The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: SecDef Gates recommends halting F-22 and POTUS Helo production
DarthAmerica    4/6/2009 3:53:07 PM
h*tp://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97D4QTO1&show_article=1

Apr 6 02:44 PM US/Eastern
By ANNE GEARAN
AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Monday recommended halting production of the F-22 fighter jet and scrapping a new helicopter for the president as he outlined deep cuts to many of the military's biggest weapons programs.
Gates said his $534 billion budget proposal represents a "fundamental overhaul" in defense acquisition and reflects a shift in priorities from fighting conventional wars to the newer threats U.S. forces face from insurgents in places such as Afghanistan.

The department must ensure it has the right programs and money to "fight the wars we are in today and the scenarios we are most likely to face in the years to come, while at the same time providing a hedge against other risks," Gates said as he revealed details of his budget for the next fiscal year.

The promised emphasis on budget paring is a reversal from the Bush years, which included a doubling of the Pentagon's spending since 2001. Spending on tanks, fighter planes, ships, missiles and other weapons accounted for about a third of all defense spending last year. But Gates noted more money will be needed in areas such as personnel as the Army and Marines expand the size of their forces.

Gates will likely face stiff resistance in Congress, where lawmakers are wary of losing defense contractor jobs with an economy in crisis. Some defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin Corp. have warned of huge layoffs if programs are cut.

Production of the F-22 fighter jet, which cost $140 million apiece, would be halted at 187. Plans to build a new helicopter for the president and a helicopter to rescue downed pilots would be canceled. A new communications satellite would be scrapped and the program for a new Air Force transport plane would be ended.

Some of the Pentagon's most expensive programs would also be scaled back. The Army's $160 billion Future Combat Systems modernization program would lose its armored vehicles. Plans to build a shield to defend against missile attacks by rogue states would also be scaled back.

Yet some programs would grow. Gates proposed speeding up production of the F-35 fighter jet, which could end up costing $1 trillion to manufacture and maintain 2,443 planes. The military would buy more speedy ships that can operate close in to land. And more money would be spent outfitting special forces troops that can hunt down insurgents.

"It is important to remember that every defense dollar spent to over-ensure against a remote or diminishing risk?or in effect to run up the score in a capability where the United States is already dominant?is a dollar not available to take care of our people, reset the force, win the wars we are in and improve capabilities in areas where we are underinvested and potentially vulnerable," Gates said.

The Government Accountability Office reported last week that 96 of the Pentagon's biggest weapons contracts were over budget by a "staggering" figure of $296 billion.

A bill in Congress would require the Pentagon to do a better job of making sure proposed weapons are affordable and perform the way they should before the military spends big sums on them. The Defense Department has already adjusted its acquisitions policy to achieve some of those goals.

------------------------------------------------------------------


I'm already bracing myself for the comments to follow...

-DA
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62   NEXT
DarthAmerica       4/13/2009 2:17:26 AM


Sounds pretty much like the MALD-J stand-in jammer to me--although I'm not so sure it will be AESA-equipped.  Maybe a follow-on will be.



 Also stuff like this...

 

...which in this case is a 10 year old design.

-DA 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Which has nothing to do with what I discussed.   4/13/2009 2:50:46 AM






Sounds pretty much like the MALD-J stand-in jammer to me--although I'm not so sure it will be AESA-equipped.  Maybe a follow-on will be.







 Also stuff like this...




 




...which in this case is a 10 year old design.




-DA 


Herald
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       4/13/2009 9:54:54 AM

FARNBOROUGH -- Lockheed Martin today unveiled a secret unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) prototype designed to demonstrate technologies that will later be applied to the U.S. Air Force's Long Range Strike program.

The announcement came during a briefing delivered by Frank Cappuccio, Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President and General Manager Advanced Development Programs and Strategic Planning, at the Farnborough Air Show near London.

Lockheed Martin's twin-engine, 90-ft. wingspan UAV has performed two flights below 15,000 ft. However, the tail-less "Horton" flying wing design -- similar to that of the B-2. Flight testing of the so-called Polecat is expected to reach increasingly higher altitudes this summer.

The company designed the single prototype for about $27 million and officials say it has not led to a production vehicle.

Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, the rapid prototyping arm of the military aircraft making giant, began designing the UAV in March 2003 and had it ready for first flight 18 months later. Program officials say an unusually rainy season at the Nellis Test Range forced them to slow their flight plans.

The UAV can carry 1,000 lbs. of weapons or sensors in a bay on the underbelly of the aircraft. Gross takeoff weight is 9,000 lbs.

Skunks Works officials are in talks with payload providers to explore various sensors that could be demonstrated on the vehicle in the coming years.

The UAV's endurance is about four hours with fuel in one tank in the center of the vehicle. Fuel carrying wings could later be added to boost its endurance, although company officials say it is not needed for planned tests.

A new, low-temperature manufacturing process contributes to Polecat's design, and the Skunk Works wants to explore the behavior of those composites at altitudes higher than 60,000 ft. That altitude is greater than those previously attempted with a flying wing design, program officials say.

Engineers cured composites for Polecat at 150 degrees F. and later post-cured them. Normally, composites require an autoclave and 350 degrees F. for curing. The vehicle is also made from less than 200 parts, and adhesives are used rather than rivets, decreasing the amount of labor needed to construct it -- that approach also contributed to a lower radar cross section inherent in the design.

Skunk Works also is pursuing advanced flight autonomy capabilities for the UAV in an effort to reduce mission supervision and the associated costly manpower needed to handle such vehicles. Officials say they expect to wring cost out of the airframe, although the price of engines, sensors and avionics are expected to remain constant.

The Long Range Strike program for the Air Force continues with contracts for Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and Boeing to examine separate manned and unmanned designs, optimized for both supersonic and subsonic flight. However, firm requirements have yet to be set as the Air Force examines the findings of an analysis of alternatives this summer. The Air Force is expected to extend the design work into Fiscal 2007 lead to the start of a formal system design and development phase in 2010. The new system should have initial operational capability no later than 2018.

 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       4/13/2009 10:02:45 AM

Mystery UAV operating in Afghanistan

April 10, 2009

Afghanistan maybe the testing ground for a new, advanced but as yet undisclosed UCAV programme.

Pictures shown exclusively to Unmanned Vehicles magazine and taken at an airbase in the war-torn country reveal a large flying wing-type design, adopted by UCAV designers, but not yet seen on an operational type.

The image shown in the link below has been drawn directly from the photograph but none of the experts consulted by UV had any concrete idea of what the system might be.

The image shown to UV was taken from a long distance, as the aircraft taxied in on a hazy day, but the image was clear enough to show that this UAV?s design is like no other UAV in current operational service.

Amongst the distinctive features of the type is the ?fat? wing chord, and a large central fuselage fairing. The aircraft engine nozzle is the same half moon shape as the Lockheed P175 Pole Cat, but the wing is not cranked on its trailing edge like the Pole Cat is.

The fuselage fairing could support a large squared off intake, but is more likely to house a large satellite communications and sensor mix. Two large blisters either side of the central fairing are likely to the intakes for a single turbofan engine. These features probably won?t help the aircraft?s radar cross-section, although this probably isn?t important considering the theatre of operations in which it is flying.

The large doors inboard of the main landing gear may be bomb bay doors, indicating a strike capability for the type.

There are clearly the technological capabilities to build something like this inside Northrop Grumman, Boeing or Lockheed Martin. Looking at the shaping, our analyst said he would be inclined to think this comes from either Northrop or Lockheed.

The shaping is also suggestive of UCAV concepts around the start of the 2000s.There is a whole raft of wing design work that has gone on since 2002 in terms of how the X-47B has evolved, and the sorts of designs that Boeing was working with prior to the ending of that effort.

 


-DA 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345       4/13/2009 10:10:34 AM












FARNBOROUGH -- Lockheed Martin today unveiled a secret unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) prototype designed to demonstrate technologies that will later be applied to the U.S. Air Force's Long Range Strike program.


The announcement came during a briefing delivered by Frank Cappuccio, Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President and General Manager Advanced Development Programs and Strategic Planning, at the Farnborough Air Show near London.


Lockheed Martin's twin-engine, 90-ft. wingspan UAV has performed two flights below 15,000 ft. However, the tail-less "Horton" flying wing design -- similar to that of the B-2. Flight testing of the so-called Polecat is expected to reach increasingly higher altitudes this summer.


The company designed the single prototype for about $27 million and officials say it has not led to a production vehicle.


Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, the rapid prototyping arm of the military aircraft making giant, began designing the UAV in March 2003 and had it ready for first flight 18 months later. Program officials say an unusually rainy season at the Nellis Test Range forced them to slow their flight plans.


The UAV can carry 1,000 lbs. of weapons or sensors in a bay on the underbelly of the aircraft. Gross takeoff weight is 9,000 lbs.


Skunks Works officials are in talks with payload providers to explore various sensors that could be demonstrated on the vehicle in the coming years.


The UAV's endurance is about four hours with fuel in one tank in the center of the vehicle. Fuel carrying wings could later be added to boost its endurance, although company officials say it is not needed for planned tests.


A new, low-temperature manufacturing process contributes to Polecat's design, and the Skunk Works wants to explore the behavior of those composites at altitudes higher than 60,000 ft. That altitude is greater than those previously attempted with a flying wing design, program officials say.


Engineers cured composites for Polecat at 150 degrees F. and later post-cured them. Normally, composites require an autoclave and 350 degrees F. for curing. The vehicle is also made from less than 200 parts, and adhesives are used rather than rivets, decreasing the amount of labor needed to construct it -- that approach also contributed to a lower radar cross section inherent in the design.


Skunk Works also is pursuing advanced flight autonomy capabilities for the UAV in an effort to reduce mission supervision and the associated costly manpower needed to handle such vehicles. Officials say they expect to wring cost out of the airframe, although the price of engines, sensors and avionics are expected to remain constant.


The Long Range Strike program for the Air Force continues with contracts for Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and Boeing to examine separate manned and unmanned designs, optimized for both supersonic and subsonic flight. However, firm requirements have yet to be set as the Air Force examines the findings of an analysis of alternatives this summer. The Air Force is expected to extend the design work into Fiscal 2007 lead to the start of a formal system design and development phase in 2010. The new system should have initial operational capability no later than 2018.



It or something very much like it has been seen in Kandahar, poster.  Still has nothing to do with what I an discussing. You are desperately grasping at straws and plucking nothing but thatch. Just how uninformed do you think some of us are?

Source: is Aviation Week
 
Posted by Bill Sweetman at 4/10/2009 9:25 AM CDT
Credit where credit is due: Steve Trimble reported the first flight of General Atomics' Predator C earlier this week, and now Shephard's Darren Lake has an artist's concept of what looks like a stealthy UAV or UCAV that was sighted at Kandahar recently - pictures apparently exist but have not been published.


Shephard
Interesting question is: are these events connected?

GA-ASI's jet has been in the works for years. The Predator B/Reaper was designed from the outset to accept either the Honeywell turboprop on the current aircraft or a Williams FJ44 turbofan, and the jet was almost ready to fly around the time of 9/11. However, due to strong interest from customers, this first Predator C was converted back to a prop job. Not long afterwards - I think it was Farnborough 2002 - GA-ASI boss Tom Cassidy was saying that the C had morphed into a new design.

Since then, it's been waiting for a customer and held back by the demands of the Reaper program - but its first flight and unveiling follows actions by two California congressmen to earmark funds to build two aircraft for deployment to Afghanistan, and as one of them comments, it will provide "strike" capability and "an additional covert capability."

So has someone made a quick deliberate security slip-up in Kandahar, as if to say: "Thanks, Congressman, but we've already got one of those"?

As for the Kandahar beast itself, it's hard to draw firm conclusions from a sketch based on a picture of unknown quality.

However, if it's operating out of Kandahar, it's a good first-order bet that the targets are in regions covered by Pakistani radar, since it's also a reasonable assumption that there might be a Pakistan AF radar tech or two whose allegiance is not where one would ideally like it to be.

But the same applies to a lot of people living around Kandahar, so one might also surmise that the mystery aircraft might be a bit short of range. (Otherwise, there are more secure bases in the UAE and Qatar.) A tech demo, quickly pressed into service, perhaps?

The impression gives no good clues as to the UAV's parentage. Four US groups are known to have built all-wing UAVs in the past decade-plus: Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing and Abe Karem's Frontier Systems, which competed for the Global Hawk contract as a team-mate with Loral and built a subscale demonstrator of its W570 design. For that matter, it could be British: BAE Systems flew its Corax demonstrator back in 2005.

By the way, this also confirms the comment in the last paragraph of this post from last month.link
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
When the poster has something credible: it will be noted. Until then, obsolete data will be so described and correctly explained.
 
Herald
 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Still clutching and not understanding.    4/13/2009 10:13:59 AM
This is addressed at you poster. Read the payload and endurance specs as well as the operator support footprint and don't tell me you even know what that drone is.
 
You'd be surprised at exactly how much you don't know.

Herald
 
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    COMPASS ARROW   4/13/2009 10:16:15 AM

This high-flying, unmanned photo reconnaissance aircraft is an early example of stealth technology. Developed in the late 1960s to fly into deep China, Compass Arrow was to cruise at nearly 15 miles altitude while taking photos showing ground details as small as one foot in size. After air-launching from a DC-130E Hercules aircraft, Compass Arrow navigated automatically, but it also could be flown manually by an operator in the launch aircraft. 


To present a small radar image and avoid surface-to-air missiles, Compass Arrow's vertical surfaces are canted inward, and its body uses radar-absorbing materials. The engine is mounted on top to reduce its heat signature from below, and the aircraft also carries anti-radar electronics. 


Compass Arrow was ready to deploy by late 1971, but friendlier U.S. relations with China made it unnecessary. The AQM-91A never became operational. However, lessons learned from its development contributed to later stealth fighters, bombers and unmanned aerial vehicles. 


TECHNICAL NOTES: 

Operational altitude: 78,000 ft. 

Endurance: 4.5 hours 

Range: 2,000 miles

Photography: Coverage of an area 1,720 miles long and 43 miles wide 

Span: 48 ft. 

Length: 34 ft. 

Weight: 5,245 lbs. 

 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Softwar       4/13/2009 10:18:53 AM
Darth - I fail to see how an expensive prototype - reportedly pressed into service perhaps at the contractors expense - which may have more to do with recce than anything else has something to contribute to the argument for/against the F-22. 
 
At most  - this maybe flying prototype that you have pranced before us here is nothing more than a two way version of Tomahawk.  Iis nothing more than a stealthy version of the Global Hawk - which BTW crashed once because some programmer forgot to put in hills just outside of the airbase operating it.
 
So far - the most advanced UCAV is the NAVY X-47B - which has a limited payload and has not even demonstrated the ability to land or take off from a carrier.  The USAF may very well be pursuing a UCAV bomber - but that is years away - not today - not next year or even by 2015.  Thus - the only two aircraft in the inventory that are stealthy enough to perform deep strike are the billion dollar plus B-2 and the F-22.
 
None of this applies in an air combat mode - which no UCAV has demonstrated or even been required to do so in its program specs. 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Still clutching and not understanding.    4/13/2009 10:20:30 AM

P-175 Polecat

P-175 Polecat

On June 19 2006, Lockheed Martin unveiled the existence of a new high altitude, unmanned aerial demonstrator to reporters attending the Farnborough International Air Show. The announcement was part of a review of several Skunk Works projects highlighting technologies the company is exploring to enable technology for the future.


"This UAV is an effort to better understand the flight dynamics of a tailless unmanned air system in support of our ongoing research and development work for the U.S. Air Force?s future Long Range Strike Program as well as to field the next generation of structural composite concepts," explained Frank Cappuccio, executive vice president and general manager of Advanced Development Programs and Strategic Planning.

Developed in only 18 months, using internal funding, unmanned system P-175, nicknamed ?Polecat? ? aligned with the well-known Skunk Works name ? represents the key tenets for which the Skunk Works is known. ?It was specifically designed to verify three things: new, cost effective rapid prototyping and manufacturing techniques of composite materials; projected aerodynamic performance required for sustained high altitude operations; and flight autonomy attributes,? said Cappuccio. ?In addition, the company investment and the resulting successful flights are proof positive of our commitment to developing the next inflection point in unmanned systems.?

Cappuccio said the company is also exploring technologies to enable low boom, supersonic flight over land and global reach.

?It?s easy to identify a need,? said Cappuccio. ?The hard part is evolving the technology to make filling that need possible. The Skunk Works is all about advancing the art of the possible. It may sound nebulous to some, but we thrive on ideas and innovation.?

Recent developments (news)

Lockheed confirms P-175 Polecat UAV crash

Posted at: Mon Mar 19th, 2007 | Source: Flight Global

Lockheed confirms P-175 Polecat UAV crash Lockheed Martin has confirmed that its P-175 Polecat unmanned air vehicle crashed in December on the Nevada test range after the unintentional activation of its flight termination system.

PopSci Awards F-35 Lightning II and Polecat UAV Best of What's New for 2006

Posted at: Tue Dec 5th, 2006 | Source: Lockheed Martin

PopSci Awards F-35 Lightning II and Polecat UAV Best of What's New for 2006 FORT WORTH, Texas, Dec. 4 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter and the P-175 Polecat Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) have received the 2006 Best of What's New awards from Pop...

Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works Reveils New High Altitude UAV

Posted at: Thu Jul 20th, 2006 | Source: lockheedmartin.com

Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works Reveils New High Altitude UAV Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] today unveiled the existence of a new high altitude, unmanned aerial demonstrator to reporters attending the Farnborough International Air Show. The announcement was part of a review of several Skunk Works projects highlighting technologies the company is exploring to ena... » P-175 Polecat RSS News Feed rss news feed
===================================================
 
Just an example of what you don't know, poster, just an example.
 
Herald 


 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345       4/13/2009 10:24:00 AM
GF:
 
I'll have something for you tomorrow.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Softwar    Compass Arrow   4/13/2009 10:26:40 AM
Darth -
 
Compass Arrow was a revised Ryan Firebee drone - which we flew over Vietnam to perform recce missions.  It was nothing more than a drone with TERCOM and a pre-programmed course to perform elint/and photo recon.  It had no part in the early SPASM program.
 
Again - this has zero to do with current capability - other than two show 1970s history.  In fact, I'll give you dollars to donuts you have no idea what the SPASM program was or what it evolved into.
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Combine this with JITSA   4/13/2009 10:36:35 AM
ht*p://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d1ORgVjZto


Also,

Budget document discloses existence of secret US Air Force UAV programme 

Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works is believed to be developing a high-altitude, stealthy unmanned aircraft system (UAS) for the US Air Force (USAF) under a secret programme, funded with money taken from the terminated Joint Unmanned Combat Air System (J-UCAS) project. 

The existence of a classified air force UAS project was disclosed in a navy Fiscal Year 2007 budget document, which stated that the Pentagon "directed the J-UCAS programme to split into two separate programmes: one air force classified programme and a navy UCAV [unmanned combat aerial vehicle] programme". 

The new UAV, sometimes known as the Penetrating High Altitude Endurance (PHAE), is believed to be capable of operating at the 70,000-80,000 ft altitudes used by the U-2. One report refers to the aircraft using engines from an inventory that has been in storage since the 1970s. This almost certainly refers to the General Electric J97-GE-3 engine for the Teledyne Ryan AQM-91 Compass Arrow UAV (a project terminated in 1971). In 1998, a NASA paper reported that 24 J97 engines were in storage at the agency's Ames research centre. The Compass Arrow exceeded 80,000 ft during tests, the highest unclassified altitude ever recorded for a subsonic jet-powered aircraft. The J97 was rated at around 25 kN and the new UAV is probably a twin-engine design. 

The new UAV is much larger than the small stealth UAV that has been evaluated operationally in Iraq. That aircraft - believed to be powered by one or two Williams FJ33 engines - has only eight hours' endurance, like DarkStar, and that is currently seen as inadequate.  

 

 

-DA
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Softwar Reply   4/13/2009 10:47:13 AM

Darth - I fail to see how an expensive prototype - reportedly pressed into service perhaps at the contractors expense - which may have more to do with recce than anything else has something to contribute to the argument for/against the F-22. 

 What it has to do with it is that this is the direction the we need to be going in to combat current and future threats. The F-22's we have are great for air combat today and through 2025 but represent a technology path at it's peak. If we want to stay ahead, it's UCAVs.

At most  - this maybe flying prototype that you have pranced before us here is nothing more than a two way version of Tomahawk.  Iis nothing more than a stealthy version of the Global Hawk - which BTW crashed once because some programmer forgot to put in hills just outside of the airbase operating it.

 A two way reusable CM is a UAV by definition. Its also designed for penetrating denied airspace.

So far - the most advanced UCAV is the NAVY X-47B - which has a limited payload and has not even demonstrated the ability to land or take off from a carrier.  The USAF may very well be pursuing a UCAV bomber - but that is years away - not today - not next year or even by 2015.  Thus - the only two aircraft in the inventory that are stealthy enough to perform deep strike are the billion dollar plus B-2 and the F-22.

 That's not true. There are others. And the USAF Bomber had a target of 2018 Softwar on a very conservative schedule. 2015 is not a stretch by any means.

None of this applies in an air combat mode - which no UCAV has demonstrated or even been required to do so in its program specs. 

Well I already showed that isn't true with actual footage of a UAV involved in air combat vs a live target that shot back.  

-DA 

 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Just sdo some of you know exactly what thois poaster keeps grasping.   4/13/2009 10:54:17 AM
 
Note how many exploit paths I can use to disrupt it?

All of these concepts rely on secure friendly telemetry in the battle-space and a stupid static enemy.. As tested as early as the Balkans IN WAR the telemetry fails the proof stage of concept. 
 
Posting without understanding isn't helping that poster make any kind of a legitimate case here.
 
Analysis indicates that he doesn't know exact systems limitations or integration issues involved.
 
It's called in plain English, information channel confusion, or what is true and not true and who is talking to what? 
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Just so some of you know exactly what this poster keeps grasping.   4/13/2009 11:00:15 AM




Darth - I fail to see how an expensive prototype - reportedly pressed into service perhaps at the contractors expense - which may have more to do with recce than anything else has something to contribute to the argument for/against the F-22. 



 What it has to do with it is that this is the direction the we need to be going in to combat current and future threats. The F-22's we have are great for air combat today and through 2025 but represent a technology path at it's peak. If we want to stay ahead, it's UCAVs.



At most  - this maybe flying prototype that you have pranced before us here is nothing more than a two way version of Tomahawk.  Iis nothing more than a stealthy version of the Global Hawk - which BTW crashed once because some programmer forgot to put in hills just outside of the airbase operating it.



 A two way reusable CM is a UAV by definition. Its also designed for penetrating denied airspace.



So far - the most advanced UCAV is the NAVY X-47B - which has a limited payload and has not even demonstrated the ability to land or take off from a carrier.  The USAF may very well be pursuing a UCAV bomber - but that is years away - not today - not next year or even by 2015.  Thus - the only two aircraft in the inventory that are stealthy enough to perform deep strike are the billion dollar plus B-2 and the F-22.



 That's not true. There are others. And the USAF Bomber had a target of 2018 Softwar on a very conservative schedule. 2015 is not a stretch by any means.



None of this applies in an air combat mode - which no UCAV has demonstrated or even been required to do so in its program specs. 




Well I already showed that isn't true with actual footage of a UAV involved in air combat vs a live target that shot back.  




-DA 





There has been no further air to air attempts you'll notice? You'll also notice that all of your examples are operator monitored and controlled as well as look down talk up or talk back?
 
In other words you still fail to prove a thing, poster.  All you do is catalog a series of drone approaches that all contain a man in the loop element and most of which have FAILED.
 
Keep trying. I'm drinking my coffee and enjoying the exercise.
 
Herald
 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy