Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: USAF CoS Prefers F-35, UAS and NGB. Also say USAF has enough TACAIR capability
DarthAmerica    5/27/2009 10:45:26 PM
U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Norton Schwartz said increasing production rates for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and developing the next-generation bomber are at the top of his wish list of projects to fund if the service had more money. SOURCE: h*tp://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aerospacedaily&id=news/SCHWARTZ052009.xml&headline=Schwartz%20Wish%20List:%20Boost%20F-35,%20Plan%20NGB Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on the Air Force?s $160.5 billion fiscal 2010 budget request May 19, Schwartz said service leaders felt they had enough tactical aircraft capability despite Defense Secretary Robert Gates? plans to halt F-22 Raptor procurement at 187 aircraft. The Air Force chief said the service?s leadership believed it was a ?prudent opportunity to accelerate the retirement of older aircraft.? The FY ?10 budget calls for retiring 250 F-15s, F-16s and A-10s, enabling the Air Force to redistribute more than $3.5 billion over the next six years to modernize combat air forces into a ?smaller but more capable force,? Schwartz and Air Force Secretary Michael Donley told lawmakers in joint written testimony. Schwartz did say more money would make it easier and faster to upgrade remaining legacy aircraft and make modifications to the F-22 until the F-35 starts rolling off the line in large numbers. Schwartz said the Air Force would like to see F-35 production boosted to at least 80 aircraft and perhaps as many as 110 per year before the F-16s start retiring in large numbers. Committee members, including Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) and Rep. John McHugh (N.Y.), the senior Republican on the panel, worried about producing and flying an aircraft while it was still being tested. Donley conceded budget constraints compelled the Air Force to make some difficult calls. If there was more money ?we might have made some different choices,? Schwartz added. But both leaders insisted the Air Force was not short-changing itself. The chief of staff said his wish list also included developing plans for the future long-range strike capability. ?We need, through the QDR [Quadrennial Defense Review] and the NPR [Nuclear Posture Review] to get our secretary of defense comfortable with the parameters of what we propose for that platform.? Gates canceled funding for a next-generation bomber study, which Schwartz said was of concern to the Air Force ?Once we get him comfortable with the parameters ? range, payload, manned, unmanned, nuclear, non-nuclear, low observable, very low observable ? then we need to proceed aggressively with that program.? Schwartz said the Air Force also needs to explore using additional automation in unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to reduce manpower. He noted that currently one crew operates a single UAS.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23   NEXT
DarthAmerica    ADDENDUM   5/27/2009 10:50:20 PM
F-22 PROCUREMENT NOT IN THE USAF CoS "Wish List" of top unfunded priorities...




-DA 
 
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       5/27/2009 11:12:30 PM
Schwartz said the Air Force also needs to explore using additional automation in unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to reduce manpower. He noted that currently one crew operates a single UAS.
The Wedgetail demonstrations have already shown that a controller can manage a flight/hive of UAV/UAS.
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       5/27/2009 11:58:26 PM

Schwartz said the Air Force also needs to explore using additional automation in unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to reduce manpower. He noted that currently one crew operates a single UAS.

The Wedgetail demonstrations have already shown that a controller can manage a flight/hive of UAV/UAS.
 
This is one of the things I was alluding to earlier in the discussion about conformal arrays in the other thread. Both the time and technology are right to push this capability to operational status in the very near future.

-DA 

 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    More UAV stuff...   5/28/2009 12:50:11 AM


 
 
 

 
Quote    Reply

EvilFishy       5/28/2009 2:39:38 AM
Hmm.
 
 
A computer rendering of something that does not exist VS a Fighter that exists, is cheap (relatively), and is tasked as the best Air to Air bird every build.
 
I have to go with the computer simulation.   I just hope our enemies have the processing power to play the vid files or that is going to be one awkward kind of war!
 
/s
 
*rolls eyes*
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Ignpring the comedy AGAIN>   5/28/2009 3:09:10 AM
USAF CoS Prefers F-35, UAS and NGB. Also say USAF has enough TACAIR capability
 
How is an air dominance fighter dedicated to destroying enemy IADS a CAS or TACAIR asset again?
 
The bomber and the Sparkie indicate MORE TACAIR not less.
 
So that artoicle was written by someone who doesn't know what he discusses?

Figures.
 
Also figures that the important part of the testimony is missing. Namely that the Air Force HAS to retire old aur frames, that it has no choice in this as these aircraft are used up.
 
Nothing was said about tankers or cargo airlift?
 
As usual the Youtube flurry proved nothing.
 
What is proven though Evil Fishy is that we have some bright boys at General Atomics who have looked at the mid-range market for robot bombers and recon birds. Now Australia may not be able to afford a $130 million RQ4N right now, but it MIGHT be able to afford a $30 million RQ9NB. 

Herald
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       5/28/2009 3:24:57 AM

Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on the Air Force?s $160.5 billion fiscal 2010 budget request May 19, Schwartz said service leaders felt they had enough tactical aircraft capability despite Defense Secretary Robert Gates? plans to halt F-22 Raptor procurement at 187 aircraft.

The Air Force chief said the service?s leadership believed it was a ?prudent opportunity to accelerate the retirement of older aircraft.? The FY ?10 budget calls for retiring 250 F-15s, F-16s and A-10s, enabling the Air Force to redistribute more than $3.5 billion over the next six years to modernize combat air forces into a ?smaller but more capable force,? Schwartz and Air Force Secretary Michael Donley told lawmakers in joint written testimony.
Anyone know how many A-10s will be left?
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       5/28/2009 3:25:18 AM
Herald,

I have no problem with your disagreement. But If you would please not insert the insults I'd appreciate it. I started this thread specifically to move past the other one that turned hostile. In case you haven't noticed you are really upsetting a lot of the others here by carrying this negative attitude into every thread and especially threads where I'm present. If you find me discussion topics to be comedy, then why not just choose the option of ignoring them? It kind of makes sense don't you think? Otherwise, state your disagreement and spare the PERSONAL STUFF....

In order to nip this in the bud, I've notified the Mods.

Regards
-DA  

 
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Warnerd Reply   5/28/2009 3:29:34 AM



Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on the Air Force?s $160.5 billion fiscal 2010 budget request May 19, Schwartz said service leaders felt they had enough tactical aircraft capability despite Defense Secretary Robert Gates? plans to halt F-22 Raptor procurement at 187 aircraft.



The Air Force chief said the service?s leadership believed it was a ?prudent opportunity to accelerate the retirement of older aircraft.? The FY ?10 budget calls for retiring 250 F-15s, F-16s and A-10s, enabling the Air Force to redistribute more than $3.5 billion over the next six years to modernize combat air forces into a ?smaller but more capable force,? Schwartz and Air Force Secretary Michael Donley told lawmakers in joint written testimony.


Anyone know how many A-10s will be left?
They are only retiring 3 A-10's out of the 250 total aircraft AFAIK.

-DA 
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Warnerd Reply   5/28/2009 3:31:11 AM
My bad WarNerd. I forgot the link!...

-DA 
 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy