Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
China Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: covert operations of CIA
sci    8/14/2007 9:21:18 AM
"http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6530" "Democratic Imperialism": Tibet, China, and the National Endowment for Democracy By Michael Barker Global Research, August 13, 2007 People familiar with Asian history will be aware that during Tibet?s popular uprising against their Chinese occupiers in 1959, his Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama (then aged 23), escaped from his homeland of Tibet to live in exile in India. Subsequently, the Dalai Lama formed a Tibetan government-in-exile, and to this day the Dalai Lama and his government remain in exile. The Dalai Lama?s tireless efforts to draw international attention to the Tibetan cause received a welcome boost in 1989 when he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, and since then the Dalai Lama has been able to demand sustained media attention (globally) to his ongoing non-violent struggle for a free Tibet. This part of Tibetan history is fairly uncontroversial, but a part of Tibet?s story that less people will be familiar with is Tibet?s historical links to the US?s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Indeed, as Carole McGranahan (2006) notes ?[t]he case of Tibet presents a mostly unexplored example of covert Cold War military intervention.?[1] While in recent years far more information has been made available concerning the CIA?s violent linkages with Tibetan forces, to date only one article has examined the connection between Tibet?s current independence campaigners and an organization that maintains close ties with the CIA, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). A Brief History of CIA-Tibetan Relations In 1951, the Chinese People?s Liberation Army entered Lhasa (Tibet?s capital) and proceeded to force the Dalai Lama?s government to sign a ?Plan for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet?, which effectively ratified the Chinese occupation of Tibet. This action combined with the ensuing Chinese repression of Tibetan activists subsequently inspired a popular revolution, which owing to its anticommunist orientation drew upon strong support from the CIA.[2] As Jim Mann (1999) notes, ?during the 1950s and 60s, the CIA actively backed the Tibetan cause with arms, military training, money, air support and all sorts of other help.?[3] Furthermore, as Michael Parenti (2004) has observed at the same time: ?? in the United States, the American Society for a Free Asia, a CIA front, energetically publicized the cause of Tibetan resistance, with the Dalai Lama?s eldest brother, Thubtan Norbu, playing an active role in that group. The Dalai Lama?s second-eldest brother, Gyalo Thondup, established an intelligence operation with the CIA in 1951 [although CIA aid was only formally established in 1956]. He later upgraded it into a CIA-trained guerrilla unit whose recruits parachuted back into Tibet.?[4] Indeed, according to formerly secret US intelligence documents (released in the late 1990s), it turned out that ?[f]or much of the 1960s, the CIA provided the Tibetan exile movement with $1.7 million a year for operations against China, including an annual subsidy of $180,000 for the Dalai Lama?.[5] By 1969, however, it appears that covert support for the Tibetan cause had either served its geopolitical purpose (or it was decided that these operations were simply no longer effective), and the CIA announced the withdrawal of its aid for the Tibetan revolutionaries. That said, support for the Tibetan freedom fighters was still provided by the Indian and Taiwanese governments ?until 1974, two years after President Richard Nixon normalized U.S. relations with China? (as were the U.S. subsidies for the Dalai Lama, which also continued until 1974): however, thereafter ? especially once the Dalai Lama urged the fighters to put down their weapons ? the violent resistance collapsed and the ?CIA quietly paid to resettle the survivors?.[6] With the apparent end of CIA operations in Tibet, John Kraus (2003) observes that although: ??President Ford ended the U.S. government?s involvement with Tibet as part of its Cold War strategy. The next phase of the U.S. relationship with the Dalai Lama and his people was to be cast in terms of a contest between human rights and political engagement with China.?[7] Thus Kraus adds that in 1979 the Dalai Lama was ?finally granted a visa by President Jimmy Carter? to visit the United States? and the ?Tibetan cause then found new sponsors in a bipartisan group of senators, members of Congress, and congressional staff assistants who worked with the Dalai Lama?s entourage to focus the attention of successive U.S. administrations and a responsive world community on the Tibet situation?. As this article will demonstrate, a large part of this freedom work is presently being actively supported by the NED, so the following section will now examine this organization and it anti-democratic history. ...
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

sci    The CIA's secret war in tibet    8/14/2007 9:27:15 AM
"http://www.timbomb.net/buddha/archive/msg00087.html"
 
--------------------------------------------------
The CIA's secret war in tibet  (ST)
--------------------------------------------------

Seattle Times
January 26, 1997
By Paul Salopek

Parts: 1 Dateline: KATMANDU, Nepal Memo: Three decades later, former
Tibetan guerrillas come forward to discuss  an episode that both the United
States and the Dalai Lama's government-in-exile would prefer to forget.
Their battle lasted nearly 10 years, until the U.S. cut them off. Copyright
Chicago Tribune

THE CIA'S SECRET WAR IN TIBET

The first Americans Nawang Gayltsen ever saw had small, silver eagles
pinned on their caps. Nawang will never forget those eagles. They seemed
auspicious, like totems of victory or success. Today, his face wrinkles
into a sad smile remembering this. The Americans came, he said, in a big
turboprop plane, a gleaming machine that he and other awed Tibetans called
a "sky ship." They wore sunglasses and baggy flight suits. They packed
shiny automatic weapons on their hips. And speaking through an interpreter,
they asked Nawang if he wanted to kill Chinese. "I told them I would be
very happy to kill many Chinese," recalled the 63-year-old rug merchant,
one of thousands of exiled Tibetans living in this picturesque Himalayan
capital. "I was very young and strong then. Very patriotic. I told them I
would even be a suicide bomber." The strangers, Air Force pilots working
with the CIA, must have liked what they heard because on that hot day back
in 1963, at a secret air base in India, they took Nawang and 40 other
Tibetan recruits on the first airplane ride of their lives. It was a
journey that would stretch halfway around the world and into one of the
murkiest chapters of the CIA's long history of covert activity in Asia: a
secret war in Tibet.  Between the late 1950s and the mid-1960s, say Tibetan
veterans such as Nawang and U.S. intelligence experts who corroborate their
stories, the American government flew hundreds of eager Tibetan exiles to
far-flung bases in Okinawa, Guam and even Colorado. There they were trained
as guerrillas against the Chinese troops that had invaded the remote
Buddhist kingdom in 1950. The Tibetans, many recruited from the warrior
Khamba tribe, were parachuted back into their homeland at night with
submachine guns and neck lockets with photos of the Dalai Lama, Tibet's
spiritual leader. Some CIA trainees ended up commanding a Kiplingesque army
of 2,000 resistance fighters dubbed the Chusi Gangdruk, or "Four Rivers,
Six Gorges."

Their specialty was ambushing the People's Liberation Army from bases high
in the cloud-colored mountains of Nepal.  Others floated down through the
moonlit skies of central Asia never to be heard from again: At least 40
were presumed captured by the Chinese and executed by a pistol-shot in the
back of the head.  Today, this obscure Cold War skirmish in a high, lonely
place many Americans associate with Shangri-La is a tale that both the CIA
and the Dalai Lama's pacifist government-in-exile would prefer to forget.
After all, China's grip on Tibet remains stronger than ever.  Yet at a time
when the Dalai Lama's non-violent campaign for independence has captured
the attention of Hollywood--where Walt Disney and Tri-Star are producing
elegiac hymns to "lost Tibet" and Richard Gere and fellow actors champion
the mountain land's cause--the Tibetan foot soldiers of that quixotic war
are beginning to break their decades-old vow of silence to the CIA. Most of
the ex-guerrillas are grandfathers now. They run carpet factories in
Katmandu or tend dusty farms in the foothills of western Nepal.

They admit that going public about their American connections is as much a
sign of growing frustration with Tibet's languishing drive for freedom as
it is a reckoning with mortality. For many, speaking out seemed a final act
of resistance. "We are old, and we will be gone soon," explained Nawang,
who says he was taught to blow up bridges by CIA instructors at Camp Hale,
a now-abandoned Army base near Vail, Colo. "People should know that men
died for this. These things are no longer secrets. They stopped being
secrets when we lost."  Truth be told, little about the CIA's skullduggery
in the Himalayas is a real secret anymore--except maybe to the U.S.
taxpayers who bankrolled it.  Within the close-knit Tibetan exile
communities in Nepal and India, the exploits of the Khambas and their CIA
patrons have become a folk legend, albeit one retold grudgingly, with an
awkward mixture of pride and bitterness. In the U.S. meanwhile, the
insurgency has received at least fleeting treatment in books about the Cold
War.  "The real
 
Quote    Reply

displacedjim       8/14/2007 10:55:03 AM
Thanks for posting those articles.  I had no idea CIA give a little bit of support to some Tibetans.  It's reassuring to know that the CIA actually managed to help the good guys on occasion, even if it was only a small amount that had no real chance for attaining liberty for the Tibetans from the vile scum Chinese Communists.
 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan       8/14/2007 12:41:55 PM
Ford may have formally ended CIA support, but Kissenger killed financial support as a pre-condition of Nixon's visit to Beijing.

But CIA for support of Tibetan is a good thing.  I would hope that India also provides support for them as well.
China's fall is Tibet's salvation.

 
Quote    Reply

FJV    Tibet   8/15/2007 2:36:58 PM
For what it's worth, I've read an article in Dutch about the way Tibet was ran before the Chinese took over. Needless to say that it wasn't pretty. Tibet might not have been a decent democracy to begin with.



 
Quote    Reply

sci    myth of tibet history   8/15/2007 6:24:59 PM
FJV
 
Here is another book free online:
 
" target="_blank">link

The Shadow of the Dalai Lama – Introduction

© Victor & Victoria Trimondi 

INTRODUCTION

 Light and Shadow

 

For centuries after Buddha had died,

his shadow was still visible in a cave

a dreadful, spine-chilling shadow.

 God is dead: but man being the way

 he is for centuries to come there

 will be caves in which his shadow is shown

 and we, we must also triumph over his shadow.

Friedrich Nietzsche

 

The practice and philosophy of Buddhism has spread so rapidly throughout the Western world in the past 30 years and has so often been a topic in the media that by now anybody who is interested in cultural affairs has formed some sort of concept of Buddhism. In the conventional “Western” notion of Buddhism, the teachings of Buddha Gautama are regarded as a positive Eastern countermodel to the decadent civilization and culture of the West: where the Western world has introduced war and exploitation into world history, Buddhism stands for peace and freedom; whilst Western rationalism is destructive of life and the environment, the Eastern teachings of wisdom preserve and safeguard them. The meditation, compassion, composure, understanding, nonviolence, modesty, and spirituality of Asia stand in contrast to the actionism, egomania, unrest, indoctrination, violence, arrogance, and materialism of Europe and North America. Ex oriente lux?“light comes from the East”; in occidente nox?“darkness prevails in the West”.

 

We regard this juxtaposition of the Eastern and Western hemispheres as not just the “business” of naive believers and zealous Tibetan lamas. On the contrary, this comparison of values has become distributed among Western intelligentsia as a popular philosophical speculation in which they flirt with their own demise.

 

But the cream of Hollywood also gladly and openly confess their allegiance to the teachings of Buddhism (or what they understand these to be), especially when these come from the mouths of Tibetan lamas. “Tibet is looming larger than ever on the show business map,” the Herald Tribune wrote in 1997. “Tibet is going to enter the Western popular culture as something can only when Hollywood does the entertainment injection into the world system. Let’s remember that Hollywood is the most powerful force in the world, besides the US military” (Herald Tribune, March 20, 1997, pp. 1, 6). Orville Schell, who is working on a book on Tibet and the West, sees the Dalai Lama’s “Hollywood connection” as a substitute for the non-existent diplomatic corps that could represent the interests of the exiled Tibetan hierarch: “Since he [the Dalai Lama] doesn’t have embassies, and he has no political power, he has to seek other kinds. Hollywood is a kind of country in his own, and he’s established a kind of embassy there.” (Newsweek, May 19, 1997, p. 24).

...
 
Quote    Reply

sci    myth of tibet history   8/15/2007 6:26:56 PM

link here:

"http://www.trimondi.de/SDLE/Index.htm"
 
 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan       8/15/2007 10:15:25 PM

For what it's worth, I've read an article in Dutch about the way Tibet was ran before the Chinese took over. Needless to say that it wasn't pretty. Tibet might not have been a decent democracy to begin with.




No one said it was, but Tibet was an independent country and is now occupied territory.  Tibet would be better served by Indian influence than by rotten Chinese bosses.
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy