Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: US drones hacked by Iraqi insurgents
maruben    12/17/2009 4:01:23 PM
US drones hacked by Iraqi insurgents? Insurgents used software such as Skygrabber to hack drones ? American official says flaw has been identified and fixed Buzz up! Digg it Ewen MacAskill in Washington guardian.co.uk, Thursday 17 December 2009 20.02 GMT Article history Insurgents in Iraq used software such as Skygrabber to hack into American drones. Photograph: Ethan Miller/Getty One of America's most sophisticated weapons in the conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, the unmanned drone, has been successfully hacked by insurgents using software available on the internet for $26 (£16). Insurgents in Iraq have intercepted live video feeds from the drones being relayed back to a US controller and revealing potential targets. A US official said the flaw had been identified and fixed in the last 12 months. The problem only came to light after the US found hours and hours worth of videotaped recordings on militant laptops late last year and earlier this year. The insurgents used software programmes such as Skygrabber, developed by a Russian company, originally intended to download music and videos from the internet. The drones, which cost about $4.5m each, have become one of the most important parts of the US armoury. Their use by the US military has increased 600% in the last five years. They are able to hover over suspect locations and missiles can be launched against alleged militants in Iraq and alleged al-Qaida and Taliban members in Afghanistan and in the border region of Pakistan. The potential problem with the hacking was that insurgents, if they knew the locations being targeted, would be able to take evasive action. A US source with knowledge of the programme today confirmed the report, first disclosed by the Wall Street Journal, but said that the quality of the pictures seen by the insurgents would have been of limited value. The source said the pictures would have been fuzzy, making it near impossible to determine the location of a target in the deserts or mountains. The US air force is responsible for drones in Iraq and Afghanistan and the CIA for those in Pakistan. The CIA ones are reported to have been encrypted while some of the air force ones have not. The Pentagon had been aware of the problem for at least a decade but assumed the insurgents would not have had the technical knowledge to hack into the drones. The drones, from being a relative novelty at the start of the decade, have become one of the favourite methods of the US military and the CIA in tracking and killing suspected insurgents. Their use in Pakistan is particularly controversial, in part because some Pakistanis see it as US infringement of the country's sovereignty but also because civilians are often hit. Pakistan security officials said that a drone, assumed to be American, fired seven missiles today at a cave complex, a compound and a vehicle, killing 12. Lieutenant Colonel Mark Wright, a Pentagon spokesman, asked about the hacking of drones, indicated the problem had been addressed. He said: "The department of defence constantly evaluates and seeks to improve the performance and security of our various ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] systems and platforms. As we identify shortfalls, we correct them as part of a continuous process of seeking to improve capabilities and security. As a matter of policy, we don't comment on specific vulnerabilities or intelligence issues." The first the US apparently knew about the hacking was last year when they found video feeds from a drone on the laptop of a Shia militant allegedly backed by Iran. The US and Britain have both accused Iran for years of interfering in Iraq. More laptops were found in the summer that suggested insurgents sharing the video feeds. While the US is hinting that Iran, with its sophisticated technology, is the explanation, it could simply be that an Iraqi searching for a football game or other broadcast came across the signal.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2
benellim4       12/19/2009 8:24:17 AM
 I suspect that the reporter has had a loss in translation at this point as some of what has been said doesn't gel  I'm assuming rhat he's now merged different reports and extrapolated by association
a secondary feed on this:

 


I've read that report as well. There are also reports that say the USAF is using commercial sats for the video stream. Also remember the Predator is flown from a base in CONUS, so a sat link looks like a must. The only time it is locally controlled is during take-offs and landings, or so I'm told. 

 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/19/2009 3:52:29 PM


I've read that report as well. There are also reports that say the USAF is using commercial sats for the video stream. Also remember the Predator is flown from a base in CONUS, so a sat link looks like a must. The only time it is locally controlled is during take-offs and landings, or so I'm told. 

I have less concern about assets being hacked and being handled, I guess my general state of "twitchyness" is talking a COTS type attitude to fielding something which does play in comms space.
 
e-leaks are ugly irrespective ......
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       12/21/2009 11:27:25 PM
Sounds to me like they can intercept broadcast video from locally operated UAV's and video that is being rebroadcast by satellites to receivers in their area.  They probably cannot intercept video from a UAV being operated from the continental US, but is likely that it could be done by personnel near the receiving point.  We will know if that is true if video's start showing up on YouTube.
 
Still, can you just see this scenario?
<cell phone rings and is picked up> 
<Abdul> Hazim, this Abdul.  What's up?
<Hazim> Just driving some friends (HVP's) to their new digs.  What you doing.
<Abdul> Watching a video feed from an infidel drone.
<Hazim> Anything interesting?
<Abdul> Nah.  They just been following this white van around for an hour as it picks people up.  Wait ... they just launched a missile.  Poor guy, looks like he had a van just like yours.
<Hazim>  <dial tone>
<Abdul>  Hazim?  Hazim!
<Abdul>  Inshallah.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/26/2009 6:22:18 PM
FOCUS ON IRAN

U.S. learns Iran has been intercepting Predator feeds for past year WASHINGTON — U.S. military officials said Iran has acquired or developed systems that could hack the software on advanced U.S. UAVs, including the Predator.

They said Iranian operatives used off-the-shelf software to intercept Predator UAV feeds, which allowed Teheran to monitor U.S. intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations.
A U.S. Predator unmanned drone armed with a missile sets off from its hangar at Bagram air base in Afghanistan in November.   AFP/Bonny Schoonakker ...

"Those kinds of things are subject to listening and exploitation," U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula said.
Deptula, head of the air force's UAV program, said the MQ-1 Predator and other advanced unmanned platforms were employing payloads deemed vulnerable to hackers. He cited a new reconnaissance payload, "Gorgon Stare," designed to enable a UAV to simultaneously relay 10 video feeds.
The Iranian interception of U.S. UAV feeds has taken place for more than a year, officials said. In late 2008, U.S. troops captured an Iranian-backed Shi'ite operative in Iraq whose laptop computer contained files of Predator UAV videos.
Officials said Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has supplied systems to its operatives in Iraq to monitor U.S. UAVs. They said the Iranian-backed operatives, from Hizbullah, Mahdi Army, Special Groups and other Shi'ite militias, were employing the SkyGrabber program to intercept Predator video relays. SkyGrabber, designed in Russia, has been advertised on the Internet for less than $30.
"There is evidence that the same software could be used to intercept communications from our fighter-jets," an official said.
The U.S. military has not ruled out that Iran could relay the same software and techniques to Islamist insurgents in neighboring Afghanistan. Officials have acknowledged that Iran was providing support to Taliban, which has become significantly more effective against NATO forces over the last 18 months.
"I'm especially angry that people at the Pentagon knew this was a vulnerability going back to the 1990s and they didn't do anything," Rep. Jim Langevin, a Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said.
"They didn't think our adversaries would figure it out. So, you've got people from Third World countries who've figured out a way to hack into our systems. That greatly disturbs me."
Officials said the Defense Department ordered the air force and army to examine the vulnerability of UAV reconnaissance payloads to hackers. But they said the development of effective encryption counter-measures could take up to five years.
"Every capability comes with its advantages, disadvantages, benefits as well as potential weaknesses," Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said.


 
Quote    Reply

VelocityVector    Sophisticated My Bottom   12/26/2009 9:06:53 PM

Payload is easy to encrypt with overhead of the same order as RGB and resolution.  We can wrap in further encrypted and stream out of sequence through pipe with very little latency.  The pipe doesn't care.  The current issue is standardizing protocols above the lowest common denominator and not the unavailability of suitable encryption technologies; pipe often counts but that's merely a prioritization question.  CIA does not suffer this problem, note please.  Harmony.  Back to your regular holiday programming and 0.02 for all...

v^2

 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       12/27/2009 9:08:15 PM
Had it coming.
 
While I am a great believer in military intelligence and wisdom this is a prime example of military stupidity and foolishness.
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy