Did they ask Boeing or MD anything?

ROFLLMAO, your source is Fraklin Lamb? The fake prof at Northwestern and fake pHD from LSE

MWAAAAAAARF

Herald , you keep having it wrong :

""They have gates or doors at the inlets that louvre, or regulate the air flow rate, incompetent. Hence DOORS. ""

 

No , no and no . They don 't regulate anything , I repeat they have nothing to do with the engines airflow . They open automaticaly when the fighter is in full military power or is using AB to keep the heat signature low . Do you understand ?

 

Cheers.

Herald :

""That is what I said, you INCOMPETENT. Damn can't you READ or even THINK? ""

 

Ah ? Ok , I misunderstood what you were saying . I apologize . 

The system works differenly than the one on the F-22 but the result is slightly better because it is not only cool air bypassing the hot chamber but the cold air is also used to cool down the airframe from the inside .

The system on the F-22 is simpler :

 

http://i39.tinypic.com/2i9lg29.gif" /> 

 

Cheers .

Herald :

""I GAVE you everything you needed to understand what I said-INCLUDING DIAGRAMS AND NOMENCLATURE before you contradicted me TWO times this thread. ""

 

You gave me nothing relevant , nothing . Something was lost in the translation and I apologized for it . Refusing my apologies is your right and I note that forgiveness is something unlnown to you Herald . 

Furthermore , being a GoogleMan doesn 't help you since you keep posting irrelevant links . I am sure that you don 't undertand half of what you read anyway ...

A bit like the small US study on delta-canard you gave to Shooter . Nothing relevant in it and the paper shows how little understanding some US engineers have on the matter , sorry to say . The USA never liked the delta-canard concept because they did not dig enough into it . While you can design brilliant conventional airframes , you still have a lot to learn on delta-canard .

 

Cheers .

As an example , look at Rafale 's unusual nose shape :

 

http://i40.tinypic.com/5b78g8.jpg" /> 

 

Then , compare it with the Typhoon (or the Gripen) . On the Typhoon , the nose is a simple cylinder with a 70s design and they sticked 2 canards on it , full stop .

On the Rafale , the fluid mecanics are far more advanced and show Dassault 's edge . I posted a litle explanation from Mr

ROFL Hamilcar, i dint know you quoted info from communists lol. Ignacio Ramonet isnt anymore in Le Monde for years btw (saying how your internet source is reliable) and he is close friend to Castro. Pierre Levy is former boss of l'Humanité aka french communist party diary

 

LMAO you are getting more and more pathetic!

 

http://i40.tinypic.com/5b78g8.jpg" /> 

 

Then , compare it with the Typhoon (or the Gripen) . On the Typhoon , the nose is a simple cylinder with a 70s design and they sticked 2 canards on it , full stop .

On the Rafale , the fluid mecanics are far more advanced and show Dassault 's edge . I posted a litle explanation from Mr

""I just choose to regard as you are, and as I showed you to be.""

 

Bla-bla-bla ... As usual when you have nothing relevant to say or to show , you go down to semantics and personal attacks .

You will never changed and this is the reason why you only post here on SP , anywhere else your attitude would give you the sack .

""Look at the radio signal spikes. That is not a clean plane. ""

 

Sheesh , you do have electronic eyes capable to see electromagnetic waves from looking at a picture !?

Then , the Rafale is a discret aircraft and not a VLO platform Herald . Its RCS is lower than most aircraft but it isn 't the F-22 .

Composites , RAM and careful shaping help a lot .

 

Cheers .