What should be great to repalace F-16 it's a Gripen NG made by US and Swiden. Not that difficult considering that Gripen it's 40% american already.  Gripen NG it's the real succesor of F-16 as F-22 is the real succesor of the F-15.

If so, why America it's interested in Braizilian Supertucanos?

 

Precisely I think there it's place for small  multirol airplanes, considering today you don't need a lot of boms to do the job, just one GPS bomb and small cross section airplane.

Not all of them, look Ecuador, it's a banana republic interested in gripen NG...

If what you want it's an airplane to sunk carriers go for the Super Hornets.

My pont it's that F-35 it's not good enouht in nathing for the price. It's like the problem with the Nasa, they discovered that the Challenger was too ambitious and they are coming back to single rockets to carrie people to the space, after years of problems and accidents. Some times perfection it's the worst enemy of good.

India have already Su-27 and Gripen NG looks exactly as what they need to replace their old Migs, and 120 airplanes it's not an small number. I don't think that market it's died at all. Jus't americans are boicoting them.

 

Only 25% of the F-22 raptor original procurement have been built due to cost and political reason. I hope the math don't apply to the F-35. cause that would mean only 625 F-35s. I cant imagine United States with less then 1500 fighter. It would be suicidal.

 

Even more for my country, Canada only have buy 139 F-18 in 1980. if procurement budget is similar it would mean what? +-25 F35? Thats was already stupid to think you could defend Canadian airspace with 139 fighter. With only 20 fighter its just like if we were inviting everyone to invade us!

 

If F-35 prise go sky high, the Super hornet would be good and safe alternative for Canada. On the other side, there is alternative that could be cheaper.

Currently the request is for 65 aircraft. Originally it was higher but the order has dropped quite a bit. I think we need as many as possible, hopefully they don't cut it again.

 

  link

I am really surprised not to see Canada buying Super Hornets, or a mix of Super Hornets and F-35s.  Those poor CF-18s are not getting any younger.  Canada always seems to leave fighters on the line long after they've reached obsolescence, such as with the CF-101.

 

I disagree (as usual) with SlowMan.  There is indeed a place for smaller fighters.  Not every country needs to carry gigantic missiles; the Gripen can still carry a very respectable load, and I'd hate to face it in a dogfight.  A Su-27 is gigantic and carries with it a gigantic RCS; the Gripen, less so.  Since a country like, say, Ecuador isn't likely to have to sink carriers or anything bigger than a destroyer, the Gripen would be an excellent choice if they can afford to do so.  There are other options besides "go big or go home."  Its comparatively short legs wouldn't make it a good choice for Japan or South Korea, for instance, but for smaller countries without a lot of land to cover, it's a good choice.  (With that in mind, I'm surprised South Africa bought it instead of the Typhoon, but cost probably had a lot to do with it.)

 

I can't see using the Gripen to replace or supplement the F-16, however.  There's nothing the Gripen can do that the F-16 can't, so it would just be a step sideways.  As much as I would like to see it happen, because I like the Gripen quite a bit and would love seeing it fly around.

 

The reason why Canada don't need new airplanes yet it's becouse it's old FC-18 are in very goog shape. For those who speak french here is a very nice reportage

link

Here the link again

 

www.radio-canada.ca/emissions/decouverte/2008-2009/Reportage.asp?idDoc=66328

I think Canada should wait for the F-35 and not make a stupid money wasting decesion like Australia with the SH's. The Hornets should soldier on for another decade until the F-35 replaces them.

 

PS: Who is going to invade Canada anyway? They have to go threw the US first. We are not going to stand by and let our little brothers up north get invaded by a foreign power.

 

Well on second thought, Obama might sell out Canada to Russia for nuclear reductions and sanctions on Iran.

Our F-111's were costing an insane amount to keep in the air, something like $150 Million/year for ~20 aircraft. The F-18F's are going to cost $6 billion over 13 years including parts, fuel, ordinance, etc. While that is 460 Million per year, it includes the purchase costs of the fighters, and upgrades to the infrastructure in place to support F-111 so that it can support F-18F (so much of it is a single upfront cost, actual operational costs will be much lower).

 

Plus the F-18F is a much more viable strike platform then the 35-40 year old F-111's. On top of that, the cost of keeping the F-111's in service was only going to increase. As the F-111's would have to be replaced first, more CBR's would have to be carried out on Hornets. Now however, The Hornets can be replaced first and Super Hornest last, meaning that less CBR's need to be carried out on the Hornet fleet.