Blood ).Islamclaims to be a religion of peace, love, & brotherhood. This is ashameful-mockery of truth, and a stunning & wayward inconsistency of Islam.>Islam is an apex of barbarism, inhumanity, & atrocities. What is needed tohandle these horrendous-hoodlums, is not flower but a sledge-hammer.Civility has to go outside the door, when defeating these Islamic hordes ofcriminals. The Jihad & Jihadis need to go to jail & not to janat. Thejihadis need to rot in Jhanam ( Allah?s Hell ). 2. Islam?s Sharia laws arefar-famed for their brutality & savageness, they dictate decapitating heads,amputating limbs, among a whole variety of beastly & barbaric punishments.What is overlooked by Hindus & other Kafirs is that, the context of thesehorrible laws is Quran itself, whichdocuments> & commands these ruthlesspunishments. There is no humaneness or kindnessin Sharia laws. Barbarism &Senseless-Killing is manifested at its peak inIslam. The conflict betweenIslamic & Non-Islamic societies has been namedas " Clash Of Civilizations "by Prof. Hutington, but actually it is a "Clash Of Ignorance,> " becauseIslam can hardly be considered civilized. Islam is barbarism, itis a cult ofstupidity & ignorance. Its priests & politicians are the worstculprits ofbarbarism, they are using the teachings of Islam, as the sourceof theirlivlihood, as a means of securing followers, and achieving theirambitions,through the preaching & practice of barbarism.> 3. At this point in time,the specter of Islam is hovering over thecontinent of Europe, and thepotential flutter & flitter of Allah?s Wrath,is hanging over the heads ofEuropean-Kafirs. The frightening vision offuture Islamic might & Islamicrule, is staring them right in the eye. Theirnightmare is just beginning &there is no European-Shield against Islam,with the present attitude ofphoney-liberal politicians of Europe. Someconcerned Europeans argue that,Europe has only two options before it:> a. Islamization of Europe or> b.Europeanization of Islam> The latter option has less than zero chance. It isZilch, Zip. Those whosuggest this as an option, don?t know a didly aboutIslam.> This option would be like a Crash Of Islam, it would be totallyagainstthe word of Allah?s Messenger, Imbecile Hazrat Mohammad, who hastheintercessory power, for each & every Moslem. Islam will never agreetomodernity, even in the name of Europeanization or any otherfancy,imaginative label. This will be viewed as " Attack On Islam, " andslogansof " Islam Khatrey Mein Hai ( Islam is in danger ) " shall bluster &clamorthe skies of Europe.> Thus Islam will remain as " Enemy Number One OfEurope. "> 4. What is more likely to happen is that, Moslems living inEurope, aswell as in the United States, shall perpetrate their " BarbaricMedievalArabic " customs inside the Western societies, regardless of whethertheWestern societies recognize this as a threat or not. The continuanceofthese barbaric Islamic customs in the West, is guaranteed due to amalaisewide-spread in the West ( as well as in India ), this is the "disease ofpolitical correctness. " The phoney-liberal politicians of theWest ( aswell as of India ) will not do anything about the barbaric laws ofIslam,especially the oppression & persecution of women ( even insideWesternsocieties ), such as female circumcision, mutilations, and othersocialcalamities inflicted on women, these shall continue.> 5. Thesixty-four thousand dollar question is how, the educated Moslemwomen insidethe Western societies, will act/react. It would seem logicalthat mosteducated Moslem women will feel foolish, if they continue to takethe Moslemabuse. This realization will force the educated Moslem women toscratch theirheads, to figure out their problem inside the camp & controlof Islam. Mostof them are likely to find it difficult, to forge a a closefriendship withIslam. Eventually, they might decide that, they are fed upwith thebackwardness of Islam.> The phoney-liberal politicians of Europe ( andIndia ), who arecelebrating multi-culturism through the existence & influxof Moslemimmigrants, and are foolishly hoping for reform & modernization ofIslam,are ignoring the brutality & barbarism of Islam. They fall way shortofrecognizing the fundamental-reality that, it is Impossible To SituateIslamWithin Modernity. And Islam will continue to get away with, itsceremony ofmurder ( Jihad ), due to the stupidity of phoney-liberalpoliticians.> 6. Any association of Islam with Enlightenment, leads to "failure ofIslam, " and cries & crisis within the Islamic Community.> Dr.Wafa Sultan says:> " Moslem is an irrational creature, and the things thathe has learned,overpower his mind, and inflame his feelings. That is why hehas turned intoan inferior creature, who cannot control himself, and respondto events,which criticize Islam, in a rational way. "> 7. The opposition touncouth & ruthlessly-militaristic Islam, and to itsimbecilic clergy, is notan easy task. But that does not mean that, a potentreaction & defenseagainst Islam, cannot be put together. Not only it can beformulated, butIslam itself can be rebutted & defeated, by people who havecourage & arewilling to put in resolute effort.> Surinder Paul Attri>>>> On Mon, Dec 1,2008 at 4:05 PM, surinder attri wrote:>> THE HORRIDFACE OF ISLAMIC-TERROR> By S.P. Attri (USA )> ---------------------------------------------------------> 1. Thepeople of India ( and of the world ) in general, and of Mumbai inparticular,have just beheld, the nauseating-face of Islamic-Terror inMumbai. Thesilky-soft & pussy-footing approaches of the UPA government,have brought therepulsive face of Islamic-Terror to several Indian cities,the most recentone is the city of Mumbai. Terrorists continue to attackIndia, because Indiadoes not retaliate. There is also the question ofcomposite culture &secularism ( in reality it is pseudo-secularism ), onthe basis of which theUPA government is trying to bring about Hindu-MuslimUnity in India. Thenon-violence school of UPA is trying to solve theproblems of India, on thebasis of this theory. Wave after wave of terroristattacks against the citiesof India, is the consequence of this bankrupttheory, the latest episode isthe nightmare of Mumbai, the UPA government isto blame, but Indiansparticularly the Hindus & the foreign tourists, had topay the price forUPA's incompetence.> 2. Has the UPA government solved the problem ofHindu-Muslim unity ?> Hardly ! They have done no such thing. They are makingsuch a fetish ofHindu-Muslim Unity, totally ignoring the reality, which isthat to a Moslem,Hindu-Muslim Unity means, the subjugation of the HinduMajority by theMuslim-Minority, the way it had been during the period ofIslamic Rule inIndia.> Islamic Clergy talks of Universal Brotherhood, butwhat comes out of Islamis, that any body who is not a Moslem, shall not beadmitted into thisbrotherhood, most likely he shall have his throat slit.>>3. How can you live peacefully with a religion whose principleisIntolerance, which says blatantly that Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels )shallnot be tolerated ? How can you live peacefully or have compositeculturewith a people, who follow a religion that teaches intolerance ofthose whodo not subscribe to their religion ? How can Hindu-Muslim unity bearrivedat when, Moslems go on converting Hindus practically all over (Pakistan,Bangladesh, and India?Kashmir ), while Hindus are advised not toconvert anyMoslem ?> Can the Moslems be made tolerant & harmless ?> Not achance, in the spectrum of possibilities !> The kind of teaching & preachingthat the Moslems receive, from theirMullahs & Maulvies eggs them on to wars.Like Christians, they have engagedin religious wars for 1400 years, they arenot about to abandon theirprofitable business, of Islamic-Propagation &Domination through Jehad.Islam was born in blood, it survives throughblood-spilling, and it shallcontinue its blood-letting as long it survivesor is allowed to survive.>>> 4. In spite of historic examples of Islam'smammoth-barbarism, the UPAtypes have chosen to ignoring the stinking recordof Islam, hurt the Hindu,and appease the Moslem. Some blatant examples ofAnti-Hindu Bias of the UPAtypes & of its ineptness are:> a. It was ManmohanSingh who tried to grant pardon to Afzal Guru ( aconvicted-terrorist ), hisUPA cohorts were talking politely to relatives ofterrorists, for gettingsome Moslem votes.> b. UPA government has totally failed to stop illegalmigration ofterrorists, across the border from Pakistan & Bangladesh. Infact, the UPAtypes have colluded with Muslim League, Majlis, & Islamists ofAssam.Thousands of Pakistanis coming to India as visitors, never returntoPakistan on expiry of their visas. UPA government does not even knowwherethey are, let alone take any action against them.> c. Because of itsincompetence, the response of UPA to Mumbai-Terror, wasslow, confused, andinefficient. The forces initially sent to the scene wereinexperienced policeofficers, many of them were killed. It took them (UPA ) some time to graspthe scope of the attack. The terrorists had killedover a hundred & woundedthree hundred, before the skilled Commando forcesof the military ( MARCOS &NSG ) were deployed.> d. Several local Moslems helped the terrorists, whonot only provided themshelter, but also showed them around places & policestations. The widelyheld view is that, terrorist foot-prints go back toPakistan.> e. The performance of Indian Intelligence agencies, both at state&federal level, under UPA watch, has been pathetic.> f. And so on & on.> 5.On account of superficial knowledge or total ignorance of Islam ( anditshatred of Kafirs ), on the part of UPA types, & its chosen professionofvote-bank politics, they are dooming the Hindu population of India forsure.> The ignoramuses of the UPA bunch have totally failed to realize that,theMoslem terrorists are not just following the dictates of a commandant.Theirmaster is Allah, and they are doing Jehad in Allah's name. All Kafirs(Non-Moslem Infidels ) are their target, all infidels are equal(equal-Kafirs ). Unless this fact is clearly understood by the Hindus (andby the democracies of the world ), they cannot stand together toconfrontAllah's Mujahideens.> In attacking Mumbai, the Moslem-Terroristsattacked the Dar-Ul-Harb ofIndia. They need no permission to attack aDar-Ul-Harb. Islam allows Moslemsto kill all those who are not of theirreligion. Quran clearly states:> " Kill the infidels if they do not becomeMohammedans. They must be put tothe sword. "> The anti-national gang ofIndia, comprising Leftists, UPA types, andPhoney-Liberal Hindus, have allcontributed to the act of, bold terroristJehad on Mumbai. These ignoramusesblame the dreadful terror practicedduring Jehad ( Islam's Holy War ), on theactions of some misguided Moslemyouth, rather than tell it like it is, thatis:> Islam is a cruel & cunning scheme of terror. Islam goads itsfollowers,with the promise of a beautiful Janat ( Islam's Paradise ), withitsluxurious surroundings & wildest sex with 72 Houries for each Moslem.Thisis a cunning promise of Islam, which motivates Moslem youth tosecurefollowers of Islam, through terror, torture, and treachery ( the toolsofJehad ). A Moslem treats Jehad as the most sacred duty.>> 6. The fiveNon-Jehadic pillars of Islam, provide no guarantee to aMoslem, for entryinto Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ). But Jehad, whichrequires a Moslem tomurder, maime, and mutilate Non-Moslem Infidels ( theKafirs ), provides anAbsolute-Guarantee of entry into Janat.>> Says one Hadith:> " Leaving forJehad in the way of Allah, in the morning or evening, willmerit a rewardbetter than the whole world, and all that is in it. "> Another Hadith says:>" The martyr will desire to return to this world, and be killed ten timesforthe sake of the great honor, that has been bestowed upon him. "> " Paradiselies under the shades of swords. "> " Acting as Allah's soldier for onenight in a battlefield, is superior tosaying prayers for 2000 years. "> " Hewho travels to participate in Jehad, the dust he encounters in theprocess,shall become fragrance for him, on the Day Of Judgment. "> 7. In theNightmare that has just visited the city of Mumbai, the darkvision ofIslamic-Terror, has come upon India & on Hindus in particular. Thedetails ofHindu's Future under the UPA government, are not difficult topredict. NoIndian and certainly no Hindu, should have any illusions, aboutthecompetency of the UPA government. UPA needs to be thrown out !> SurinderPaul Attri>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:26 AM, wrote:>> It was a national humiliation>> Arvind Lavakare>>> Arvind Lavakaremay be 71, but the fire in his belly burns stronger thanin many people halfhis age. The economics post-graduate worked with theReserve Bank of Indiaand several private and public sector companies beforeretiring in 1997. Hisfirst love, however, remains sports. An accreditedcricket umpire in Mumbai,he has reported and commented on cricket matchesfor newspapers, Doordarshanand AIR. Lavakare has also been regularlywriting on politics since 1997, andpublished a monograph, The Truth AboutArticle 370, in 2005.>> Hang yourheads in shame, my countrymen. Do it because a dozen-oddterrorists traveled500 nautical miles of the Arabian sea from Karachi toMumbai's Gateway ofIndia, just opposite the grandiose Taj Mahal Hotel andproceeded to humblethe city of 16.4 million into utter helplessness forover 48 hours even asover 125 civilians and some distinguished professionalsecurity men losttheir lives to the hand grenades and rifle bullets of afanatical mindset. Itwas a humiliation worse than the drubbing the Chinesearmy gave us in 1961.>>It was because our motherland, India, is a soft nation, tes ted and provensoseveral times. Despite the weighty evidence of Clement Atlee, theBritain'spost World War II prime minister to the contrary, the Congresspartybrainwashed the entire nation, including the press, that it wasthenon-violence strategy of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi that broughtusindependence.>> Atlee had expressed fears regarding the rage of SubhashChandra Bose'sIndian National Army as a reason for its decision to give usindependence;another reason was that World War II had liquidated the BritishEmpire andleft it to ration even eggs to the citizens of England. But GandhidislikedBose's guts and gumption and Nehru sent the officers of the valiantINA to asecret trial in the Red Fort.>> Thus, even as the Congress of Gandhiand Nehru, his pampered disciple,ahimsa, non-violence, became the motto ofour motherland. So bad has thisbecome over the last 60 years that today evenkilling a stray dog on thestreet, however vicious and sick, has become acrime, courtesy anotherGandhi, Maneka by name.>> Take the more serious issueof terrorism. Excepting during the Khalistanuprising in the eighties thatwas ultimately doused by K.P.S. Gill and hisbrave police force, ourcountry's approach to terrorism has all along beentepid and timid, castratedand impotent.>> Because almost all the terrorist acts in recent years haveinvolvedMuslims as the perpetrators, and because of the C ongress fetishofappeasing the minority Muslim community at any cost, our softnationalpsyche inherited from Gandhi, our response to terrorism has becomeacombination of impotence and vote bank politics sought to be coveredbyrhetoric and pleas for peace.>> At every stage of our every "encounter"with a terrorist act, ourcollective national response has been reactiverather than active, defensiverather than offensive. Public statements areissued, action is promised.Period. Nothing else really happens.>> At thebase of it all is the shameful fact that we choose to be confusedbyterrorism. We are not sure whether to treat it as a law and order problemoras an act of war against the nation. Our elite journalists of the printandTV/radio world are not even sure as to whether to describe those whoindulgein an act of terror as "militants" or "terrorists" .>> Politicians are, orchoose to be, equally confused in this simple matter.>> Yes, it is a simplematter because the English dictionary will tell youthat a militant is onewho confronts, face to face, not one who wears amask; and this militant doesnot wield an AK 47 or throws hand grenades ordetonates a bomb with remotecontrol mechanism.>> Further, we have had the phrase "terrorism act" welldefined in one of ourConstitutional documents right from 1985.>> Called "TheConstitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order", itempoweredParliament to enact any law to prevent "terrorist acts" and wenton to define"terrorist act" as "any act or thing by using bombs, dynamiteor otherexplosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or otherlethalweapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or anyothersubstances (whether biological or otherwise) of a hazardous nature."Bycorollary, the perpetrator of a "terrorist act" is a "terrorist If yougetyour concepts right; the right action will follow --- provided you loveyourcountry more than your political party or your own advancement inpoliticalcircles.>> Tragically, that hasn't happened in our country so farand is unlikely toever happen till, heaven forbid, a colossal andunbelievable act of terrorparalyses the entire country into a daze.>> Justrecall some events of recent years. The UPA government that came in2004quickly repealed the Prevention of Terrorist Act (POTA) whichtheVajpayee-led NDA government had introduced after the ghastly attackinDecember 2001.>> It was not withdrawn because of its stringent featuresbut because it wasallegedly misused against the minorities (read Muslims).The basic fact wasthat the Congress, which heads the UPA sarkar, wanted toappease and winover the Muslims with one more lollipop.>> Amusingly enough,any call by the BJP for the re-introduction of POTA orsome such tough law iscounterattacked by the Congress. "Did your POTAprevent the attack on theAkshardh am Temple?" they ask.>> Forgotten in this child-like question isthat it was POTA that secured theconviction of Afzal Guru. Forgotten is thatthe acceptance of a confessionto the police as evidence (considered adraconian legal provision) was whatled to the conviction under TADA of RajivGandhi's assassins.>> In several other areas as well, our successivegovernments have failed toact in ways so crucial to minimize, if not totallystop, the reign of terrorthat now occurs so frequently that from a tragedyit has become a joke forthe cynic.>> Take the policing of our urban areaswhich are the focal points ofterrorism. Lt General Sinha recently disclosedthat in the last sixty yearsafter Independence the number of police stationsin the country hasincreased by a laughable 15 per cent over the figure of12,000 that existedthen.>> In contrast, he says, our population hasincreased four times in that sameperiod even as policing has become so muchmore complex than before.>> Further, whatever police force available isoverworked but underpaid,apart from being manipulated and exploited by theirpolitical bosses. Thatis why, at least Mumbai's policemen, and policewomen ,look so unfit, almostobese, and so blank in face.>> Ditto with ourIntelligence force. Marginal increase in their strength hasoccurred, butassignments include assessment of likely performance of therulin g party inthe coming elections. And why the National Security Advisorshould have beeninvolved so much in the Indo-US nuclear deal as he actuallywas is amystery.>> Then there's the human rights industry and our politicians'concern for itmuch beyond national interest. And there's that impracticalconcern for"guilty beyond reasonable doubt" even in matters of terrorism.Ifroaches had votes and rats had a religion, our politicians would enactalaw prohibiting killing of those two living species as well.>> Imagine thePeople's Democratic Party of Jammu & Kashmir granting pensionsfromgovernment to families of slain terrorists. Imagine, the PrimeMinisterhimself disclosing his sleepless night over the plight of the motherof anIndian Muslim held in police custody in Australia on suspicion ofbeinginvolved in a bomb blast but not over the plight of mothers ofthousands ofhis innocent countrymen killed in terrorist violence.>> Imaginetwo Cabinet Ministers oppose the ban on SIMI despite the latter'sprovenguilt. Imagine one Cabinet Minister wanting all illegal migrantsfromBangladesh to be given full citizenship rights, when it is well-knownthatmany among them have links with terrorists. Imagine another CabinetMinisterapproving of a University vice chancellor's decision to deployfundsprovided by a foreign government to be utilized for the legal defenceof twoof his University s tudents accused of involvement in terroristviolence.>> Imagine, lastly, that amounts running into thousands of croreshave beenspent on the Haj subsidy for Muslims but the security of our verylongcoastline on the west is so ill-funded that terrorists can come fromKarachiacross the Arabian Sea to Mumbai without being spotted.>> Contrastall of this is typically indolent-cum- idealistic- cum-selfishIndianattitude to the stark realism and patriotism of the USA when 9/11occurred in2001. One thing that nation did shortly after that dastardly daywas theenactment by the USA Congress of what's come to be known as the USAPatriotAct. That nomenclature is really an acronym, and the full name ofthatlegislation is "Uniting and Strengthening America by ProvidingAppropriateTools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001".If a namecan arouse emotions, that one certainly does. And howeverdraconian that lawhas been, it has prevented the recurrence of 9/11.>> Unless the whole youngnation of ours forgets non-violence as a magicmantra and unless ourpoliticians show a commitment similar to that of theUSA to engage in aliteral war against terror, we shall continue to allowjust about a dozen-oddterrorists to humiliate an entire nation for over 48hours, even as a naïvePrime Minister calls the Pakistan chief ofintelligence to share info withus. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
