Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
China Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: US capable of defending Taiwan: top US commander
Softwar    7/25/2007 8:54:39 AM
link The United States has the capability to swiftly move military forces to defend Taiwan against a potential attack from China, the top US military commander in the Asia-Pacific region said Tuesday. Admiral Timothy Keating shrugged off suggestions at a Washington forum that the United States, burdened by conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, did not have sufficient forces in the vicinity to respond quickly enough to an incursion on Taiwan by China. "I don't lose sleep at night over our ability to respond to any crisis anywhere, including the Strait of Taiwan," Keating, the commander of the Pacific Command, declared at the forum organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Although the United States has fewer troops in the "area of responsibility" now than about two decades ago, "We are also capable of moving people around fairly quickly," he pointed out. "We have ways of watching developments and doing better analyses -- much better than before. So in the Strait of Taiwan, in particular, we could get a large number of forces there in relatively short order," he said. "The more unambiguous activity we notice and the earlier we make that analysis, obviously the more we can do." Tension along the Strait of Taiwan, which separates the island from mainland China, had increased in recent months with Taiwan's independence-leaning President Chen Shui-bian pushing for a controversial referendum that could draw the wrath of Beijing. Despite persistent pressure from Washington, Chen said he would press ahead with the referendum on whether the island should apply for UN membership under the name Taiwan. China, which regards the island as a renegade province awaiting reunification with the mainland, could see it as a unilateral move to change the island's status, triggering a possible conflict, experts say. Any conflict will drag in the United States, which by law has to help defend Taiwan. Asked whether the situation was getting better or worse along the Strait of Taiwan with China's growing military strength, Keating said Chen's "rhetoric isn't entirely helpful."
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

passto       7/28/2007 5:04:46 AM
Not trying to make a big deal of it, but I've always wondered why articles (such as the above) never mention the Nationalist angle. I fully understand that Nationalist single-party rule is over (which is good), but it is still a piece of history that is intertwined with the Taiwan Strait issues. I guess I am just saying that the Taiwan Strait issue seems to have 3 angles, not 2.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       7/28/2007 11:47:48 AM

Not trying to make a big deal of it, but I've always wondered why articles (such as the above) never mention the Nationalist angle. I fully understand that Nationalist single-party rule is over (which is good), but it is still a piece of history that is intertwined with the Taiwan Strait issues. I guess I am just saying that the Taiwan Strait issue seems to have 3 angles, not 2.


Chiang Kai-shek died, and hie son also died. That was the KMT all about: basically a personality cult around the leadership. Since the leaders died and the sycophants were unable to assume the position as the leader, they basically broke up into many parties. The KMT today is just the remnant of what CKS and CCK left behind. Almost all political parties in Taiwan seldomly disagree on internal and social issues: they are all national socialists. Most disagreements are about politics and media regulations. You'll find that the only unresolvable political problem in Taiwan is the ambiguous identity. The KMT politicians know very well that they will probably take similar, but not as provocative, approach to the cross straight policy of the DPP. I said here before that the difference of Mainland Policy between KMT is DPP is the difference between screw China and f_ck China, and the goals are just the same: self-preservation.
 
Quote    Reply

EW3       7/28/2007 6:47:36 PM
With all 3 seawolf submarines now homeported in WA and 3 LA class subs now homeported out of Guam and 2 Ohio class subs on the west coast patrolling 300+days/year each, the Chinese have to think twice about what is the waters of the westwern Pacific. 
 
Quote    Reply

Arodihus       7/29/2007 8:56:39 PM
EW3 for President.
Then all these munbo jumbo up in the air nonsense solved in one bold stroke.
EW3 for President.
Go ahead free people of Taiwan, declare independence.
We'll take care of the rest.
Freedom, democracy, liberty.
Go Chen go, declare independence.


 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy