Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: 6*F-22 vs 6*Typhoon vs 6*Rafale in the UAE?!
giblets    11/16/2009 4:48:58 AM
According to both Flight Global, and Defence News, other than attending the Dubai airshow, the USAF, RAF, and FAF each sent 6 of their finest fighter aircraft to the desert Kingdom to take part in multinational exercises. Other than adding much fuel to the fire for forum members here! It raises many questions (such as why the USAF was unable to send 1 F-22 to Paris, and can now send 6 to the UAE, despite no drop in operational tempo). And will the F22 and Typhoon not be in the air at the same time again?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Das Kardinal       12/15/2009 1:45:43 AM

"F35 Trap"

 

 

BW, whether or not you believe wholeheartedly in your own opinions you should accept that generally speaking educated consensus is against you here - there's many amateurs talking about the shortcomings of the F35 even though it is an absolute fact that very few of its "stats" are in the public domain, and the ones that are are those that have been the same since the beginning of the awarding of the contract to LM. 

 

The F35 is going to open up a new dimension (a new era) in air warfare - the first widely produced stealthy strike aircraft, which is in every sense designed to counter the.. vintage viewpoint of A2A/A2G aircraft as being highly manauverable agile birds who win dogfights with amazing agility and superb pilotage - in fact, the F35 is designed to fight in an entirely different way, utilizing sensor fusion, stealth, and the most advanced EW suite ever developed. It's a new era, the rafale is a "never was", a plane that enthusiasts will talk about in future as being fantastic even though it will likely never actually see combat or be produced in quantity or even be exported to a 3rd world country worthy of consideration, the F35's capabilities are ABSOLUTELY unknown to you, you have absolutely no source, no "friend" no access whatsoever other than a fanboy understanding in order to quantify its performance.


 

And I state this here knowing that search engines will pick this page up long after both I, and the F35 are old news -it's a revolution in air-warfare, possibly the last major manned fighter program (though I say that with skepticism) but in every way you quantify the factors that determine how a2a engagements pan out, it is an entire generation ahead of the rafale. 

 

There is no F35 trap, it's currently exceeded EVERY single performance guideline that it has been given (even the malreported FCS rubbish that made SP a while back) which is why every major "allied" airforce will adopt it sooner or later, Japan included.


 

There is NOTHING in the sky except an F22 that has the upper hand vs the F35, and nothing for the forseeable future.



Well, this sounds all well and good, but I'm afraid that for now the F35 is a prototype plane years away from IOC. Sure, it may well end up living to its promises (it better do, at the price) but right now all those awesome abilities exist mostly in PR material or in the "it's secret but I'm alluding to it so I can look smart" realm.
In contrast, the F22 has been flying for years now in the USAF and (admittedly, a portion) of its capabilities have filtered down to the public level. You're saying that FS doesn't know anything about the F35, doesn't have access to "insider" information... If you have anything better, please enlighten us. We're all aviation enthusiasts here and we'd love to hear more. Of course, you'll need to reference your sources. I'm afraid just saying "trust me, I know..." or "it's secret, so I can't tell you !" would be disappointingly lame. 
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/15/2009 2:26:17 AM
 never ceases to amaze me how people will get excited over the F-22 but seem to think that the manufacturer didn't pick up any lessons learned when they designed the JSF.
 
ironically, despite the fact that its systems have none of the design problems of the F-22, that it was designed for a different role, and yet gets compared as much as possible when it suits.
 
at a through life support level the JSF is already miles ahead of the F-22, and yet we have all these groans and moans because the aircraft is somehow deficient.  its had far more systems testing done on mules and simmed than any other modern aircraft and yet we see people who are still wedded to the same design scenarios that NG moved away from with the Virginias (after learning from the Seawolfs) and with LM who learned pretty damn quickly what not to repeat from the F-22
 
aparently they were competent enough to make the F-22 but technically asleep at the wheel when building a later iteration of various tech in the F-22 into a plane that already has more partners invested in it than any other non US platform.  The only one that gets close is the Tiffy
 
go figure
 
Quote    Reply

mabie       12/15/2009 4:12:41 AM

 never ceases to amaze me how people will get excited over the F-22 but seem to think that the manufacturer didn't pick up any lessons learned when they designed the JSF.

 

ironically, despite the fact that its systems have none of the design problems of the F-22, that it was designed for a different role, and yet gets compared as much as possible when it suits.

 

at a through life support level the JSF is already miles ahead of the F-22, and yet we have all these groans and moans because the aircraft is somehow deficient.  its had far more systems testing done on mules and simmed than any other modern aircraft and yet we see people who are still wedded to the same design scenarios that NG moved away from with the Virginias (after learning from the Seawolfs) and with LM who learned pretty damn quickly what not to repeat from the F-22


 

aparently they were competent enough to make the F-22 but technically asleep at the wheel when building a later iteration of various tech in the F-22 into a plane that already has more partners invested in it than any other non US platform.  The only one that gets close is the Tiffy


 

go figure

Be grateful the Boeing JSF entry lost.. the whining would be be even worse..



 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/15/2009 4:30:55 AM

Be grateful the Boeing JSF entry lost.. the whining would be be even worse..
I just want to poke my eyes out when I see that abomination.  It makes a lysander look like the concorde
 
Quote    Reply

StobieWan       12/15/2009 8:43:37 AM

God NO! That aircraft was so ugly I don't think it so much flew as was rejected by the earth. 

Ian




>>I just want to poke my eyes out when I see that abomination.  It makes a lysander look like the concorde >>



 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo    Chacun a son gout   12/15/2009 12:26:21 PM
I literally don't know what you people are on about, slagging the X-32 for its looks..
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       12/15/2009 3:03:50 PM
Wow ! So much has been said in one single day ...
 
I 'm just back from work and WHACK !
Since I ' ve said that I was going to change "how I see things" and how to respond with a "more open mind" , I must be carefull .
Well ... Can I after all the garbage I just read ? I am going to try my best .
gf :
""The F35 is going to open up a new dimension (a new era) in air warfare""
 
No . The F-35 is the continuation of a stealth approach .
I buy a B-2 over a F-35 anyday . My "F-35 folder" is rather big and I know my bit about the Jet . I tell you what get 's me "wet" , the DASS and that 's it . The rest of the aircraft ~on paper~ is medium to good with the radar being excellent .
The F-35 is not opening or going to open anything .
 
""There is NOTHING in the sky except an F22 that has the upper hand vs the F35""
 
The F-35 is a prototype and no one knows how it will perform . What you just said in an opinion , nothing more .
 
Nichevo :
""Tell me, FS, BW...if we would sell YOU the F-22...would you buy it?  Why?  How many?""
 
Same response than FS : No . But I 'll buy ONE , just to see if something on it is interesting and can be upgraded .
 
""Would you be interested in buying the F-35?  Why?  How many? ""

No . We don 't need it and we don 't want it , period .
But I 'll buy one to see if something on it is interesting and can be upgraded .
Nichevo , what France needs is rarely technology but more often money . If you are a bit aware on civilian technologies , like Satelites , nuclear , acoustics , Coms , medicine , physics , softwares , rockets , etc , you can only agree that France has an enormous brain power for a 70 millions souls Nation . I said years ago here on StrategyPage that given the same budget , we would have produced something similar to the YF-23 and faster . This is my opinion .
 
gf (to FS) :
""you can't be serious.""
 
He is gf . 
What is striking me , Dear Ozzie , is the fact that you suppose to know few strings but you leave them aside because it is disturbing to you . Btw , this is one of the reasons I stopped to see you as a brilliant poster .
A Company walking over another Company and ending up buying it is a daily fact , gf , you know it for cry out loud !
What do you think Renault or PSA is trying to do in the car market ?! Also , few years ago Airbus was inexistant and now they own 50% of the airliner market ! Do you want some more examples gf ?
Yes , the USA are trying to run down Dassault and then the other European Avionists .
 
It is perfectly normal !
 
Then , when I see some American flagwaving posters screaming "Lies !!!" , it makes me smile ...
 
Cheers .
 

 

 
 
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       12/15/2009 3:21:00 PM
Well, I guess a smile is good for the soul, BW.  When I see you and FS frantically waving the tricolor screaming "WE'RE BETTER THAN YOU! WE ARE! BELIEVE US!" it just makes me groan and reach for the ibuprofen.
 
France is a wonderful country with a great deal of smart people...just like a lot of other countries, including the US.  The difference is, we don't whine about it when the rest of the world doesn't dance to our tune.  (Well, usually.)  The French on the other hand, just can't seem to get over Waterloo...
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       12/15/2009 3:26:43 PM
Oh , Come on sentinel !
You push it too far when you say :
""WE'RE BETTER THAN YOU! WE ARE! BELIEVE US!""
 
My response : in some ways , yes . But I am not talking technology here ...
 
""France is a wonderful country with a great deal of smart people...just like a lot of other countries, including the US.""

Yes .
The rest of your post is simply uncalled for . No bad intended .
 
Cheers .
 
Quote    Reply

Hamilcar       12/15/2009 4:00:27 PM

Well, I guess a smile is good for the soul, BW.  When I see you and FS frantically waving the tricolor screaming "WE'RE BETTER THAN YOU! WE ARE! BELIEVE US!" it just makes me groan and reach for the ibuprofen.

 

France is a wonderful country with a great deal of smart people...just like a lot of other countries, including the US.  The difference is, we don't whine about it when the rest of the world doesn't dance to our tune.  (Well, usually.)  The French on the other hand, just can't seem to get over Waterloo...

 

 

Unfortunately France also contains fanboys and superpatriots who haven't got a clue, like every country does too.
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy