Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?
Military Strength    4/15/2004 10:17:27 AM
I read an article that the Tu 160 can match the b2 spirit? in my view russia's bombers are lacking far behind us bomber capabilities. what are ur thoughts guys?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2 3   NEXT
B.Smitty    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/15/2004 11:26:10 AM
what do you mean by 'match'?
 
Quote    Reply

interrested 2    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/15/2004 11:39:26 AM
Can my MPV match your Porsche?.. Really, this sound a lot like another: the top 10 bombers, 10 ten fighters etc etc.... But to answer your question, both have vastly different capabilities and are not comparable.
 
Quote    Reply

giblets    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/15/2004 1:07:49 PM
Surely a far better comparison would be the Tu-160 versus the B-1b.
 
Quote    Reply

Military Strength    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/15/2004 3:43:04 PM
i mean can the tu-160 compete with the b-2 spirit
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/15/2004 4:03:57 PM
here we go again, compete in what? appearance? mystery? use of space age technologies? stealth? speed? load out? altitude? minimum runway length? power to weight ratio - eg (like a porsche)? wing area? shade value? length? the use of LCD's? ergonomics? the list is endless... ;)
 
Quote    Reply

Military Strength    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/16/2004 4:12:37 PM
compete in terms of speed, stealth, technology,flexibility, adatability, all weather conditions i mean the whole lot..which aircraft is better?? to put is short
 
Quote    Reply

Ad    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/16/2004 7:39:31 PM
Well that depends. Have you got £.12 billion lying around? If not. I?d suggest you buy a few Black-Jacks instead.
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   4/20/2004 3:14:51 AM
No. Nothing against the Tu-160 or its crews, but the B-2 is in another class. A better comparison would be a Tu-160 against a B-1B, and I would say that the Blackjack is a little better.
 
Quote    Reply

jacques    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   5/6/2004 7:34:28 AM
Why is the Blackjack better than the Lancer ? It's bigger but carry less bombs/missiles. Its level of sophislication is similiar to the b1a. The B1B is much more sophislicated. The only advantage the blackjack have over the lancer is its EO sensor. I'm sure the B1B can be equipted with even better EO sensor if there is a perceive need for it.
 
Quote    Reply

boris the romanian    RE:Can Russa's Tu 160 match US b2 Spirit bombers?   5/6/2004 9:11:49 AM
Okay, here we go again. The Blackjack will never equal the B-2 in capability (except in rain/haze, where the B-2's stealth capabilities were found to be a little lacking, if I remember correctly...). The Blackjack is also inferior to the Lancer as a bomb truck, but it IS superior to the American in a deep penetration role because it a) Has a smaller RCS. The jagged shape of the inlets coupled with reduced curvature of the fuselage gives it better LO properties (but, of course, it doesn't compare to the B-2). b) It has significantly better flight performance and range, giving it greater flexibility in that it can have a more varied flightpath to the target. In the nuclear strike role it is well enough armed for the task (12 Kh-15 "SRAMskiis + 6 Kh-55), and the LO/flight performance combo would give it a better chance than the Lancer. I know, the maintenance track record isn't spectacular, but the basic design of the Tu-160 is a sound one, and, were it built in a Western country and operated with proper maintenance schedules, it would no doubt be very much better. Haven't we discussed this before.......?
 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy