1 - no export sales -----------maybe soon
2 - no laser designator ----------- according to the schedule it should have been done in early 2009, so the damocles pod may be be integrated right now
3 - no AESA ----------- incoming,link...
Still not here, though - and yet its raised as a dead cert every few posts. This is despite the fact that not only has France reduced its build rate (ugly if costs are to be amortised) but now it's looking for an export partner (and probably any partner) to moxy up for AESA dev and integration costs as part of a fleet buy. 4 - overpriced 4th gen fighter --------- cheaper than F-22, F-35, Eurofighter, it will serve France perfectly (from military, political and economical point of views) and with its abilities, it could satisfy the requirements of a lot of countries.
...Against Rafale F-1 according to your greek document... Rafale F-1 was a substandard for the French Navy : radar rbe-2 and spectra at F-1 standard, no link-16, etc... very immature plateform TOO like the RWR-less f-16 block 52 at time of the exercise (your bias is impressive to be honest).
Moreover, if some people think that French Air Force or French Navy are going to use their EW equipments at "full power" during friendly exercises, they are mistaken.
Mais bien sur. Every time Rafale loses, it is because the French were holding back! Just like in Singapore, just like in Korea, just like against the Super Hornets in JTFX, just like the Rafale killed by a Jaguar in TLP, just like in every other exercise in which the Rafale shows that it is simply a competent but very pedestrian little 4th generation fighter.
phaid="uprated engines required to support AESA"
wrong, the Rafale doesn't need uprated engines to operate an AESA. The Rafale demonstrated the rbe 2 aesa in switzerland in 2008 with its current m-88 engines.
StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy