Admins of the site , I must bring to your attention what the poster known as Beazz wrote .

I quote :

 

What a little twit you are BW lol Legal issues? You French are even bigger little whiney babys then I ever gave you credit for. As well as t-total idiots. I double dog dare ya to try anything legal over anything I say or said. Go ahead hero, make my dare. I dare ya!!!

And btw, you think anyone here cares to read your non stop dribble? I to call on sysops to take action against you lol You waste bandwidth the rest of the world could be useing for real internet use. Now crawl back in your little hole you pathetic little teeage twit!! It's ok, you have my permission to go tell mommy this mean old American called you a twit before you start crying to.

 

beazz

Note to BW and SYSOPS:

 

Could someone/anyone do me a favor and list all the possible ways the aggressors *COULD* have seen the missiles coming?  I can only think of the following two possibilites, neither of which is something that I would bet the aggressor aircraft are necessarily equipped to make use of in these scenarios (although both may well be theoretically possible to do if the aggressor aircraft are properly equipped), neither of which I would bet is necessarily done by the firing aircraft during exercises like RED FLAG, and the second of which I would bet is not necessarily done by the firing aircraft even in real life except in long range engagements:

That would be a neat trick considering these are virtual missiles that only exist in a computer simulator. 

 

Aircraft in Red Flag don't carry actual ordnance except of course in live fire exercises.  The only things they normally carry are 1) an ACMI pod which is the size/weight of an IR missile, and 2) an inert IR missile if their loadout simulates those.  They have to carry an IR missile because there's no way to simulate an IR lockon otherwise.  Aircraft do not need to carry RF guided missiles, the aircraft's computer and radar are sufficient to simulate those.

Mister Beazz , unless you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs , you cannot have this kind of argumentation .

You are a despicable person . To insult me openly is one thing but it is nothing compared with what you said earlier .

 

You just read my last words to you , ever .

 

Cheers . 

What is going on ? Of course it is virtual missiles !

We 're not going to shoot at each other for real during a DACT training !!?

Are some of you acting in bad faith or you simply didn 't think about what I was talking about ?

When I said (I quote) :

 

Please God Almighty tell me you actually mean that!! Knowing your rep for outright lieing, I simply will not believe it till I see it. But I just had a huge smile reading YOU would never speak to me again. And people say miracles don'r happen anymore!

Where I come from BW, you are what is known as a tattle tale. Here we tell our children to stop tattling and deal with it. Unless of course it is something that could get someone seriously hurt or someone has done something illegal. It's quiet obvious you are one of those people that is not respected and pushed around by everyone in real life so on an internet baord you try and get some respect. Unsuccessully I might add.  I have watched you threaten and constantly be yelling for SYSOP to do your business for you. You are pathetic BW. If I were SYSOP I would be personally insulted by your non stop telling them what is and is not proper and to do something about it. You act as if they don't read everything said on here and are in effect insulting the intelligence of those charged with running these boards. You are a prime example of what a child that had no strong hand in his upbringing turns out to be. At least I hope that's what it is and everyone in France in not like you.

 

Have a pathetic life you pathetic little man.

 

Beazz

 

Uh huh.  How's a MAWS going to see a virtual missile, again?

 

An RWR is not going to give an indication of firing because the firing aircraft's radar emissions do not change when it fires a non-SARH missile.

 

Also, that's a real cool story you're telling there, how do you know what the aggressors did and didn't know?

To be honest Warpig, I never gave it that much thought. But that would be a pretty much realistic way of putting what I said into context. My only difference would be what I consider ligitimate targets and what some others don't. I don't think I have some burning desire to go out and kill babys. But if they are in a place that must be bombed to save American lifes then so be it is my view point. An example would be how we go about taking out safe houses when we find them. We go to great lengths to make sure not so much a as grain of sand touched any house surrounding it. I would go much further then this and EVERY home on every side of the terrorist safe house would be obliterated if I was calling the shots. Those people in those homes MUST see these terrorists coming and going and by NOT reporting it they are in effect aiding the enemy and I got no sympothy for them whatsoever. If their children are killed because of it., their blood is on their hands, NOT ours. That would certainly be more in line with what I actually said and meant.

I forgot I was dealing with a full grown adult tattle tail baby when addressing BW. But lucky for me, he's not going to talk to me anymore ;-)))))))))))))

 

Beazzzzzzzz

Frankly and truthfully, I always suspect you don't know what you're talking about, and I don't say that in an attempt to insult you but in an attempt to show you the result of your lack of discernment during years of bombarding us with pro-Rafale and pro-French posts.  Naturally, when you throw up everything you can find that sounds good, sometimes/many times it is true... but sometimes/many times it (and/or your commentary about it) turns out to be *too* good to be true, and that brings us to the present where I realize I must scrutize everything you post before I can be confident in accepting any content in them as true.

 

Regarding RWRs and MAWS, first of all a MAWS isn't going to detect anything regarding a simulated missile shot at RED FLAG.  Also, I seriously question whether any of the aggressor squadron's aircraft at RED FLAG even have any MAWS sensors mounted on them, for at least the purely economic reason that there's nothing to detect since all the missile shots are simulated.  Second, since these aggressors are simulating current (or possibly near-future) threat aircraft, they would (at least mostly) be simulating RWR equipment like SPO-15 and L-150, which haven't got a prayer of detecting an AESA radars and very possibly not other modern AI radars, either, although I admit I do not know their specific capabilities in this regard.  Thus, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they did not detect Rafale's radar, just as I would not be surprised if they did not detect the radars on Typhoons, F-15s, and F-16s--or at least not in all their various air-to-air modes of operation.  However, I am again not personally knowledgable in this, so I am not sure about it.