Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: F-35 news collection of week
SlowMan    10/26/2009 5:18:30 PM
- Pentagon affirmed the finding of an earlier study that F-35 is two years behind schedule and would cost "billions more". < link > - UK has cut its planned F-35 orders from 138 to 50 citing the "out of control" F-35B cost. Now the second carrier will only field helicopters. - Obama has surrendered on F136 alternate engine program issue and will sign the defense budget bill with it in. < link >
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   NEXT
sinoflex       11/10/2009 3:20:16 AM

Indeed, it work make sense that the RAM is customized for local climes.  Seems to be a major advancement if the RAM is resistant to moisture and other adverse conditions.  This also explains why running sheep don't register on radar speedguns. 



 



Enough bad jokes from me...






Somebody knows his thermodynamics.
Hardly.  Unlike some of our more enthusiastic members here, I do not profess to possess any special insight.  I liken myself more to a broken clock which is right twice a day in  spite of itself.
 
Quote    Reply

Heorot    Back to F-35 news collection of week   11/12/2009 3:11:00 PM

 

The USA's top weapons buyer is considering changes for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter programme, seeking to prevent further delays and cost overruns.

Ashton Carter, deputy undersecretary of defence for acquisition, technology and logistics, plans to immerse himself in the F-35's programmatic details over the next month, the Department of Defense has confirmed.

His review will consider all aspects of the F-35's current plan, including design, manufacture and flight test. Carter specifically singled out the flight-test phase as a potential source of changes during an interview with Defense News.

Last year, a joint estimating team (JET) evaluated the programme and concluded that a further two-year delay and $7 billion cost overrun was possible. A follow-up report still being finalised reportedly warns that the potential cost overrun estimate has more than doubled.

Lockheed officials have argued that the JET conclusions are flawed because they are based on previous fighter acquisitions. The F-35 has access to a new generation of design and simulation tools, they add.

Carter has not set a timeline for determining a new baseline schedule for the programme.

Pentagon officials are in the process of preparing the fiscal year 2011 budget request, which will be submitted to Congress in February.

The F-35, meanwhile, continues to face new flight-test delays. Aircraft BF-1, the first short take-off and vertical landing prototype, remains at Lockheed's facility in Fort Worth, Texas. It is already several weeks late in ferrying the aircraft to Patuxent River, Maryland, where it must complete its first transition from forward flight to vertical landing.

Lockheed's first weight-optimised conventional take-off and landing flight test aircraft, AF-1, also has still has not achieved its first flight.From Flightglobal.
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       11/12/2009 10:11:41 PM
Israel's balking ar $130 million/copy price tag of F-35 and is demanding a price cut and work for its companies. They are ready to place orders for 25 soon if the price is reduced from $130 million < link >
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust    heorot   11/13/2009 1:19:57 AM
actually ashton carter is going to be in oz over the next few months to discuss JSF proj mgt and US mil procurement in general. 

There are already signs that the US is moving away from cost plus and going to fixed price - they've already made it so on one US aviation prog and the intention was to send a message to the primes.  The primes have had a fright because all of a sudden the USG is going to put their nuts in a vice.

people are misundersstanding the intent of the commentary in that article because he has certainly made his intention clear to the partners about what his intent is.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust    heorot - clarity   11/13/2009 1:23:10 AM

people are misunderstanding the intent of the commentary in that article because he has certainly made his intention clear to the partners about what his intent is.

not directed at you, but the half wits who subscribe to the APA/wheeler/spey/riccioni/sparks/meyer view of the combat world.
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       11/13/2009 3:40:09 PM
Another Israel set to order 25 F-35s at $130 million each. < link >
 
An interesting comment is that F-35 would have cost $200 million each if it was built to full Israeli specification.
 
Quote    Reply

Hamilcar       11/13/2009 4:16:37 PM

Another Israel set to order 25 F-35s at $130 million each. <link... >

 

An interesting comment is that F-35 would have cost $200 million each if it was built to full Israeli specification.


The only comment in that article of ANY interest is that someone said Iran could be bomb capable in TWO YEARS. I would like that authenticated by a credible source though. The rest is noise.
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       11/24/2009 9:13:31 AM
US makes new bid on Israeli F-35 < link >
 
What's in
 
- Israeli-built command, control, communications, computer and intelligence systems
- Spice
- Python-5 missile
- Delivery starting in 2015
 
What's out
 
- Israeli electronic warfare system
 
US wants Lockheed Martin to pay for part of cost overrun to be held accountable. < link >
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       11/24/2009 2:55:20 PM
Pentagon decides to keep F-35 source code to itself. UK is denied access to F-35 source code, and all other foreign customers will be denied as well. < link >
 
Quote    Reply

StevoJH       11/24/2009 9:22:00 PM

Pentagon decides to keep F-35 source code to itself. UK is denied access to F-35 source code, and all other foreign customers will be denied as well. <link... >

I actually saw that one on another site, if true, the UK reaction could be quite interesting, going from what they have said in the past and all.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy