It is JUST the target I would tell the PRC bandits they risk. Non nuclear and the result is flooding. All they have to do to keep us away from it is BEHAVE.

Yeah, and they would politely explain the joys of nuclear weapons back to you.

Would you prefer nuclear weapons? I don't, not when I can bring them to heel so simply and sharply. And what of the innocents they kill now in their colonial imperialism; and the environmental damage they do in AFRICA and Southeast Asia? 

Well then if this is the case, stop making suggestions that would almost certainly cause their use. You would have been wiser to suggest blockade. A step that could be tailored from less than lethal to mining their harbors> it could be called off at anytime without effects that last a century either.

Why should the PRC bandits sow the wind and not reap the whirlwind? 

As for world opinion, Rwanda massacre,.......Darfur....to hell with that so called "world opinion".  

Herald 

Spoken like a person who truly doesn't understand how war and politics work. If world opinion didn't matter, then we would not be apologizing for killing innocent Afghans in air strikes. In this case where you are suggesting we kill innocent Chinese, you would put at risk access to the bases you need because the host nations will rebuke you for your slaughter or because they don't want to risk justified Chinese Nuclear retaliation.

People in Africa don't have the global relation ship and economic clout the Chinese do. Thousands of dead Chinese matter more than thousands of dead Africans. Sad, racist, but true.

Again, you don't know the first thing about combined arms operations OIF(You have never been and are too arrogant to listen to those who have), you don't know about UAS(another thing you have ZERO exposure to) and you don't understand Sun Tzu well enough to quote him.