Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
India Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: pakistan army better than indian army!!
G3A3 7.62mm    4/9/2005 6:53:23 PM
Their is no comparsion between india and pakistan. Pakistan army is more modernize than the indian army. paks also have better weaponry and traning. So what if the indian army is bigger in numbers pakstan has fought 3 wars with india pak won 2 of the 3 wars if my sources are correct. Indian army general say they can take over pakistan in a couple of weeks they tried it in 1965 and failed they will fail again. Pakistan army has quailty indian army has quainty. Any comments my indian buddy's
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7   NEXT
G3A3 7.62mm    RE:pakistan army better than indian army!!   4/10/2005 8:35:33 PM
Yes swordfish I can elaborate on that the pakistani tanks Al Khalid can shoot the indian tanks from 3 miles away the indian tanks dont have that kind of range. Also Al khalid MBT has night vision and thermal vision that its crew can use at night and also the Alkhalid does not need a person to reload the gun after each round the gun reloads automaticly which makes firing the gun faster. Also the guns the paks use the G3A3 is better than the indian weapons the g3 has a 7.62mm nato round which is bigger than the indian 5.56mm Nato round and the 7.62mm round also inflicts bigger wounds and can also go longer distances than the 5.56mm round. IN kargil the indians were using FAL a aussualt rifle 5.56mm round while the paks were using G3A3 7.62mm the paks digged and waited for the indians to come they also digged out of the range of the Fals which is about 30 yards and did not worry of being hit by the inacurrate indian weapons and took down the indians easily with the G3 which has longer range. One more thing the Fal is just another copy of the ak47. The only difference is that it is chambered fo the Nato 5.56mm round and has a 20round magzine. Other than that it is another AK47. THose are just some of the reasons how the paks have superior weaponery than the indians.
 
Quote    Reply

Jodhpur    For G3A3---REGARDING KARGIL (some facts)   4/11/2005 12:02:20 AM
G3A3 says: "IN kargil the indians were using FAL a aussualt rifle 5.56mm round while the paks were using G3A3 7.62mm the paks digged and waited for the indians to come they also digged out of the range of the Fals which is about 30 yards and did not worry of being hit by the inacurrate indian weapons and took down the indians easily with the G3 which has longer range." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) First of all, the new assault rifle is called the INSAS not the FAL. (The FN FAL produced under license from Belgium chambers the 7.62mm round.) IN FACT, most indian troops had Ak-series assault rifles w/ 7.62mm rounds during the kargil war, not INSAS- I believe only a few regiments like RajRifs had INSAS. In the situation you describe, the intruders would be engaged with medium machine guns & SAWs- both of which are 7.62mm. So much for your fairy tale. The main advantage the pakistanis had was that they were bunkered and firing from commanding heights. 2) The “Al-Khalid” (or MBT 2000) you mention is a JV between China, Pakistan and Ukraine. The diesel engine is Ukrainian. The overall design is an upgrade of a T-90 variant by Norinco- a Chinese defense contractor. Initial models were produced by China- not Pakistan. So it’s “Pakistani” origin is arguable. ---> By the way, regarding the Pakistanis in Kargil, they were kitted with Chinese Ak variants NOT G3. This was in accordance with the Pakistani claim that they were indigenous “freedom fighters” from the Valley.
 
Quote    Reply

takeiteasy    RE:pakistan army better than indian army!!   4/11/2005 3:42:08 AM
Pakistani military is the only stronge institution in PK, It doesn't have any independent democratic institutions. It doesn't have any huge economic power houses. If u really want to see stronger pakistan u need devolope these stronge institutes. No noble price for pakistan (india has 6) no pk company in forbes list of big industries. no democrasy in PK breeding ground for terrorism
 
Quote    Reply

PeregrinePike    With a name like G3A3... a kid tries to talk of modernization - LOL!!!   4/11/2005 8:39:41 AM
Hmmmm.... .... let me see The Pakis dont have G3A3's first of all! HK wouldnt sell them the licence to build it directly.... so the Pakis had to beg fellow dictator Franco for the Spanish CETME design. And since G3, world has seen G33's and now G36's... and only G36 is comparable to the versatility of the INSAS with the possible exception of 2 more HK models S80 and the new M-8's... Pretty advanced thinking for a 3rd world Country, eh? What an oxymoron!
 
Quote    Reply

Sunny    RE:pakistan army better than indian army!!   4/11/2005 4:45:46 PM
G3A3 7.62mm DOESN'T MATTER.....WE STILL WON!!
 
Quote    Reply

shiz       12/28/2008 2:20:25 PM
Hey ''Sunny'' i think you have a serious problem you dont even no that your country lost all the wars very badly and your saing they won all three. if INDIA was on a war with bangladesh or Nepal then maybe they had a chance but against pakistan no chance. the nuclear weapons of pakistan are ten times better then the old indian weapons. India is a funny country even if ther is a small accident in india the mental authorites blame pakistan
 
Quote    Reply

strat-T21C       2/17/2009 1:07:15 PM
If you are soo good, then why can;t you control your own boarders? Is your "army" so inept that it is afraid of some tribe of illiterate boogie men? If you could do that then NATO fcs wouldn't have to cross into Pakistan to get them for you.
 
Quote    Reply

great india    G3A3 7.62mm   2/22/2009 2:42:56 PM
hello my friend please wake from the dream as whole world knows that 90000 pakistani military surrender to india in 1965 and formation of bangaladesh were taken place i would also like to tell you that every time when pakistan attacked india in any form it has tasted the soil.weather it is 1965,1971,or kargil. india has never attacked any country and it will no do so in near future. but this dosent mean that we are coward. your existance is just because of our gracefull nature if we were liked you your existanced had been diminished long before so be thanks full to us. and also remember one thing that however long the testies become it will always remaine under the pennis. so my small brother its last warning that behaved yours self or we will get forced to teach you a manner
 
Quote    Reply

raosaab    USA TO FOOL   2/28/2009 8:45:36 AM
hi i would say physical strength  wise both countries are neck to neck cause they are the same breed some 1000 years ago they were either  hindus or buddhist  .Islam  came in much later.They have muslim jatts muslim gujjars and muslim rajputs punjabi muslims and  pathans and many other muslims races ( i can see the same races in indian army too) .However during  indo - pak wars they get huge favours from Iran, Saudi Arabia ,Usa and China. Like iran helped them in may indo pak wars by providing free fuel to pakistani air force jets Usa China gives offers them with fighter planes, so pakistani army gets lot of moral support.Also they get active help from local terrorist groups which are in millions in pakistan called as mujahidins.Currently Pakistan has upgraded its Armed forces as it gets  billions of dollars free of cost from usa, which America thinks Pakistan is using them to fight home grown terrorism and yes you get it right they are buying fighter jets ,tanks and missiles from usa , which usa don't mind as paksitan army is shopping from thier money to buy their goods. However Indian army got help from USSR in earlier days and no one else  to help them except their own will and pride in serving for their motherland.Now a days as israel and usa is facing the same problem of islamic terror so they feel they should help india, which they are doing so I would say Pakistani army fights to kill more Hindus  so their zeal is more during wars no doubt however Indian army is mature and very professional  they fight for their mother land so their zeal is bit less.As per my research.
 
Quote    Reply

RP       4/30/2009 10:25:53 AM

 

See you may have all those superior weapons received from USA in any of the aids you have been getting. Which I do not think is the case. But remember only one thing ?WE ARE THE BEST AND WE LOVE OUR MOTHERE LAND FROM DEEP OF OUR HEART AND CAN FIGHT WITH ANY ONE FOR HER?

 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics